Halo 3
Resistance: FOM
Sonic ’06
Grand Theft Auto Vice City Stories
Clay Fighter 2
Sonic Adventure DX
That god awful first ps1 contra game
Breath of Fire Dragon Quarter
Sonic the Hedgehog PS3
Lord of the Rings – 2 Towers
Honorable Mention: FFX-2
edit: Oh, and Masters of Orion 3 :>
Twisted Metal Small Brawl
Mega Man X7
Primal
Children of Mana was pretty terrible but I didn’t really know what to expect going into it. New Super Mario Bros was disappointingly easy.
Lemmings 3D
Pitball
Children of Mana was pretty terrible but I didn’t really know what to expect going into it. New Super Mario Bros was disappointingly easy.
Amen.
WipEout Fusion (PS2)
Parasite Eve 2: Electric Boogaloo (PSone)
Mega Man 8 (PS2)
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 2: Electric Boogaloo (NES)
Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles (NGC)
Bushido Blade 2 (had no idea what to do)
Final Fantasy XII (expected a better story)
Also, PW: JFA really dissapointed me, since Franziska is possibly the most aggravating character since Navi in OoT. I’m in the circus case and haven’t even gotten to the clown’s testimony (which I hear is pure agony), and I just can’t pick it up anymore. Not to mention how boringly slow the investigating is 🙁
Oblivion (PC) – Kinda. It’s not as good as Morrowind imho.
Baldur’s Gate: Dark Alliance I+II (PS2) – Don’t name a shitty hack n’ slash after a great RPG
Phantasy Star Universe (PS2)
Final Fantasy XI (PC) – The JP players had a fucking yearlong head start.
Neverwinter Nights 2 (PC)
All Megamans post-X4 (PS2)
Star Wars: KOTOR 2 (PC) – How can you leave out that much shit?
Final Fantasy X-2 (PS2) – Need I say more?
Final Fantasy Tactics Adv (GBA) – From the political intrigue of FFT to a bunch of idiot kids in FFTA
Gladius (GC) – Walk, fight, repeat.
Probably more.
1. Indianapolis 500 (Wii)
2. FFX-2 (obviously)
thats about all I can name now, I usually research games before I buy, so I hardly end up with dissappointments.
thanks for changing nearly every control assholes.
Devil may cry 2 (ps2)
Both matrix games (ps2)
Metal gear 2(ps2)
Metal Gear 2 was on the NES…
Final Fantasy X-2
Cant think of anything else tbh. Not that I havent played other games that were a let down its just these were ones I was looking forward to a lot.
Also Hexen II: way too many undelivered promises.
Thar was the first TR game I played, and while I enjoyed it, the ending just seem to take away everything I liked…
I can’t even remember it how it actually went, but I do know it kinda killed my experience with that game…
I also didn’t like Devil May Cry 2 much.
most notorious:
mystic heroes (ngc) (i think super mario sunshine -which i traded for MH was better)
manhunt – people said its awesome and gory and stuff, i played it and the stealth thing, always walking and evading… made it boring.
ninjabread man (wii) – only 3 LEVELS, got it for my GF and we both hated it.
time stalkers (DC) – seemed good, but it far surpasses the repetiteveness of standard rpgs)
nobunagas ambition (NES) – wasnt what i expected.
the list is so big…
Shadow of the Colossus
Metroid Prime Hunters
That game was super dissapointing compared to the first.
terrible, i’d play da x games everyday but not that one
for marking the end of Crash Bandicoot games that were good.
Yes, I know I just had a monologue, but there was SOME useful stuff in there.
I hope.
terrible, i’d play da x games everyday but not that one
YOU’VE BEEN TO THE FUTURE TOO?
All these things may be true but the retro styled hidden levels were just sublime and when platforming is that good I can overlook a lot
a boy and his blob (nes, anyone remember it? Slide your way into the pits of Hell, boy and his blob!)
Shin megami tensei (ps2, unfair battle system, ages to level up your demons!)
Chaos field (dc)
Psyvarriar 2 twtf (dc, no co-up gaming! now, that sucks for a shmup…)
etc etc etc
Zombie Nation for the nes seems to come to mind though.
WOW! Just WOW!
Atleast you said it was a decent game.
At least they fixed that with Code Veronica.
At least they fixed that with Code Veronica.
I don’t recall saying it was the series best hour.
I never implied that you said it either.
I never implied that you said it either.
Hum… indeed.
palm
all other men must call me "mate" or "buddy". since i have a feeling of rugged comraderie for those fellows
women may address me as "friend" as i am particularlly shy around those ones
unless they are from sweden, if such a thing were to happen "bekant" would be acceptable but if they do so they must address me as "ambassador" every second instance of their greeting me, this rule is unbreakable and holds for life once "bekant" has been uttered
if the swedish girl is BLONDE then they may call me "kamrad" and the rule above is extended to every THIRD hello
if they are SANDY they may address me as whatever they like unless it is a generally unfriendly sort of secret. the "ambassador" rule does not hold in this instance
mormons may call me "sweetheart" or "washcloth" but only on the second thursday of every month because that is probably a mormon holiday and in the instance the must call ne "your highness"
if you call me the *S*E*C*R*E*T* *P*H*R*A*S*E* you will be the recipient of a fabulous voucher worth $200 in your local beauty parlour. no to be sold, cash value of voucher is 0.005c.
if anyone at any point calls me "bint" then they must collect 50 pretend monies and not pass "go"
And Xenosaga II. Thank goodness I and III were awesome.
Suikoden 4
Breath of Fire Dragon Quarter
Suikoden V saved the series after IV.
Dragon Quarter killed the Breath of Fire series..
Then we have Lufia: Ruins of Lore. Let me tell you something; Lufia-Sinistrals-challenging puzzles does NOT = Lufia.
Of course the number one top of my list is Lunar: Dragon Song. What even gave them the right to call this a Lunar game? It had none of the depth of the series, the story was okay, there was nothing you really felt like working for, and it was too short, probably for the reason the developers realized nobody would want to play any longer. Definition: Video game on a budget cut. Let’s leave Lunar to Lucia, okay?
Seriously, what the fuck?
Other than that I agree.
If you haven’t heard of him, youtube him. He’s pretty damn hilarious.
Bassist’s talking about the time he did a review on 2 simpson games, Bart Vs the space mutants and Bart Vs the world.
DMC2
That’s all for now
Ghost Recon 2 ended up being my ash tray’s lid, and eventually melting into oblivion.
Final Fantasy 7. I played 9 first, and thought "Wow, if this is so good, 7 must be incredible". I played it, and failed to understand why the hell there are about ten zillion spin-offs, and 99% of the internet worship it.
Also, all the 3D sonic games except SA2B. Shadow the Hedgehog. The only thing that prevented me from killing myself was the prescence of Vector, Espio and Charmy.
Also, i… quite liked Starfox Adventures. In a very RPGish, non-starfoxy way.
Oh. And Halo. I played it at my friend’s house and my brain nearly melted with boredom.
Mega Man 5, 6, 7
Simpsons games, except the arcade one
Base Wars
Street Fighter 2010 (what else was a 10 yr. old kid going to think it was?)
Bahamut Lagoon
Front Mission: Gun Hazard (except for the music)
I stopped at the exact same spot. Golly gee, JFA is so darn awful I don’t know how anybody can stomach it. I eventually played it again just for the fourth case – the only good part of the game.
@ the person complaining about FFCC coming to Wii: I think they’d have learned their lesson after the original. I’d put money on them actually including a story this time.
@ the people saying bad stuff about FFX-2: You suck.
@ the person disappointed by post 2nd gen pokemon games: I agree.
In West Clownadelphia born and raised…^____^
In West Clownadelphia born and raised…^____^
I want to hurt PW’s american localisation team.
Seriously?
Please don’t tell me you’d rather play Contra.
You’re cruel. Gears is an excellent title.
Here’s a list of disappointments.
Final Fantasy X-2
Devil May Cry 2
Shin Megami Tensai Nocturne
Shin Megami Tensai Digital Devil Saga
Shin Megami Tensai Digital Devil Saga 2
Shin Megami Tensai Devil Summoner
Shin Megami Tensai Persona 3
Halo
Halo 2
Halo 3
There’s more, but I’ll stop for the moment.
To me the Shin Megami Tensai games seemed bland.
Super Mario Sunshine, unlike Super Mario Galaxy didn’t manage to captivate me on par with Super Mario 64, which was quite anticlimactic, as my expectations were exceptionally high in Mario’s forte of the platform genre.
Advance Wars: Day of Ruin is an arrant letdown for me. The colorful personalities of the characters, the tuneful music and the mechanics of the previous installments of the series are drastically different insomuch to be different game altogether. I feel the changes the developers opted for are simply too abrupt for veterans of the previous games to cope with immediately. The staple of Advance Wars was the ability to approach any problem(s) on the battlefield with plenty of flexibility in one’s strategies, not just dictated by the developer’s criteria, which is apparent in the latest game.
Simpsons games, except the arcade one
Agreed.
And yes, I was disappointed by Halo 3 as well. Fucking hype machine.
Grand theft Auto 4..boring after the first few hours
Gears of War..no story, too easy and terrible AI
Super Mario Galaxy..yawn
Army of Two..Too short
Shaq Fu
Rise of the Robots
Final Fantasy 7
The Sims 2
Terrible cover system, terrible driving physics, Niko runs like he’s wearing skis and he crouches like he’s trying to poop.
Shaq Fu
Rise of the Robots
Final Fantasy 7
The Sims 2
You thought Shaq-fu was going to be good?
I hadn’t a clue what to expect out of it either way tbh. Though still couldn’t believe how bad it turned out to be. Tried it out back when I was about 12 out of curiosity, as someone I knew – who was really into fighting games at the time – happened to mention they’d been playing it. Needless to say I soon learnt the error of my ways!
Forza Motorsport 2 – I got it free with the 360, but it sucks so much.
Morrowind – I had such high hopes, but I guess the problem is that I played it after Oblivion. Talking to townsfolk is like reading a book, and I hated the battle system too.
Contact- I was told this was great. Its ok.
Gears Of War- To much Hype. I expected to much I guess.
Black- To easy
Lost Odyssey
Grand Theft Auto IV
Dragonquest VIII
Rock Band
Most accessible multiplayer ever. Difference.
Kingdom Hearts 2
I can’t speak for everybody else, but for me, the gameplay GTA IV is exactly like Vice City and San Andreas, and even GTA III. Basically, you steal cars, get guns, shoot people, get chased by cops, occassionally do a mission, repeat. The plot didn’t really thrill me, either. Anyway, it bores me now, and I can happily take it out of my collection. A waste of money, now that I think about it.
Forza Motorsport 2 – I got it free with the 360, but it sucks so much.
Morrowind – I had such high hopes, but I guess the problem is that I played it after Oblivion. Talking to townsfolk is like reading a book, and I hated the battle system too.
are you crazy Morrowind is my favourite game.
On its own right, Morrowind is an excellent game. However, I’ve heard that Oblivion is a total masterpiece, so I can see where Olde is coming from there.
That and the whole, "You died? Well fuck you! Start from the last time you saved, which would be about 4 hours ago! Checkpoints? Fuck you." Thing kinda put me off.
Yeah, if by ‘accessible’ you mean ‘Being called a noob by squeaky-voiced kids online’…
LAN action is the only thing Halo does right.
😎 That was a big problem I thought, too…although you could turn auto-save on.
On its own right, Morrowind is an excellent game.
I’m sure it is a really stellar game, especially for its time, but…I guess I just can’t get into it. 🙁
GTA San Andreas, GTA 4
Metal Gear Solid 1-3, havent played 4, am not going to either.
C&C Generals
Halo 1-3
RE3
Manhunt
Crysis(orgasmically good looking, but it really isnt a good game)
Auto-Save WAS on.
Totally understandable. If you played Oblivion first it can be mighty difficult to sacrifice all those pretty graphics, radiant AI, and sensible combat to play Morrowind. Don’t get me wrong, Morrowind is truly epic and I’d recommend it to anyone who wants to play an awesome game, but Oblivion upgraded so much.
That and the whole, "You died? Well fuck you! Start from the last time you saved, which would be about 4 hours ago! Checkpoints? Fuck you." Thing kinda put me off.
As for the saving though, are you effing serious? Is being able to save anywhere at any time such a huge inconvenience? Honestly, are you new to Western RPGs?
Others:
Final Fantasy XII
Oblivion
Fable
Warhammer Online
Final Fantasy VII
Megaman Battle Network 4
i honestly prefer playing dead or alive xtreme 2 over that.
Man it with that weird as hell intro
and the ability to not save where you left off? Wtf is that.
I mean I can understand how it could have been good but there is no point in saving when all you are saving is a score.
that would be like playing Metal Gear Solid and saving jsut the kill record or something.
Any Sonic game after Sonic Heroes.
Devil May Cry 2.
Worms: A Space Oddity.
Also Naruto Ultimate Ninja Heroes caus it had no story mode.
Baldur’s Gate: Dark Alliance- I loved the Baldur’s Gate games. I spent large parts of my childhood watching my parents play the Baulder’s Gate games together. I don’t think I’ll ever forget many things about it, things like Minsc and Boo. The day my parents let me play their old copies was a very very wonderful day for me, it was like a coming of age ceremony. I was finally old enough to play the same games as adults! Yes!
Ok, now zoom into the future. Oh wow, a new Baldur’s gate game! Wow! Oh wait. It has nothing at all to do with the first games. It’s not even truly run off of a DnD system. On top of all that, it’s a hack and slash, and not even a fun one at that. Fail.
Someone else had this listed, and they mentioned a BG:DA2. I did not know about a sequels existence, and I am awestruck that the first one did well enough to warrant a second one.
Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles: Echos of Time.-
Right. So I have this friend. Me and this friend don’t get to game together much because its an Internet friend, an online friend with different consoles than me. We only share two systems together- A computer, Which we can’t game over because, as soon as I uninstalled Linux and installed XP, it takes decades to load a web page on it. Yes, even this one. I’m slowly managing to get rid of a lot of XP junk that’s not needed and that’s slowing me down, but st- I’m getting off topic.
Right, so the other console is a Wii. We want to play with each other a lot. So we look around and settle on the game I’m now saying I am disappointed by. The disappointment probably isn’t really from the game itself, but you guys didn’t specify so whatever.
We start it up together and for a few days have a grand old time mucking about together, throwing each other at objects we want each other to pick up. (Wii has no Voice Chat). And, since he was horrible at jumping, me leaping into pits and hurling him across to the adjacent platform. Then suddenly he decided to go beat the game by himself while I was busy with school.
He beats the game within like a week.
He now refuses to play it with me.
I briefly tried to play it by myself, but without the fun antics we both got each other into, it instantly became a very very very horrible game. I don’t think I’m even 15% through it. I gave up. It’s on the bottom of my Wii game pile right now. It’s even under Marvel: Ultimate Alliance.
I swear I’m never buying a game to play with this guy again.
Neverwinter Nights 2: I loved the first one. I hated the second one. I won’t even go into this any further.
Popolocroise- Everyone told me it was good, Everyone seemed to think that this imported Playstation RPG ported to the PSP was a shining gemstone in a large steaming vat of… uh… not gemstones. I looked up lots of reviews, I got pretty hyped. Sure, it was kiddy, but sometimes that’s a good thing to have.
To be fair, it probably was an AMAZING game before it was ported to the PSP. It’s pretty, smooth, and is rather fun despite the large childish theme. The thing that ruined this game? Random encounters. To be more specific, the 5 minute loading time you must wait through at the beginning and end of each encounter. Lets do math, Random encounters happen a lot, we’ll say that in order to get to the beginning town to the nearest town, you face about five random battles. Since the battles are random, this can be increased or decreased but as I said, they’re rather likely to happen. Each will have ten total minutes of loading time.
That’s almost an hour of looking at a loading game. I suspect that such loading times were nonexistent in the original version, because if you look at almost any ported game that arrives on the PSP, you’ll notice a large load wait.
b4 i start i know the topic name, but seriously if this list prevents anyone from making same mistakes then id post this a dozen times lol
THPS3, two was clearly amazing, i ruled at 2, it was just that good i dont need to say more, but 3, jesus did it suck and there was an airport level i think, WTF is with that?
FF12, in one word BORING. This game was worse than 9, 9 got good after kuja turned on alexandria, but up till that point it was pointless side quests and if u wanted the greatest weapon, u had to skip em all. 9 ruined the chocobo’s appeal too. Back 2 12, main character was poor, romance was clingy and a little weird due to their age, queen was cool and basche was okay, but it was clearly a glorified WoW rip off, really bad choice to let everyone run around with gambits and power level to their hearts content.
Assasins creed, worst stealth game ever, u could only stealth kill the same ways over and over, tenchu had a little variety. but since everyones hung up on its graphics, lets put it another way, FFX, graphically amazing for ps2, however, the story was linear and no room for movement till after return to zanarkand. Graphics are nothing, thats why everyone still loves MGS1.
Theme park world (enough said)
Dune 2000 (its not C&C red alert)
dbz goku densetsu (only goes up to cell saga, for ???30, i at least deserved to hit SSJ4)
Armored core: Nexus (Its not AC2 or AC2: AA)
Dragonquest (Dear god, i do not wanna slap around slimes for 100 hours, even if the limit system was cool but im suprised funimation didnt sue em for clearly ripping of a super saiya-jin, like trance kuja (Square enix get away with so much) )
Enter the Matrix (we all know sword and the hacking the new level open is the only good part of that game, and thats IT. well perhaps hearing the snapping of peoples necks)
Mortal Kombat Deception (Story mode was cool but poorly executed, redeemed with shoalin monks and armageddons story mode, but still such a poor game)
Yugi-oh Capsule monsters (i like duelist of the roses, but im playing yugi-oh, not ****ing chess, he wanted it to be as popular as chess, not a chess rip off.)
Kingdom hearts (Sorry i like it till pirates of the carribean comes into it or FF cameos where sora kicks most FF characters asses. HES GOT A GIANT KEY! it may as well be a baseball bat vs sephiroth or cloud. It maybe a kids game but dont drag down perfectly good characters please)
FF dirge of cerberus (good concept poorly executed, this game wouldve been far better in a devil may cry format, though it did slightly remind me of DMC and i dunno why?????)
FF crisis core (Two words, Plot holes. not to mention, in the anime sephiroth let go of the damn sword when cloud lifted him, just like anyone would. but this isnt a spot the difference in FF7 topic so….everything else i loved)
Sonic heroes (Holy jesus as much as i loved super sonic in 3d, it just wasnt worth the playtime or the money, it really really wasnt.)
Pokemon (Anyone one of them after diamond, is NOT worth playing, just trust me. The damn legendary pokemon got to strong for there own good and ruined the later games especially those online ones on the Wii and not bringing up planting flowers for cuteness berries or whatever, im battling with my pokemon, not taking it out on a date.)
Any game with yugi oh GX (Sorry but to many card effects, ruins the game, especially most of jaidens cards like the neo spacian mole >_< give me blue eyes and dark paladin any day.)
FFX-2 (We were all disappointed, it was so feminist, FACT, their has been no all male FFs (even if u were to try FF1) and i wouldnt want their to be, yaoi fanboys and girls would have a field day. More than the fun they have with sephiroth and cloud -_-‘)
Drakengard (Dynasty warriors will always be the best game in that genre and it was poor, even dragon flying)
Counter strike (When you had to start paying for it, otherwise i loved everything about that, most of the reason i had to catch up in college at 16)
Little Devil (CDi) (Was never re-released for PC and havent been able to find an emulator that worked for CDi)
Sonic mega collection (ps2 right?) (Why play it when theirs a million emulators for mega drive, even megadriver have MAME for arcade version of goldenaxe)
Any XBOX game that isnt Halo and on that note Halo wars, for not being Halo lol
Lost in blue 1 (completed it within first day of playing it, 8 hours i think, maybe less)
Guitar hero 3 online (everyone chooses through the fire and flames lol)
Soul Calibur 4 (Maxi is the best character, but this game just irritated me, especially all the star wars fan boys and the ultimate character being so poor, even cervantes in soul edge was harder)
Sonic CD (worst sonic ever, even worse than heroes, thank god for sonic 3d on the mega drive)
Streets of rage 3 (Just wasnt 1 or 2, it just didnt work)
Xenosaga part 2 (Coz iv never seen part 3 or part 1 out in any game stores -_-‘)
Ms Pacman (The drive for equality started here people, seriously wtf? Ms pacman will never get a husband if she keeps eating so many of those cherries :P)
i can name so many more. however, its funnier if i say it at random times.
The game that really bothered me was Magna Carta: Tears of Blood, it was so restrictive and the whole world it was set in was kinda bland, i’ve completed it but it just didnt connect with me, storytelling was so so. a weak game, most of you might not agree with me, which is cool but i had nothing but a terrible experience
The game that really bothered me was Magna Carta: Tears of Blood, it was so restrictive and the whole world it was set in was kinda bland, i’ve completed it but it just didnt connect with me, storytelling was so so. a weak game, most of you might not agree with me, which is cool but i had nothing but a terrible experience
The only truly best part of FF12, was the headhunter things, that i admit was a very damn good idea.
The best thing about that game was the art direction. The story is a standard fare, the graphics ok, but the fighting imo much too complex especially for the encounter rate. I felt like every battle took forever perhaps because I paid attention to and tried to follow the lengthy list of rulesets. I hope Magna Carta 2 improves the experience.
Zelda: Twilight Princess might rank here as well. I wasn’t even that much interested in it (unlike the MASSIVE HYPE most Zelda fans made) despite enjoying the series a lot, but the game still fell short to me. Too long, bland, easy. It’s such a shame, since the game exceeded in so many ways, but that just didn’t make it less boring to play.
Ironic, because MGS1 is arguably the best looking PS1 game.
And people are crying for a remake with MGS4 graphics.
I would’ve called it Infant’s Underpants just so it’d sell well to pedos~
Well, I personally don’t categorize them in the same way since one uses pre-rendered backgrounds and the other one is, let’s say, "real" 3D. Which is why I compared MGS and Vagrant, but not the FFs >:
In the pre-rendered side, I’d personally go with Final Fantasy IX. After finishing it for the first time, FF8’s animation seemed real blocky in comparison. Not sure where I’d fit Chrono Cross, it’s been long since I played it…
however, were there any other major games that were made completely in 3d? i would include brave fencer musashi but… it was very cartoony
They looked like porcelan dolls, it just looked sooooo soooo bad.
though thats more character design than graphics, but it still applies.
Tri-Ace generally has shitty games.
WHAT CASSIE?! I SAID IT!
Laaaame plot. Breeze to complete since you can power up your equipment to Seraphic Gate-level values around mid-game. And the characters are all wimps, bar one. Which is the generic anti-hero, so it also shows originality the middle finger.
Final Fantasy X-2 – What did we do to get served this dog’s breakfast. Seriously, I can’t think of what SE was smoking at the time they thought this up, but considering how the game was… I had to say that whatever it was, it was only the cheap grade grass.
Final Fantasy XII – A Star Wars rip off imo, and a poorly executed one at that. Story was old, and with the character’s dancing around like they were… it sunk faster than the Titanic.
The Bouncer – …. What the hell was SE thinking with this piece of monkey excrement? I’ve had better looking skidmarks in my damn underwear, than this piece of shit. SE trying to redo Double Dragon… and fail… miserably.
Halo 3 – I admit, I enjoyed Halo 2. May not of been everyone’s fav of the series, but it was enjoyable. This instalment of the Halo franchise… Bungie… here’s some advice : If you want to show how to make a game flatter than Sigourney Weaver’s ass, you succeeded. Well done.
Grand Theft Auto IV – Ok… this game initially showed promise… But then after playing for about two minutes or so, getting your fat cousin ringing up all the time, to go and have a bite to eat, get a drink, or go and see ‘Big American Titties’, WHILE trying to do a mission… fuck that shit. Even worse when you have a girlfriend in the game, and she rings you up to annoy you… often right in the middle of a mission…
There are other games I could list here… but already I have the urge to go and smash myself in the face with a cheese grater due to the piles of crap I’ve listed above…
But I digress…disappointing games for me have included:
Fire Emblem Path of Radiance and Radiant Dawn(part of the fun of the previous games was pairing people up and seeing their special endings at the end…but nnnnoooo…IS thinks it’s better that we have a stock storyline!:mad: )
Rumble Roses and RRXX(I was disappointed in each for different reasons…RR for limitations, and RRXX for absolutely no story)
Castlevania Bloodlines(the change in weaponry didn’t help its relative shortness)
Cyber-Cop(everything an FPS should NOT be!)
Shadowrun(having grown up with the P&P, I didn’t feel the SNES one captured the atmosphere, and the Genesis one was INSANELY hard! Those are the only two versions…I repeat, those are the ONLY TWO!)
Any RTS game brought to console(seriously WTF?!? RTS games are not made for consoles, so stop putting them on there!)
Grand Theft Auto IV – A good game, however I enjoyed San Andreas far more, and coming off the heels of that, I felt overall it was a somewhat disappointing game.
Assassins Creed – Great for the first while, however missions soon become redundant and repetitive, didn’t live up to the hype it received.
There are others; however these games were the major disappointments.
btw xiahou dun, totally agree with everything you said, except the graphics were still damn good in the FMVs for FFX, the story however was linear and obvious. Noone likes a story that involves churches or cults betraying your main character, because in the end, you kind of expect it from the beginning.
Jesus, you think everyone has a lesser I.Q than you, but your the only one who doesn’t read between the lines.
/FACEPALM
Everquest 2, played that for a half hour and then stopped… can’t believe I bought a year subscription before starting it… the trial island was good though…
GoW 2 definitely, story was atrocious and plot-holed, though so was DoW 2, but the story was better in that, oh and GoW 1… well that story was pretty bad as well, too much focus on combat not enough on story, and the combat was lame and repetitive.
Everquest 2, played that for a half hour and then stopped… can’t believe I bought a year subscription before starting it… the trial island was good though…
GoW 2 definitely, story was atrocious and plot-holed, though so was DoW 2, but the story was better in that, oh and GoW 1… well that story was pretty bad as well, too much focus on combat not enough on story, and the combat was lame and repetitive.
Might want to clarify your anagrams there, buddy. Do you mean GEARS of War, or GOD of War?
I meant Gears of War though.
If you want it now, don’t get it for the story. Because it sucks.
And Castlevania: Dawn of Sorrow. When I played that game I never knew what to do after a cutscene. They don’t tell you, and there’s not
even at least a hint system! It’s just you running around trying to figure out if you’re supposed to keep going a certain way. Then the final boss is some guy you can kill in like 10 seconds. God, I hate that game… Good thing I didn’t actually buy it.
bazooka cafe
they are lack of content
Oh. And the soundtrack sucks.
Oh. And the soundtrack sucks.
Definetely agree with everything you’ve said and also i’d like to add, the storyline is REALLY weak. no-one has guns except the FBI agent :S
Are you completely insane!?
MGS4 is like the redemption of it all. 1 was the best undeniably. 2 was over faster than a night with 2 virgins, and 3 was just irritating except fighting the end and the joy, it was far to simple to just grab a MK2 a tranq anyone who got close to you, on hardest difficulty i didnt even die once, which is saying alot for an MGS game.
4 you had the soundtrack, the strategy, the stealth was FINALLY back, the adrenaline, you have the decent boss battles again (even if 2 are complete re-inactments from MGS1) you have the best bit of 3 the bike chase, you get your liquid fight, you get rex vs ray (everyone likes mech battles), you’ve even got posing for a camera from the bosses if you run away long enough, not to mention if u hold up a frog unit and search her, u get called a perv or they enjoy it lol
the ONLY bad part about that game is the damn monkey and drebin, especially when he shouts "here they come!" before the raiden fight, ruined the whole atmosphere of coolness, like when you seen gray fox again and then otacon pissed himself ;P
Apparently the strategy RPG genre is not for me as I absolutely hate this game LOL
Looking forward to playing the 3rd one.
MGS4 is like the redemption of it all. 1 was the best undeniably. 2 was over faster than a night with 2 virgins, and 3 was just irritating except fighting the end and the joy, it was far to simple to just grab a MK2 a tranq anyone who got close to you, on hardest difficulty i didnt even die once, which is saying alot for an MGS game.
4 you had the soundtrack, the strategy, the stealth was FINALLY back, the adrenaline, you have the decent boss battles again (even if 2 are complete re-inactments from MGS1) you have the best bit of 3 the bike chase, you get your liquid fight, you get rex vs ray (everyone likes mech battles), you’ve even got posing for a camera from the bosses if you run away long enough, not to mention if u hold up a frog unit and search her, u get called a perv or they enjoy it lol
the ONLY bad part about that game is the damn monkey and drebin, especially when he shouts "here they come!" before the raiden fight, ruined the whole atmosphere of coolness, like when you seen gray fox again and then otacon pissed himself ;P
…Let the guy have his fucking opinion.
i just bought because i prefer to play that over batman and robin on the same system.
both robin and batman have the same voice and when they are hit they sound like they had an orgasm.
F.E.A.R. – I was expecting this really scary game, but what I got was a mediocore game at best, with not enough action for my tastes.
Zelda: Phantom Hourglass – I’ve never loved Zelda portable games, so I wasn’t expecting much from this game, but I was really annoyed by this game. The controls just threw me off entirely.
Ok, on 7 I thought "that was a waste of time" rather than it sucked.
– Final Fantasy Tactics (there should’ve been more to it)
Oh, and to stay on topic:
Super Mario RPG. God, how I was disappointed in it.
So, I went to my friend’s, and I tried it. I started the game. So, you have to go where your sword points and slay giants. Cool. I love slaying giants. After like an half hour of riding through the place, and climbing that stupid cliff, I found that asshole. I had no idea what to do, though. My friend tried to guide me through that (very first!) battle by coaching, but I still failed because the controls are so frigging horrible with this game. He took the controller from me and played instead. I watched him. And I had a very nice talk with his boyfriend about various topics, including other games, politics, neighbours and so on. It was very a entertaining conversation. We quit though when he beat that electric eel boss and I went home.
I seriously recommend Shadow of the Colossus to be played while talking just like when you hang out with your friends and the TV is running in the background. When the topic you talk about dies off, you can watch that guy playing Shadow of the Colossus and think of something else. It’s pretty awesome.
But the game itself is meh. I dunno what’s so awesome. Sure, it looks nice and I mean, slaying giants is awesome. I can’t think of anyone who doesn’t like slaying giants. I mean, I like the idea of the game in general, too, it’s new. With the battles being essentially action-based puzzles and whatnot. But I dunno, this idea could’ve had much more potential. Especially with controls that aren’t shit.
Final Fantasy X-2 – I had the good sense to never get near FFX-2 after seeing the trailer for it, and I’m glad I never did.
Final Fantasy Tactics Advance Way to take one of the greatest SRPG’s ever made and dumb it down to a third-grader’s level. I remember when I started it, the first thing that came to my mind was "A snowball fight? Really?" Terrible game, I don’t even think I bothered to finish that garbage.
Final Fantasy XII – I used to consider myself a FF fan, but looking at this list, I’m thinking otherwise. Another crappy game that everybody overhyped and I just flat-out hated. The only FF game, other than FFTA that I never beat. Garbage.
After first Halo, I had to recheck at least ten times that I bought the right game.
Sonic the Hedgehog (360) – Sonic Adventure this is not.
King of Fighters XII
Viewtiful Joe: Red Hot Rumble
Shadow of the Colossus – Sure it’s got great art direction and music, but it felt like there was this all this open space for nothing. I just kept fighting bosses and that was it. With some short platforming sequences inbetween of course.
Sonic Unleashed – Minus the Werehog and this is a fantastic game waiting to happen.
Elebits
Raven Squad – Nice concept at first but in the end this game was lmao bad. The voice acting is hilarious.
Naruto: Clash of Ninja Revolution – Less characters in exchange for what? Waggle controls that do little to nothing? Gekitou Ninja Taisen 4 is where it’s at. Revolution 2 came close but replaced the sound four with a bunch of anbu and made-up jack-offs and a retarted exclusive storyline.
Naruto: Uzumaki Chronicles – The opening made this game look so cool…
Street Fighter Ex – Who decided that 3D street fighter was a good thing?
Star Wars: The Force Unleashed – I’m sorry, in it’s own right, this is a great game, but I followed this game from the beginning and it didn’t live up to what I expected.
Soul Calibur IV – This was just a mindless button masher to me that tried way too hard to put more story and bigger boobs onto a once near perfect formula. Soul Calibur II this is not.
In my case was MGS3. Why?
Metal Gear Solid(PS1) was a great game with a gameplay new for myself by the time it came out, the storyline and the characters are very unique.
Metal Gear Solid 2 was a good game, good gameplay, very fun, the storyline is still good, while the characters are not so good, this game has the fame to be hated because of Raiden, but after some years later i realized that it wasn’t raiden who ruined the game, it’s Rose, and the other characters weren’t that surprising either in comparison to the previous installment.
But with Metal Gear Solid 3, the gameplay was improved in some ways, the characters some were good and some others were just nothing, Naked Snake is a Weapon and Warfare nerd, Ocelot was devaluated making him into a stupid feminine personality jerk. But then the worse of all, "The Cobra Unit" separating The Boss from this ones, they’re the power rangers without any kind of personality, "you will feel THE PAIN!" "you will know THE FEAR", "It will be THE END for you.", "THE FURY!!". What the hell is that dude, what happened with Psycho Mantis, with Sniper Wolf, EVEN VULCAN RAVEN IS BETTER THAN THAT GANG OF POWER RANGERS. And no one knows about from where they get their powers or how. Oh, I forgot to mention the hover flying chairs in the 1960’s.
The storyline of MGS3 was good, clears more the origins of "the patriots".
I’ve still not played MGS4, as soon as I get a PS3, that will be the first game to beat, i have faith that this Metal Gear Solid will be better that 2 and 3.
Other disappointment FFIX, the go back to it’s roots game was a dissapointment for me, some characters were good (Vivi and Beatrix), but the other ones….. Quina is a filler, Amarant is a filler, Zidane has no charm, garnet is another rinoa, steiner is a jackass, Freya was ok. Kuja is disgusting in my opinion. The worse of all, the gameplay, the battles are so fucking slow man, the atb bar takes eons to fill, the learning abilities system has no strategic value to me, equiping items so a character can learn an abillity after bustin your ass fighting to get the AP was not cool at all. The random encounter rate has increased notably adding that the speed of the battles which i already mentioned. The storyline is an improvement in comparsion to the previous installment, I’ll give you that.
Another disappointing game that comes to my mind is Castlevania Curse of Darkness, known among my friends as "TamagochiVania". The Music was Ok, Lament of innocence got better music. The gameplay was partially good, in terms of fighting, but the thing that makes attractive the castlevania series in my opinion are the design of the maps, this castlevania has no good map, NO, NOT EVEN ONE PART OF THE GAME IS WORTH EXPLORING. Everything is reduced to [corridor – room] and the mountain levels have nothing to jump, Castlevania was a platform game, in this castlevania THERE ARE NO PLATFORMS TO JUMP.
I have the faith that the next Castlevania will be better than SOTN.
Sorry about the language, but I couldn’t control myself. ^^
Digimon World 3
Twisted Metal Black
Twisted Metal small brawl
It was boring as fuck… And the fact that most parts in the game to upgrade your units were hard to afford for all your troops (and you truly need at least everyone in tip-top fighting shape) without cheating… YEAH. And I don’t think any game after that or Front Mission 5 will be any better. I think the series stopped being good after game 3 (for the record, I’ve only played the first game of the series, both on SNES emulator and on the DS legit), and Square Enix’s attempt to revive it into a Third-person shooter might blow harder than any Armord Core game out there.
Square Enix may have been able to evolve the RPG with the Kingdom Hearts games, but if you ever took a look at Dirge of Cerberus, you too will hopefully see that these guys suck at making third-person shooter, which is why I don’t have any more high hopes for this dead horse of a series. Sad, I feel this way, too. Front Mission was an awesome, though VERY VERY pretentious take on militairy life and affairs worldwide, and how they would evolve both combat and technology worldwide, rather than the rest of the world along with it.
Then again, so is anything military-like in ANY AND ALL of the Final Fantasy games…
Armored Core: Nexus:
This game just sucked ASS with capital letters. But Just like Front Mission 4, if I forget to mention, the music was Kickass, but that’s it. Shitty controls, unfair AI, customization, though deep, that cannot help against such tough to near-impossible to beat AI, boring to cliche-assed storyline and plot… i could go on…
Even with cheat codes, It’s still no fun (having to cheat in the first place, especially at a bad game, even though I cheat plenty at video games when no one is playing them with me, to be honest enough, is a weak gesture IMHO.)
Sad, too. Just like the war-story, I love and will try to al leat to give anything a chance if it has giant city-smashing-or-protecting robots (mecha) in it…
It’s thanks to this game that I regret such an ideal of thought on my mind to this day.
Then again, The Armored Core series in its entirity just sucks total ass, as every game is like what I just mentioned. I haven’t played these games to be honest with anyone who reads this, and I don’t want to after the experiences I had with Nexus, knowing every game before and after it sucks due to these flaws I have pointed out…
but if you ever took a look at Dirge of Cerberus, you too will hopefully see that these guys suck at making third-person shooter
Actually I think they know and may be why they are farming it out to another studio. Also Front Mission 4 was awesome.
That’s some good news… Just as long as it’s not the guys responsible for the Armored Core games…
Should have just refined the series in its original form. I like Front Mission, but the games got dull as hell. FM3 was the last one I really enjoyed.
Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass – I guess it’s fun for people new to the Zelda series, but this too was also easy, compared to the other Zelda games.
Children of Mana – Didn’t know what to expect, but was hoping that each character had his/her own individual story. Every stage was just button mashing through monsters then fighting a boss at the end of the stage. The story wasn’t enough to keep me interested.
Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood – Still, wasn’t expecting much. The dialog in the game was pretty funny and it was good not to hear Jason Griffith’s voice for once. Still, that didn’t stop it from being a letdown. The battles got really repetitive and some of the sound effects used in battle were recycled from earlier Sonic games and really out of place. The music wasn’t very impressive (I’m not sure, but I’ve heard that most of the music were just bad remixes from earlier Sonic games, mainly 3D Blast). I guess it’s a good game for people who are getting into RPGs.
You should probably check out at least one review for a game before you buy it. Pretty much all reviews I’ve seen for Starfy have said that it’s extremely easy.
Then again, that’s what Molyneux said. 😛
I second this.
Battlefield: Vietnam, while not really considered worth mentioning, is by far my favorite of the whole BF series.
The chance to ride vehicles and having those 60s/70s music playing as you wreck havoc (imagine "Surfin’ Bird – is the word" or "Wild thing, you make my heart sing", being heard by your prey as you gun them down), having insult-spamming Viet-Cong buddies just in ravaged pants run with you and crazy cityfights are just one of many factors I had enjoyed.
BF2 screwed everything and every hope for something similar 🙁
Disappointing games for me:
Might and Magic Nine
Wizards and Warriors
Tabula Rasa
The online play is just a fucking joke, but maybe its because of the area I’m in.
Once you finish the single player, theres not much left to do.
Compared to Melee, the fighting seems a bit slow, in my opinion. And they also took most of the fun glitch/bug tricks out too.
Unless you have a few friends who are willing to come to your house to play, or vise-versa, this game blows.
Final Fantasy X-2 – What did we do to get served this dog’s breakfast. Seriously, I can’t think of what SE was smoking at the time they thought this up, but considering how the game was… I had to say that whatever it was, it was only the cheap grade grass.
Final Fantasy XII – A Star Wars rip off imo, and a poorly executed one at that. Story was old, and with the character’s dancing around like they were… it sunk faster than the Titanic.
The Bouncer – …. What the hell was SE thinking with this piece of monkey excrement? I’ve had better looking skidmarks in my damn underwear, than this piece of shit. SE trying to redo Double Dragon… and fail… miserably.
Halo 3 – I admit, I enjoyed Halo 2. May not of been everyone’s fav of the series, but it was enjoyable. This instalment of the Halo franchise… Bungie… here’s some advice : If you want to show how to make a game flatter than Sigourney Weaver’s ass, you succeeded. Well done.
Grand Theft Auto IV – Ok… this game initially showed promise… But then after playing for about two minutes or so, getting your fat cousin ringing up all the time, to go and have a bite to eat, get a drink, or go and see ‘Big American Titties’, WHILE trying to do a mission… fuck that shit. Even worse when you have a girlfriend in the game, and she rings you up to annoy you… often right in the middle of a mission…
There are other games I could list here… but already I have the urge to go and smash myself in the face with a cheese grater due to the piles of crap I’ve listed above…
I’d also like to add to the above:
Sacred 2: Fallen Angel – I had such high hopes for this game, as I had been drawn in due to trailers of this game available for download off Xbox Live, and having played the first one (And thinking that was an ‘Ok’ game), I honestly thought this was going to be good. I was wrong. Gameplay wise it was only mediocre imo, nothing to write home about. The whole game was that… Mediocre. Save your money and invest in another game.
Fable II – For the same reasons listed by Exorade.
At any rate, the most disappointing game I can really say I’ve ever played was Doom 3’s expansion, Resurrection of Evil. I know that’s merely an expansion pack and really shouldn’t count, but that’s my honest answer. It lived up to NONE of the expectations I had, nor the anticipation after seeing screenshots and demo videos.
Blitzball, for me, was fantastic. You could basically customize your team (although I really just used Tidus and a defense), and it was an aspect of the game you could turn too if you got tired of grinding through the story.
X-2’s blitzball, however, makes me want to kill myself.
Having been led to expect a gripping story, interesting characters, and addicting combat, I was disappointed to receive a meh story with no main character, side characters that had no appeal besides a few that have limited time within the story (Vossler, Reddas), and the combat is both too easy with quickenings and too snore inducing with gambits.
Having been led to expect a gripping story, interesting characters, and addicting combat, I was disappointed to receive a meh story with no main character, side characters that had no appeal besides a few that have limited time within the story (Vossler, Reddas), and the combat is both too easy with quickenings and too snore inducing with gambits.
Totally the opposite to what I feel about the game.
I think the story was great, different & there’s a lot to investigate about the lore of the game on the "Sage Knowledge".
The "no main character" is something that makes the game more appealing to me (maybe that’s another reason that I hate Ashe, she’s the more near thing to protagonist in the game), is like playing a module of table-top RPG, where the characters that the players perform are not the important thing in the game or the storyline, is what happens around them that makes it interesting, the only problem that I have with the storyline is the filler part that starts after prologue & ends when you enter Nalbina Dungeons.
And about the battle system it’s very free, it gives you the possibility to make it fun or boring, challenging or easy, it depends on how are you going to play it.
Besides as I said before I’ll say it again, to me XII is not a Final Fantasy Game.
Sad that you were dissapointed. Almost the same happened to me with MGS3.
Woah woah woah, what didn’t you like about MGS3?
I did not like FFXII because…
– The main villain was dumb (in my opinion). Initially, they seem to set up Vayne as some sort of diplomatic mastermind, but really all he ends up doing is strong arming everyone with magic or magicite or with his secret police equivalent in the Judges. Then, as I began to acquire some measure of respect for him later in the game, it is revealed that everything he has done has been as a puppet, that the true enemies are the gods or whatever (Venat), completely ruining any sense of respect I had for the character. Imagine if they had revealed that Emperor Palpatine in Star Wars had been possessed by Satan right before Luke fights him. While I suppose some people would say, "Fuck yeah!" I would say that that completely ruins the character. Which it did for me.
– Speaking of Star Wars, there are absurd amounts of Star Wars parallels. Balthier = Han. Fran = Chewie. Ashe = Leia. And so on and so on. It has been discussed before, but this made the story not terribly interesting to me. The only point in the story I found interesting was the background behind the Marquis and his ‘faction’, which played, in the end, a rather minimal part in the whole story.
– The characters seemed very one dimensional to me, for the most part. Balthier is the smuggler with the heart of gold (sound familiar?), Ashe is the princess trying to regain her kingdom, Vaan is an insufferable pest who swiftly becomes irrelevant in the story, Penelo is the female version of Vaan, Fran is the Wookiee exile with a life debt to Balthier… I could go on. The only characters who kept my interest were Larsa, Vossler, and Reddas; all minor characters who you don’t control.
– The combat system just seemed tedious to me. If we ignore the fact that quickenings have the ability to instagib anything that isn’t some high level hunt, we still have the gambit system that allows the game to play itself. All you have to do is use the joystick to move your characters into battle, and if you are intelligent with the gambits then the game plays itself. The only battles that I only felt really involved in were the Elder Green Dragon of infinite status disruptions and the last fight of the Leviathan (or whatever that star destroyer was called). Everything else was just a walk in the park. Now I suppose I could have disabled the gambit system and refused to use quickenings, but I had no interest in doing that. After all, why would I want to slow myself down? I’m not the kind of gamer who enjoys running games with self-limits.
All in all, these are the reasons I disliked it. The story and characters issue was the major catch for me, as I tend to prefer games with strengths in those areas. But, to each his own. I’m not trying to say that nobody can enjoy it. I’m just explaining why I didn’t.
The Star Wars references are, of course, easily spotted. However, there are more references in other FF games, so XII isn’t the first FF game to include these. Also, there isn’t any ‘rule’ or such that prohibits these references. I can understand why some people don’t like them, but I don’t think they ruin the game.
The characters are somewhat limited in development/cookie cut builds, but I think they game is more storyline driven than character driven. I also like most of the characters (with the exception of Vaan, and some Penelo). I also like the guest characters the most, and I think they were guests exactly for that reason; to draw and keep the attention to the storyline.
As for the Gambit System, I like it. It allows the player to manage a party or personally control each character. If you’re replaying the game it allows you to speed through endless battles, or if you’re playing it for the first time, it allows complete control over what everyone does. I myself set basic healing gambits and input the rest (spells, techs, item usage) by hand. I think that is a balance of both sides of it, where it keeps me occupied, yet I don’t have to keep too much focus to slay a pack of wolves for the 100th time.
I can understand why you make the points you do, I just wanted to give my opinion.
Blitzball was a great minigame and it was very easy to understand. It had a lot of depth for a minigame and the rewards for playing it (which was already fun) made it so much better. I even liked the Blitzball in X-2 since it was less time consuming but still had the same amount of depth as the first.
Speaking of X and X-2 – both were great games. The music in X was great and the graphics were good for a title released in 2001. I’m not really sure why people hate X so much. One grating reason for me is the, "Tidus is emo xD" line which… really isn’t true. X-2 was great because it easily had the best gameplay in the series (not anymore with XIII out) and the story really wasn’t all that bad. It was a lighthearted game that showed how things had picked up for Spira once the whole Sin problem was removed
Besides the slaughtering of countless mobs that is. 😉
That’s just the post-Sin cleanup.
But I understand why you like it. Sadly, for me it was a disappointment.
Forgot all about Risen. I think I complained pretty specifically elsewhere though. So what put you off?
They were paying respects to a classic (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujKvmEp8k6Q).
/take mouth
/insert foot
/congratulations
I personally love sports/sports games. I only play them online or with friends, but they’re great fun (mainly if you’re competitive) 😉
Did you make it to the end boss? …Not that it’s worth it.
/insert foot
/congratulations
I personally love sports/sports games. I only play them online or with friends, but they’re great fun (mainly if you’re competitive) 😉
Also, one of the most popular RPGs released in Japan last year was Inazuma Eleven 2, a soccer game, which probably reached a million sales over new years. Sports and Roleplaying is a great mix.
Really I’m all for roleplaying and just about anything that isn’t running around hitting monsters with weapons.
Games that can be completed in the same time it takes to fart? Fantastic…
But… i didn’t care for Blitz. Played prob a dozen matches total.
Many things actually, but If get the energy I’ll make a long post to put it clear, there’s a previous post in this same thread that I stated some of the many things that I didn’t liked about the game.
Imagine if they had revealed that Emperor Palpatine in Star Wars had been possessed by Satan right before Luke fights him. While I suppose some people would say, "Fuck yeah!" I would say that that completely ruins the character. Which it did for me.
All in all, these are the reasons I disliked it. The story and characters issue was the major catch for me, as I tend to prefer games with strengths in those areas. But, to each his own. I’m not trying to say that nobody can enjoy it. I’m just explaining why I didn’t.
XD! That’s Hilarious.
It’s okay man, no one is pointing you with the finger, I was dissapointed with FFVI almost in the same way too.
Did you make it to the end boss? …Not that it’s worth it.
No, I got to the part where they wanted me to collect the four pieces of the Armor of Ultimate MacGuffinry and decided I was done.
After the mixture of TM1 and the epicness of TM2, TM3 was just ‘bleh’ and TM4 was shit.
At least ‘Small Brawl’ was ok and TM: Black was great.
Head-On was also pretty good.
And it was ugly, had horrific sound, the worst voice acting I’ve heard since the Sega CD, and the battle system was irritating.
Agreed…..The only reason I kept playing it was because I kept thinking, "this is horrible, but I’ll keep playing cause it has to get better…I mean it is FINAL FANTASY afterall!" and then ‘The End’ finally pops up and I’m like gaping at how bad it was and how it never did get better like I’d hoped 🙁
The battle system was something new and it had its fun points, but it personally made me miss random encounters. Nothing about that game felt like FF to me…..all FF games are different, but being a part of the franchise they should have some consistency imo….I cannot believe this game got good scores. I do have to say, the hunts were pretty fun to do though. I am still excited about XIII possibly making up for it! 😀
At any rate, I’ve thought of a game I’ve played that is severely more disappointing to me than my previous post. This one disappointed me so much, I played it once, but never again since.
Age of Empires: Mythologies for DS.
No, I did not research the game before buying, which is my own mistake. I should have. But still, needless to say, I was very let down upon playing it, expecting it to be the same kind of experience as Age of Mythology for PC. Instead, I get a tactical game with little to no resemblance to AoM. I love tactical games, namely FFTactics, but I can’t say enough that there’s a time and place for everything. I wanted AoM; instead, I got something far different. Very, very disappointing purchase.
They’re a different experience for sure, but given that there’s yet to be a GREAT RTS for the DS…
Hey, why not?
While I’ve enjoyed the AoE series since its start, way back when, the DS games knew their place and I praise the developer for making a game that plays to the strength of the DS.
Some games, like COP or CORE try something different and don’t do very well at it.
It’s more a testament to the weakness of the DS I think.
Zelda
KH
Resident Evil
Silent Hill
Alone in the Dark
Halo
Gears of War
GTA
Assassins creed
Dungeons and Dragons
Manhunt
Left 4 Dead
Legion of Fire
Resident Evil
Final Fantasy I, II, X, X-2, and XI
Runescape
Halo 2
The new Sonic games
Ghost Recon
Oblivion (never could really get into it.)
Any sports game
And Akillyz (welcome to FFShrine!) just jogged my memory of two that I could’ve said in here earlier, but they’re so god-awful, I totally forgot about them. Well, ‘any sports game’ pretty much sums that right up. I’m right there with ya on that. And Ghost Recon; totally not my cup of tea. Realism has its boundaries, which shouldn’t be crossed; it is a game, after all. Or rather, supposed to be.
*possible mild spoilers ahead–nothing major, but better safe than sorry*
Metal Gear Solid 2 is probably the biggest disappointment I’ve ever played. The first one was brilliant, and the demo was full of win. But after the the ship, bleh. Teh. Suck. Granted, I made it all the way through MGS2 at least once. I didn’t make it more than an hour into MGS3. After getting spotted multiple times from a mile away laying completely still with like, 95% camo, I finally spiked the controller and said "fuck this shit."
Chrono Cross is another disappointing game for me. Having been touted as a sequel to CT, I was quite thrilled. And then the game wasn’t very good at all. Miguel in particular gave me quite a few controller-spiking, "fuck this shit" moments.
Halo 2 was a disappointment. I played the hell out of it with my friends, but it was a letdown after the first one. We actually went back to the original after a while so we could play our beloved shotguns/infinite grenades game.
RE5 was another disappointment to me. The controls felt awkward, especially after playing RE4 on Wii. The inventory system was shit, and the partner AI was intelligent in name only.
Kingdom Hearts 2 is another disappointment. I was bored to death before by the time I got to play as Sora. Then I got to Mulan World and decided the game wasn’t worth the trouble.
I notice a trend of disappointing sequels to good games. Perhaps we as consumers (me in particular) could stand to learn a lesson or three here.
FFVII was a disappointment, as well (yeah, I went there!), mostly because of the insane amount of hype it got prior to release. It had some cool moments, but overall, a disappointment in my book.
Why the f*ck do you not like MGS2?! The first one was great, and the 2nd was bigger and better. I really don’t see what the problem is. Haven’t tried MGS3 or 4 yet but I’m sure they’re not disappointments in any way.
*possible mild spoilers ahead–nothing major, but better safe than sorry*
Metal Gear Solid 2 is probably the biggest disappointment I’ve ever played. The first one was brilliant, and the demo was full of win. But after the the ship, bleh. Teh. Suck. Granted, I made it all the way through MGS2 at least once. I didn’t make it more than an hour into MGS3. After getting spotted multiple times from a mile away laying completely still with like, 95% camo, I finally spiked the controller and said "fuck this shit."
Chrono Cross is another disappointing game for me. Having been touted as a sequel to CT, I was quite thrilled. And then the game wasn’t very good at all. Miguel in particular gave me quite a few controller-spiking, "fuck this shit" moments.
RE5 was another disappointment to me. The controls felt awkward, especially after playing RE4 on Wii. The inventory system was shit, and the partner AI was intelligent in name only.
You know I’ve actually heard this a lot from many different people.
Why the f*ck do you not like MGS2?! The first one was great, and the 2nd was bigger and better. I really don’t see what the problem is. Haven’t tried MGS3 or 4 yet but I’m sure they’re not disappointments in any way.
MGS2 was a dissapointment at the begninning to me, but eventually things turn interesting after the Harrier fight, so starting from that portion of the game till the last fight it kinda redeemed the whole game, it had the best gameplay from all the MGS games that I played (I didn’t played 4 yet) & when you fully understand the storyline it’s a really nice game. But it’s not better than one. Wanna know why? 3 things.
First, Rose
Second, Raiden
Third, the design of the big shell is not as good as the base of shadow moses in game 1. There are no Open fields on MGS 2 & no, a large bridge conecting to buildings is not and Open field.
Fourth, the characters some may be good, but they are not as nearly as interesting as the ones of the first game.
Sorry I care A LOT about the story & characters when it comes to Metal Gear.
*A LONG AN SPOILING RANT BEGINS HERE*
MGS3 was another story, many people I know used to tell me things like "It’s the best MGS" or "It’s better than 2" or "Even better that 1", I even know someone who have the courage to tell me, "It’s the best game I’ve ever played in my life". I found it hard to believe, but since the setting was a little different maybe it was because of that, but that’s not my point.
MGS3 is the worse of them all IMO, the gameplay was wrecked, they’ve tried to put things that didn’t worked with the regular Metal Gear Formula, the health system for instance was more action oriented & it didn’t worked well, it’s pretty hard for the guards to kill you, so what do we do if the guards have hard time at killing you? WE PUT A WOUND SYSTEM, oh yeah, it’s a nice idea, but it didn’t worked, why?, because you have to interrupt the game every second to heal yourself & it’s boring to do that & you also heal yourself overtime, "DOCTOR DOCTOR I BROKE MY ARM, WHAT DO I DO?" doctor says "At ease son, just sit down for a few minutes & your arm will be like new". I slightly prefer the old health system with the Rations, in game 1 they could kill you with 4 shots at the beginning on Normal Difficulty, here in 3 the could use a whole magazine of an AK & your health will still be at least 70%.
The Cameras, since now we found ourselves in a jungle an open space, the regular Metal Gear Camera will not work, so why bother to use it?, I don’t know, OH OH SORRY, in subsistence we could switch from 3rd person to normal, yeah, that’s a good idea, ONLY IF WASN’T HARD TO SET IT PROPERLY, you have to move it constantly because it doesn’t move unless yo do it.
The camouflage system, wasn’t so bad, I kinda liked it but it’s the same as the health/wound system, it interrupts the game a lot. Maybe you have problems with that because now the guards have a much better AI.
The Storyline, the storyline was good overall, metal gear always featured a nice storyline, my problem with it?, it’s like the 5th time we use the "RESCUE THE SCIENTIST IN DISTRESS" mobil, other thing, THE COBRA UNIT, but I’ll get to that later.
The Setting, we found ourselves 1960’s in the middle of the cold war, with… flying chairs!?. Nice move.
The Characters, where do we start, the protagonist Naked Snake (2nd thoughts?), we found this Snake slightly different from the Solid we knew from the previous games, this snake is more inocent, yet sometimes we found him like more arrogant, but there’s certain female character in his prescence he kinda loses himself, I think this is more fitting to an Anime rather than a metal gear.
Ocelot, this is like the regular "OH MY GOD WHAT HAVE THEY’VE DONE TO YOU!?", Ocelot is as silly as hell in this metal gear, I can’t believe that the mastermind behind all is this Ocelot, a ridicule stupid, yet arrogant character that gets himself put in shame all the time, Again this is more fitting to an Anime.
But that’s not as bothering as THE COBRA UNIT, yeah, the fucking cobra unit.
Yeah, remember when the bosses used to have some nice, deep storylines & motivations in the previous MGS games, well, here we break that tradition.
The stupidest characters in metal gear solid ever we found them in this pack,
THE PAAAAAAAIIINNNNNNNNN, man, this guy can controls bees at his own will, why or how?, don’t ask me, the funny thing about this guy that he ambushes you in a place where he’s at disadvantage.
THE FEEAR, well this guy, uses a semi-automatic crossbow, Optic camouflage (1960’s) & he dislocate his extremities to he can move as a spider in the jungle, the hardest boss battle in the game In my opinion.
THE END, okay we now find an old man who is suposedly have like 100 years old, since his birth is at the beginning of the 1860 decade, moss grows inside and outside his body so he can use photosynthesis to survive without eating, he may have 100 years old, but he runs faster than you, the fight with this guy unlike every other boss fight in the game within these power rangers, it’s interesting, it’s an open field battle of snipers divided that can go through 3 screens, at least that’s the idea, but I beat him by punching his face, since it’s hard to use the sniper in this game because, remember we’re using a joystick, not a mouse.
THE FURY, arguably the worse of them all, the fury uses a thermal suit with jets with a flame thrower power ranger style, this fight is the most boring battle in the metal gear series, the camera is the worse shit ever on this fight, you can only damage him if you punch him, stun grenades or shooting at his helmet, because that suit appears to be bulletproof.
What’s most funny about this bunch of Power Rangers is that they’ve even tried to give them some Punch lines, such as "You will feel THE PAAAIIINNNN!". "The spirits of the forest have spoken to me, it will be THE END, for you". FUCK THESE CHARACTERS, I WANT PSYCHO MANTIS & SNIPER WOLF BACK.
Then we have Volgin a soviet Pikachu Soldier that can discharge 1.000.000 V out of his body, how? I don’t know, don’t ask me. but his personallity was good & the most funny thing about this character is that he’s bisexual.
Now these are the bad points about Metal Gear Solid 3 IMO, because they contradict the previous games, Remember when in MGS2, Ocelot said near at the end of the game "There’s no such thing as the supernatural, only cutting-edge technology" based on that I can’t possibly understand why they’ve done these things in MGS3.
*LONG & SPOILING RANT ENDS HERE*
Chrono Cross was a great game to me, having played Chrono Trigger before, I was specting a good game, with a great storyline, though I found the gameplay odd at the beginning & yet at the end annoying, the storyline kept me hooked to the very end, the music was awesome, but the only BIG FLAW about CC is that since it’s gameplay becomes more tedious as you go through the game, the Replay Value dissapears.
RE 5, what can I say I hated 4 & 5 is no different than 4, you hate your partners AI?, Man that’s tradition to any Capcom game, your partner never helps you.
While I won’t deny CT’s great, classic status, I find myself playing and enjoying CC more.
Why the f*ck do you not like MGS2?! The first one was great, and the 2nd was bigger and better. I really don’t see what the problem is. Haven’t tried MGS3 or 4 yet but I’m sure they’re not disappointments in any way.
I didn’t like MGS2 because everything after the ship was a rehash of the original, just with characters that ranged from the mildly annoying to the downright insipid. It also seemed to me that this was the point where Kojima began using his game as a soapbox, which pisses me off. Ret-conning also annoys the hell out of me.
RE 5, what can I say I hated 4 & 5 is no different than 4, you hate your partners AI?, Man that’s tradition to any Capcom game, your partner never helps you.
That doesn’t diminish the fact that it completely sucked. If their partner AI’s are always bad, perhaps they should stop putting the fucking things in their games.
It’s a rehash of the original with every reason to be, if you pay attention to the storyline, if not, yeah it will suck BIG TIME.
And Akillyz (welcome to FFShrine!) just jogged my memory of two that I could’ve said in here earlier, but they’re so god-awful, I totally forgot about them. Well, ‘any sports game’ pretty much sums that right up. I’m right there with ya on that. And Ghost Recon; totally not my cup of tea. Realism has its boundaries, which shouldn’t be crossed; it is a game, after all. Or rather, supposed to be.
Thanks for the welcome.
You know I’ve actually heard this a lot from many different people.
Why the f*ck do you not like MGS2?! The first one was great, and the 2nd was bigger and better. I really don’t see what the problem is. Haven’t tried MGS3 or 4 yet but I’m sure they’re not disappointments in any way.
Smarty, MGS2 sucked. I hated the whole game. The only amusing part was at the end where everything starts screwing up. "Fission Mailed!" is on of them. I’ve played and beat MGS1 and MGS3. In my opinion, MGS3 was the best.
3 is the worse to me, 2 is good if you know what really is the objective of the game, and 1 is the best of all, it’s almost flawless & it introduced a lot of things to gaming in general.
Just so you know, the "you didn’t like it because you didn’t get it" crap is really annoying. At any rate, attempting to use the story to justify the fact that they pretty much mailed it in for the last two-thirds of the game is weak and lazy and you should try to remove your mouth from Kojima’s cock if you actually buy into that shit. Besides, Splinter Cell’s gameplay is way better and doesn’t require me to sit through long-winded political conversations via codec (another cop out by the mgs2 team, jftr) just so I’ll know what the fuck is going on.
I will, however, at least agree wholeheartedly with you that the first MGS was a masterpiece. 😀
Yes. I agree, but at least when I really understand things or either I spit the game or love it.
At any rate, attempting to use the story to justify the fact that they pretty much mailed it in for the last two-thirds of the game is weak and lazy
Well no to me, If I can enjoy the game at least from a certain point, it’s fine by me & I always give more credit to the storyline rather than gameplay, but that’s just what I am.
you should try to remove your mouth from Kojima’s cock if you actually buy into that shit.
(don’t get ugly as in CC, I don’t wanna start a flame war so let’s try to keep this civil. Ok?).
You care about it? I buy into that shit, It’s impossible that I can suck Kojima’s cock because I hated many things about 3 & I hate other things about 2, So again. Do you actually care about it?.
Besides, Splinter Cell’s gameplay is way better and doesn’t require me to sit through long-winded political conversations via codec (another cop out by the mgs2 team, jftr) just so I’ll know what the fuck is going on.
I don’t give a damn about Splinter Cell I didn’t played it but that’s not the point here. We were talking about Metal Gear Solid 2 here & if you don’t like to sit through long-winded political conversations, why did you like MGS1 in the first place?
Too bad the ‘Syphon Filter’ games on the PS1 are still better than MGS series thus far.
Not to me, Syphon Filter is a badly designed shooter, hard & challeging as hell, but still it’s a very stupid game to me.
Fool needs to go back and work on ZOE again.
🙁
I want my ZOE3…
:seriously:
really, i had high hopes for this game but it failed so miserably.
its WAY too short! it makes mw2’s campaign look like a 100 hour game.
hell, the house of the dead is longer than this game. seriously.
They’re more fun.
Then if you add in the PSP games, well…fuck MGS.
I wasn’t calling you lazy. I was calling the dev’s lazy. The part where you’re on the ship was brilliant, but everything after wasn’t. They’re lazy for trying to justify the crap portions of the game with some hackneyed plot twist.
(don’t get ugly as in CC, I don’t wanna start a flame war so let’s try to keep this civil. Ok?).
Wasn’t flaming you.
You care about it?
:rolleyes:
I buy into that shit, It’s impossible that I can suck Kojima’s cock because I hated many things about 3 & I hate other things about 2
Gamers buying into shitty justifications for lazy, shitty games is what prompts dev’s to make more lazy, shitty games.
So again. Do you actually care about it?
Again. :rolleyes:
I don’t give a damn about Splinter Cell I didn’t played it but that’s not the point here. We were talking about Metal Gear Solid 2 here & if you don’t like to sit through long-winded political conversations, why did you like MGS1 in the first place?
Because MGS1’s gameplay was that good, for starters. The political shit was actually kind of interesting as well, considering that at least the basis of it was factual in nature. I was treated to (for the time) good cinematics while listening to it, too. They weren’t as long-winded as they were in MGS2, as well, and besides, exactly how many stealth-action games were out at the time that didn’t have shitty gameplay?
Also, frek Kojima and the Metal Gear series.
Fool needs to go back and work on ZOE again.
🙁
I want my ZOE3…
I’d love to see more ZoE. Didn’t Kojima retire or something, though, once he managed to flush the MGS series down the toilet?
No I think he ‘took a (mostly) hands off’ approach to the rest of the series.
And in a recent interview he said he was willing to make a ZOE3…which is what I’m hoping for.
I don’t know what’s shitty about MGS1 & 2 Gameplay.
Games of stealth action from that time.
1998:
Metal Gear Solid
Tenchu Stealth Assassins <- good game
Thief: The Dark Project <- Awful game to me.
2000: Hitman: Codename 47 <- I has some stealth features, but it’s a shooter to me.
2001: Metal Gear Solid 2 <- The best gameplay in all MGS series if you ask me, though I didn’t played 4 yet.
2002: Splinter Cell <- Didn’t played it, but from what I looked it’s like a fusion between Tenchu, MGS & Tomb Raider.
Nothing has ever really dissappointed me that badly so far.
And in a recent interview he said he was willing to make a ZOE3…which is what I’m hoping for.
Hm. Interesting. I’ll believe it when I see it, though.
I don’t know what’s shitty about MGS1 & 2 Gameplay.
I didn’t say MGS1’s gameplay was shitty. For that matter, MGS2’s gameplay wasn’t bad by any stretch. It was just a complete rehash of 1, as I’ve been saying.
Games of stealth action from that time.
Note to self: stop using rhetorical questions. :rolleyes:
Not getting involved, but I just want to say that any credibility you had disappeared right here.
May I know why?
Note to self: stop using rhetorical questions.
LOL
You realize you’re laughing at yourself, right?
Yes…
I wasn’t waiting for a MMO…
I’m happy I wasn’t one who bought it.
Speaking of which, I have to say although it wasn’t the most disappointing game I’ve played, World of Warcraft was actually a let-down for me. It just didn’t excite me when I finally decided to bite the bullet and give it a go. So I let my account lapse after the free trial ended, and I haven’t gone back to it. And this game has over 9 million active players? Why??
Speaking of which, I have to say although it wasn’t the most disappointing game I’ve played, World of Warcraft was actually a let-down for me. It just didn’t excite me when I finally decided to bite the bullet and give it a go. So I let my account lapse after the free trial ended, and I haven’t gone back to it. And this game has over 9 million active players? Why??
WoW has such a huge following because it’s Blizzard. Diablo 2, Starcraft, Warcraft….a lot of those players jumped into WoW without question, and now it’s all about the stats and gear and end raiding, so they always keep playing to get the best gear/numbers.. It’s really just gotten too boring to me, I finally quit after about 3 years of playing.
However, FFXI I will never play because of what I’ve heard (this is in the ‘is it worth it’ thread) of being so hard to solo outside of like…level 5. You basically have to party up to get anywhere in the game, and I always like WoW because you could solo all the way to the top. I only raided when I hit 80, never before. I loved that game, but like I said, it just got watered down too much for me.
However, FFXI I will never play because of what I’ve heard (this is in the ‘is it worth it’ thread) of being so hard to solo outside of like…level 5. You basically have to party up to get anywhere in the game, and I always like WoW because you could solo all the way to the top. I only raided when I hit 80, never before. I loved that game, but like I said, it just got watered down too much for me.
WoW sure has its awesome moments when you’ve just epically pwned the Dead Mines and left nothing but a trail of total carnage in your wake 😉
ahahaha, I only played as Horde, and I loved running my way to the Deadmines. Good times! 😀
Then you haven’t read further posts in that thread. Square Enix has made updates to Final Fantasy XI Online where soloing has been made a lot easier. You could solo from level 1 to 75 if you so desire. There are areas of the game where you do need to be in a party with others to fight against certain leveled monsters/story missions/etc. Then there are the endgame events etc where you are usually in a full alliance of 18 players. However those are certain events only, not the standard setup for all battles in the game.
Actually I did read that, however, you used the word theoretically(sp) meaning that it’s still hard as fuck to solo grind to the top level. Even if it is a solo-capable game, there’s that aspect that I just don’t feel right with a Final Fantasy game being an MMO. Relying on others to complete your gaming experience is important, but I play Final Fantasy purely for storyline/some side quests purposes. Clearly XI isn’t for me since you’d have to depend on those other 17 people for ‘certain events’ (which mean storyline related?) so no thanks for a FF Online game.
Sadly that’s where SE is leaning, again, with XIV yea?
Sadly that’s where SE is leaning, again, with XIV yea?
When I said theoretically, I mean it is possible to level to 75 via soloing, however it would take some time. Being in a standard experience party (6 person party), does speed things up. The ‘Certain Events’ I was referring to are endgame things like Dynamis, Limbus, Sky etc. Mission battles can usually be done with 3-6 people, depending on their levels, jobs and equipment setup.
I know. But FF XII gameplay was as empty as most of the MMO.
FF XI was not disappointing for me because I knew it was a MMO before it was released.
i was having more fun balancing the controller than playing the game itself
made by bethesda
thought hey could be pretty sweet
i wish i could get that time back
Most crushingly (and the moment that made me literally destroy the cartridge) the heroine is a sacrifice to the Mana tree. A SACRIFICE. She is supposed to become the Mana tree when it is destroyed after the final battle because her family line comes from the Mana Goddess herself.
I cannot believe I risked my life to get this game on release day in the middle of a blizzard.
I HATE YOU SWORD OF MANA!
are you like those guys that RAGED when the DS port of chrono had a better translation?
My mother found it and asked me if I’d want it, I said absolutely not. 4 months later she gave it to me for my birthday because it was only $5. I couldn’t return it because it had been over 90 days plus she had long since lost the receipt.
Don’t know why, but the game was a 6.8/10 for me. Just felt too much like a chore rather than being fun. Obviously most people don’t feel this way, so don’t take my opinion on it.
😛
Don’t you mess with Bubsy, he will platformer you to death.
It wasn’t bad really, I just expected SOOOO much more from the next Red Alert game since Red Alert 2 is one of my all-time favorite games.
Hahahhaa, yea, I played Bubsy (SNES version) about a year ago after reviving my SNES console. It just wasn’t the same as when I was 6 hahahhaa.
:PModern Warfare 2
I remember watching the show Airwolf, and I loved it. Pity the game was crap.
Most crushingly (and the moment that made me literally destroy the cartridge) the heroine is a sacrifice to the Mana tree. A SACRIFICE. She is supposed to become the Mana tree when it is destroyed after the final battle because her family line comes from the Mana Goddess herself.
I cannot believe I risked my life to get this game on release day in the middle of a blizzard.
I HATE YOU SWORD OF MANA!
just because the translation is more accurate in the remake and therefore differs from your childhood memory doesnt make it a bad game.
Let me get this off my chest: The translation in Sword of Mana is not more accurate. It is a complete re-imagining of the plot. Granted, you may be right about some things specific to the game, so I’m not going to refute your hypothesis in regards to Julius’s origins. However, you are completely wrong about the ending sequence. At the end of FF Adventure, the Mana Tree is destroyed. You actually see it happen. The Heroine promptly has a talk with her mother revealing that her mother is in fact the Mana tree and the Heroine herself must become the Mana Tree as soon as her mother dies, which is pretty much right then. Then the credits roll, and the "THE END" sign after the credits has a young Mana tree clearly showing the result of the Heroine’s transformation.
In Sword of Mana, After the final battle, everybody you ever met in the game shows up and talks. Then the Heroine says she realizes she was a sacrifice to the mana tree all along, and turns into some red thing with wings and flies up into the mana tree to sacrifice herself.
Also, the magic system is different by incorporating the elemental spirits from Secret of Mana and Seiken Densetsu 3, and this is reflected in the story when both the Hero and Heroine work together to open up the temple to find the tree of mana by finding the Dark and Light spirits. In FF Adventure, Julius kidnaps the heroine and uses her to go up the falls leading to the Tree of mana, and the Hero follows.
the graphics in the sequences I have just described prove how wrong you are. This is not a question of translation accuracy, this is a question of plot re-imagining. And the answer is SWORD OF MANA CHANGED THE PLOT. Do not respond until you have played both games as much as I have.
are you like those guys that RAGED when the DS port of chrono had a better translation? Of course not. I know when something is better, and the CTDS translation is better without changing anything fundamental like Sword of Mana did. Besides, Chrono Trigger on DS is the same game as Chrono Trigger on SNES. Final Fantasy Adventure on GB is not the same game as Sword of Mana on GBA.
OK, I feel better now. Maybe I can give Sword of Mana a better chance now that I’ve got all that hatred out of my system. Regardless, I’m still right about everything in this post.
I played it for one day and nearly Died!!
the game was not hard, was not frustrating, but DAAAMN it was so boring.
i had to resort to action replay to be invincible and ace through the levels, that was the only way i actually had any sense of enjoyment with it. i did like all the background for the clone wars, though
Plus no Slave 1 Rogue Squadron shooting levels.
His name is Duo.
Star Wars: Battlefront – Renegade Squadron
Lego Indiana Jones 2: The Adventure Continues (PSP Version)
Grand Theft Auto: Vice City
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (Xbox Version)
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Resident Evil 4
J.R.R. Tolkein’s Lord of the Rings Vol 1
Star Wars Battlefront – Renegade Squadron
Reason: No Clone Wars in Galactic Conquest, Some of the planets like Utapau, The Death Star from BF2 wasn’t in the game, very short and easy campaign unlike the one in BF2. Elite Squadron is way better
Lego Indiana Jones 2
Reason: No Original Trilogy like the PC Version has just Crystal Skull, Repetitive Soundtrack "A Whirl Through Academe" from the Crystal Skull Soundtrack keeps playing throughout the game
Grand Theft Out:Vice City
Reason:$@%%& Controls, Bad Color and contrast, horrible camera angles unlike San Andreas which had better controls and graphics
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
Reason: You can only play through Aragorn’s Stroy. It would have been nice to play through Merry and Pippin or Frodo’s Story unlike Return of the King which allowed you to play as Wizard,king and Hobbit plus the game is wayyyyyyyyyy to short you can beat it in like an hour
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Reason: Most HP Fans are disappointed in this game because there isn’t free roaming around Hogwarts and the game leaves out the plot and game play unlike the first 3 Harry Potter games and the game has you fight creatures and looks for useless items that had "NO" freaking thing to the plot of the story
Resident Evil 4
Reason: It didn’t quite have that N64 feeling and the game wasn’t that scary unlike the playstation version of the first 3 games
The Lord of the Rings VOL 1 (SNES)
Reason: This game had you picking up gems in order to get into Moria. Now if you knew anything about Tolkein’s books or you seen the movie THATS NOT HOW THEY GOT INTO MORIA!! second only Aragorn and the Hobbits go into Moria the other 4 fellowship members stay at Rivendell very disappointing game I was expecting a good RPG LOTR game but NO! it sucked
’nuff said.
Shaq Fu
Rise of the Robots
Final Fantasy 7
The Sims 2
Rise of the Robots is the biggest POS I played on the SNES. That game developer hopefully is no longer in the business.
-So pretty much any GTA after Vice City felt re-done. Super glad Red Dead Redemption is out.
-Super Mario Sunshine
-All Sonic’s after the DC release.
-Guitar Hero Van Halen
-Legend of Mana for PS1 or any Mana that wasn’t part 1 (excluding the Japanese only sequels I never played).
VERRRRRY Dissapointed.
tenchu z (360) controls felt too complicated.
there’s others, just those are the ones that stand out the most.
tenchu z (360) controls felt too complicated.
there’s others, just those are the ones that stand out the most.
It sounds like you should avoid Tenchu in general.
Legend of Zelda Ocarina of time
Super Dragonball Z
The Fidgets
and Breath of fire Dragon Quarter
Sega didn’t make Alpha Protocol, they only distributed it. Obsidian Entertainment were the ones who made it. It was a ok game, and didn’t really deserve all the negative feedback reviewers gave it imo. Still, can’t please everybody.
Just when you think you’re going to have all the questions answered at the end of a game, you get dragged through a mirror and that’s how it ends. That’s what I get for trying out 3rd party games. (Coming from someone who thought Henry Hatsworth was actually a pretty badass game)
Meh… can’t please everybody.
I smell a troll.
I smell a fanboy.
I smell a rat. I smell a slew of them. Skittering around, the ceiling and the ground~
The Fiction And Poetry forum is few forums up Neg.
Fanboys (and girls).
Sure, it may have disappointed Final Fantasy diehards, but viewed objectively, it definitely deserves a metacritic score in the 80s.
Personally I believe Dragon Age deserves a score at least in the mid to high nineties, but my opinion doesn’t mean shit – collectivism is the most likely way to judge the quality of something.
While I may disagree with Aniki about Dragon Age: Origins, it’s his choice not to like it.
Regarding metacritic and such… Personally, I don’t care much for review sites/gaming magazines/etc when it comes to deciding whether to get a game or not. Rent the game first, then make your own opinion whether to buy it or not I say.
And 82 out of 100 critics gave positive reviews on Final Fantasy XIII, but I’m pretty sure there are people here in this forum that will agree with me that it doesn’t deserve such high score.
82 out of 100. That is too high. How about -82 out of 100? I’m not trying to be flippant etc… but I really do despise this game and I do have my reasons for that as well.
Exactly the point i’m trying to make.
For instance, I’m with Olde when it comes to GTA4 – it was a game that I just couldn’t get into. Objectively though, I recognise it deserves the high review scores; what it does it does extremely, extremely well.
I’m not saying that review scores or reviewers are always right -metacritic is good in that it provides the average of a wide range of reviews. When it comes to gaming reviews, even though peoples tastes might vary on niche games, it’s hard to deny that any game that has a metacritic score of 85+ is a game that will be enjoyed by the majority of people who play it.
My thoughts are exact on Dragon’s Age.
That’s true, but remember… what may be considered a good or bad game is purely up to the individual in question. What one considers to be bad, may be considered good by another.
Exactly the point i’m trying to make.
For instance, I’m with Olde when it comes to GTA4 – it was a game that I just couldn’t get into. Objectively though, I recognise it deserves the high review scores; what it does it does extremely, extremely well.
I agree with both you and Olde about GTAIV. The main character was about as charismatic as a doormat for one thing. The only part of GTAIV I liked, were the two expansions (The Lost and Damned and The Ballad of Gay Tony) as I could enjoy them more than the original.
I’m not saying that review scores or reviewers are always right -metacritic is good in that it provides the average of a wide range of reviews. When it comes to gaming reviews, even though peoples tastes might vary on niche games, it’s hard to deny that any game that has a metacritic score of 85+ is a game that will be enjoyed by the majority of people who play it.
That’s purely subjective though… For example, Metacritic gave a review of 44 out of 100 for Warriors Orochi 2. Personally, I enjoyed it as a sequel to it’s predecessor, but others didn’t. You can’t please everyone.
My thoughts are exact on Dragon’s Age.
That’s your choice. I enjoyed Dragon Age and have played it more than once. If you don’t like it, while I may not agree with your decision, that’s your choice. I’m not gonna list reasons why you should like it. That’d just be a waste of time imo.
I was just called a name on another forum by a fanboy.A mod intervened.
If I am lucky they’ll give the guy an infraction.
I hate fanboys btw…smiles.
Well there are obvious bad games..like the ones the angry video game nerd talks about.
A lot of those are on the old systems.
A lot of the games that come out nowadays have flaws.But people disagree on whether those flaws are critical.Whether they matter.
FFXII has some terrible flaws.I believe and I don’t like the game..but a lot of others like it.
I haven’t played FFXIII yet.I hope to in the next few months. A lot of people feel it’s flawed as well…But a lot of people like it.
On some forums people have gotten into vicious flamewars over games..whether a game is good or bad. I was in one of those on gamefaqs.It got so bad I ended up quitting gamefaqs.
Since then I don’t even try to say whether a game is good or bad..just whether it is flawed and I point out what I feel are the flaws.
Shrugs..doesn’t stop you from being called a name though…
For me an rpg such as FF needs compelling characters, a cohesive and interesting plot, towns and minigames and all the traditional FF elements, and the music and so on and so forth.I am a traditionalist. If it violates tradition I don’t like it.
Just my 2 cents.
‘You should go play the older, 2D games’.
Now that that’s out of the way…
I’d say…no.
It’s nice to look at, but it takes too damn long to get enjoyable.
You’re better off playing ‘Lost Odyssey’ or something.
i cried, i really did.
For me an rpg such as FF needs compelling characters, a cohesive and interesting plot, towns and minigames and all the traditional FF elements, and the music and so on and so forth.I am a traditionalist. If it violates tradition I don’t like it.
So you dislike XII because it feels like a completely different rpg that has nothing to do with FF, ergo breaks the tradition or you dislike it for this and other reasons. Just asking…
FF13 is a good game in and of itself, but it’s not representative of ‘Final Fantasy’ as such, which is why it has its fair share of haters. Final Fantasy 12 was also different in that it tried to marry an MMO-style of combat with a single player game.
If you ask a person what defines ‘Final Fantasy’, you get wildly different answers because a lot of them are really wildly different games. For those that have been playing since Final Fantasy I on the NES, Final Fantasy is the quintessential JRPG – a menu-driven grind-a-thon (which admittedly has its charms). This battle system hasn’t really changed much (until FF11 and onwards, that is), just been tweaked slightly.
For those who started with Final Fantasy on the SNES, the games are about epic, sweeping storylines involving brooding anti-heroes and beautiful heroines.
Those who started with Final Fantasy on the PS1 (my group) see Final Fantasy as games about breaking technical barriers, and presenting a good story with AMAZING CGI.
I honestly don’t know what people who start with Final Fantasy XIII will think, because it’s too early to tell – but Final Fantasy is about many different things to many different people. Some games in the series do some things well, some do others well.
To be honest, some of the older games would be worthwhile playing, albeit on a smaller scale – if you have a PSP or iPhone, it’s worth checking out the remakes of Final Fantasy I & II. Or, if you have a DS/GBA, Final Fantasies III-IV are available in various forms, and are all still playable…kind of. I don’t like FF3, but that’s just me.
as others have noted.
It’s also incomplete, poorly edited, and needed some additional elements added, that I believe Matsuno would have added and corrected if he hadn’t left precipitously.
FFXIII from what I have heard seems to suffer from some but not all of the same deficiencies. I haven’t played it yet but I hope to by the end of the year.
Pretty graphics while good cannot take the place of compellling characters and a superb plot.
And what about gameplay.If it so much rote boring repetition then how can it hold anyone’s interest ?
Anyway , I hope Verses turns things around for FF.
I started with FF V and VI on the SNES btw…
Also, repetition can be a VERY powerful gameplay motivator; look at Halo, for instance, a game that has been described by its creators as ‘Five seconds of fun repeated ad infinitum’.
please don’t tell me this means what I think it means
Disc 2 Persistence I belive
But for me it would probably be Dragons Revenge for Genenisis/Megadrive
I acutally like the game, but when I was a younger I just picked the game because the anme sounded cool and the cover looked like it was full of medevial sword wielding dragon slaying kick ass sidescrolling beat’em up action.
Turns out it was a pinball game.
all i can say is: all the wrong ways to copy pokemon
The sad thing is… George Lucas has made both TFU games, canon with the movies…
people thought they werent canon?
if its an original game, no matter how shitty it is (bounty hunter) then its canon – george lucas.
🙁
Without a doubt the "game" of love…….
🙁
Going into that game with high expectations was a pretty dumb thing to do, man.
I went in it with fairly average "expectations" but it STILL managed to let me down.
instead, that disappointment has manifested in a game called Tales of Vesperia. Let me tell you something, the plot stopped making sense halfway in, it got pretty disgustingly jrpgish at the worst times, the anime cutscenes had crappy animation, the only cool chars were Yuri/Flynn and Raven and even then like Tales sucks at humor so they weren’t even that good overall. So much for me to nitpick x_X the battle system felt pretty stale overall, i honestly didn’t think it was that fun esp since bosses were cheap and broke out of combos ridiculously easily (unless i’ve been doing something wrong, likely but it was annoying). at least it had difficulty…… but no, i went in with pretty high expectations and came out with… burnout. thank god the ps3 port isn’t coming to the west.
i guess the worst part is that i even prepared for the worst. my gameplay expectations were pretty high and i got something that, despite being an abyss upgrade… wasn’t at all stellar and got pretty boring quickly unlike Abyss, and it actually managed to go way WAY below my plot expectations. I mean at least i had really little hope for Symph II to begin with, I had some hope of "oh its just subjective"………….. god, vesperia, god. wasting such a cool name on a disappointing game. FOR SHAME. FOR SHAAAAME.
Before playing Cross I read up on it about it being "hit or miss" and I had a feel that my reaction would be "eh." I hated the gameplay, the plot was something I read up on due to genuine interest and I actually kinda liked it (despite it nullifying Chrono Trigger and making them seem like pawns or bastards depending on your interpretation, bleh) and the music was gorgeous. Except I only got to the Serge/Lynx body switch before i stopped giving a crap and then hard drive failure and yeah i’ll just read TheDarkId’s LP on it if i care enough for plot. I guess it all averaged out to "better than eh," but the gameplay disappointed me greatly.
surprisingly, almost every other game i have played wasn’t disappointing to me at all ^_^ I tend to have a good feeling towards whatever i end up buying and that guides me in the right direction. Its just that the Tales games are quite strange in this regard.
Serious? Are you just shoveling your money into every "party game" available?
My most disappointing game is probably Halo 3. I absolutely adore Halo 1, and its still one of my favourite games ever. Halo 2 was a bit wobbly at times, but it got better as it went on. I consider it a very worthy sequel to a game that was always going to be a challenge to top. A lot of key staff members had left between Halo 1 and Halo 2 as well, so that probably didn’t help.
But Halo 3… man, that game was so boring and unambitious. They had all that extra firepower on the 360 to work with, and yet it all felt so routine and utterly uninspired, like Bungie just wanted the series to be over. It just felt like there had been no genuine enthusiasm by the developers when making this game. Dull set pieces, much reused situations, no real advance in gameplay terms, and a vastly scaled down and poorly executed plot.
I haven’t played a new Halo game since then, because that game really sounded the death knell for that series, as far as I was concerned. If Mass Effect 3 with its dubious Kinect controls can just avoid being anywhere near as drab and by the numbers as Halo 3, I think Bioware can call it a win.
Halo 3 – made me sick and tired of the whole series
Call of Duty – Modern Warfare 2
Medal of Honor 2010 – campaign had some good moments/levels and bad ones, multiplayer was too frustrating to be fun
Homefront
The whole Kinect addon for Mass Effect 3 is a joke imo, a poor marketing ploy to try and appeal to those with the delusion of more interactivity with Shepard and co. Just means instead of selecting your dialogue choices or directing your squad to different locations during battle by controller, you speak the dialogue choice you want or direct your squad verbally (IE Garrus, move forward. Garrus, Concussive shot etc etc etc). Fortunately it’s optional to use Kinect, so you can select from the menu whether to use it or not. I’m assuming that last part, but from what I’ve read on the Mass Effect wiki and on other forums (BioWare’s own forums for one), that not using the Kinect won’t change anything else of the game, which is good… as I refuse to pay money for that gimick solely for one game. If I did that, I’d have bought a Wii for Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn.
Basically, I’m just saying that whilst I rolled my eyes as I imagine most people did, when hearing of Kinect in ME3, my primary concern for that game is that it doesn’t go down the terrible path that Halo 3 did, and make sure the series goes out with a bang, not a whimper.
A flat, uninspired, ‘we’re doing it for the money now’ ME3, would be a heartbreaking calamity.
Clumsy made-up story, shorter than other SHs, unoriginal mechanics (going through mirrors… bah!), rehashed locations and ridiculous support characters. Only good (good, not great) thing is the soundtrack, although less brilliant than other SHs’ OSTs.
resident evil, bad? ARE YOU FUCKING RETARDED?
who in their right mind would spend 30 dlls on a PORT when you can get the same game used for 10 or less?.
thinking better, you DESERVE to be dissapointed, but for yourself for falling into such a stupid scam.
resident evil, dissapointing?
WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU.
i expected something like the first one, or better.
its not like the first one, and its not better.
however, it is NOT a bad game.
Probably FF10, because I do think the other 2 are fairly good games, they just aren’t as good as I was hoping for, and/or weren’t what I wanted them to be. But FF 10 was just utterly terrible – and crucially for this thread – a massive letdown.
Also, I really need to get around to trying out Parasite Eve; I’ve never even played the first one :O
But with Majora’s Mask… I mean, maybe people don’t understand now, but back then, this was like *the* game that people were waiting for. Ocarina of Time was so amazing, that a new Zelda game was cause for truly irrational excitement.
So on release day, I’m all set to go and grab my copy, but because of a series of mishaps, I only got down the town, late in the afternoon. I raced back home, put it in… and the damn thing didn’t work, because I didn’t have the N64 memory expansion thing that you needed to have!
Looking up at the clock, I saw I had about 15 minutes to get back into town, before they closed up for the day. And I tell you, the Flash had nothing on me, that day. I *flew* out of my house, sprinted like my life depended on it, and basically slithered under the door as they were bringing the grill at the shop down! I managed to persuade them to serve me, got my upgrade, and left an exhausted but happy man.
Which meant that I finally played the game… and it was only okay.
Wow, I had an epiphany mid-post. Kudos to me.
But still… it felt really short, and very much like a spin-off, when I was expecting a full, proper Zelda game. And I’ll admit, my expectations after Ocarina were never going to be met, because that really was a classic of all time IMO.
Your point about it feeling like a survival horror at times is a good one, and that’s kind of the problem I had with RE4 (but the other way, obviously). RE4 is a good action game and its really enjoyable in a cheesy James Bond kind of way, with awful quips from the hero, daft OTT set pieces and gloating villains shouting ‘MATALO!’, but that’s not what I thought I was getting at all, when I paid my money!
If they’d made it a new game, rather than turning RE into this farce, then I would have been fine with it.
the main theme in here is death.
the 3 characters you transform to? they all died.
the entirety of termina? dead in 3 days.
you even visit a dead kingdom!
the girls father in ikana would probably had killed the girl and sucumb to the curse.
death (or any variance of the word) is the most spoken word of the game.
hell, even oot didnt have much death in it.
ganon didnt want to kill everybody, he wanted to RULE everybody.
then theres the shadow temple. and the only ("important") character deaths were ganondorfs nannies. not even ganon himself died.
majora on the other hand, said FUCK IT, IF IM TO BE ALONE, THEN ILL MAKE SURE THERES NO ONE ALIVE.
What does it being dark have to do with anything? I don’t disagree on that point (and I did mention that the game is eerie at times and CC pointed out it feels like survival horror etc), but I don’t see how that’s relevant to what we’re discussing here. Big, open, epic, adventurous – these are words I would hope to use when describing a Zelda game. Darkness is something I can take or leave in these games (and OoT did have such moments, like the first time you enter the Market and its destroyed, with all those screaming zombie things around).
The start and ending of Majora’s Mask are genuinely interesting, but the bulk of the game felt very lightweight to me. Though neat at first, the time travel starts to feel gimmicky, an excuse to reuse the same locations and situations over and over, and as I said the whole game feels really short. Its not like I didn’t enjoy playing it, but it wasn’t anywhere near the awesome experience that OoT was (I could have lived without that thrice-damned Water Temple though…) It was just a combination of expectations that were far too high, and the fact that after something as top class as OoT, the only way is down, even if only by a little.
But you don’t want to admit that at the time, you want to believe that the next one is going to be just as good, if not better. And IMO, Majora’s Mask wasn’t as good, and that was a crushing experience, because I’d been looking forward to it ever since I finished OoT.
majoras mask, for its mere core content, should be rated AO.
and a matter of fact, i wasnt hyped when oot came out. i was kinda dissapointed because the previous versions were more open (example, market town being an actual town and just screens).
obtain the triforce
And yeah, I know that Nintendo do dark a lot more (and much better) than people think. The Wii actually has quite a lot of survival horror games, even though you wouldn’t generally think that would be the case. Which would be great, except for the fact that most of them are rubbish!
ridiculous 10 minute story lines and a very small character selection.
majoras mask, for its mere core content, should be rated AO.
and a matter of fact, i wasnt hyped when oot came out. i was kinda dissapointed because the previous versions were more open (example, market town being an actual town and just screens).
obtain the triforce
Dark = good? It being dark and full of death doesn’t make it a good game.
I mean, I thought MM was a good game actually, but that’s besides the point.
1 Resident evil 5:I expected more from it because i had played the previous games,and even if i wasn’t the worlds biggest resident evil fan,i still relatively enjoyed the scares.It wasn’t scary at all much to say,and it rips off the matrix with those bullet time effects that wesker performs.
2:Final fantas 7:Talk about games that have a huge let down with the hype it came with.This game was a monumental let down for me coming from ff6.I expected more from the characters to be likeable and the story to be intriguing,instead i forgot many instances and found the villain to be shallow and pathetic.I used to love final fantasy,but i stopped caring much for the series after X.I don’t even have a wish to finish 8 or X,and i own both of them.
3:Suikoden 4:Its world is closed off and everything is squeezed in as tight as possible.I was running around and getting characters much more easily than in the previous game,plus the wars were nowhere near as fun.
4:Metal gear solid 4:I loved the series of metal gear solid.I played all the previous games and enjoyed them more and more.The first one i loved the mixture of real footage that was placed within the game of vietnam or of president kenedy and such.I really enjoyed and was intrigued with the story like no other game in that time,and this was special for that reason.Then came metal gear solid 2 which upgraded many things the first didn’t have.I enjoyed being able to put enemies inside a locker and even hide within lockers and bang and confuse the guards.I loved the reaction of guards looking at adult magazines or lockers.The reaction of the guards when they see raiden naked is really funny.Then came metal gear solid 3,a game that broke the boundaries that i have never seen before,a game that got even better than the first 2 and left me gasping at how amazing the game overall was.The story and characters were just amazing.I loved the gameplay because it actually forced you to think before rushing in and not go in guns blazing shooting everything.To me,metal gear solid wasn’t about going around shooting anything that moves,to me it was about being careful to the max and disabling security cameras and blowing up electrical floors,to me it was an action shooter which wasn’t just about going around killing people.After mgs4,i was hyped up to death about the series because after 3,i couldn’t wait to see what came next,then i found 4 which left me less than satisfied.Mgs4 was for me,a let down.I was hoping for so more,and yet,it seemed to go backwards rather than progress gaming.The gameplay was a step back,because you could go around shooting people.It was a major letdown because you had rations rather than looking for food to eat.I miss being able to interact with the surroundings and throw snakes at enemies to distract them,or cure your wounds.It felt kinda realistic in that way,because a soldier of that kind would have some knowledge of medical assistance.Maybe not an absolute expert,but some expertise in order to survive.
Zelda twilight princess:This game bored me.I tried,but i couldn’t keep myself interested.I used to love zelda series.When you got the horse,it was not exciting like the previous games.I didn’t have that much desire to explore the world that much either.It just felt like i really didn’t care all that much.
Mgs4:I was expecting a little more,because i love the series,but i was a bit disappointed in the gameplay and story department.
Suikoden 4:I really liked the series,but this game was not on par with the rest.
If Charmo was referring to Actraiser II, that I can understand… but not the first one…
-Suikoden 4:I really liked the series,but this game was not on par with the rest.
Everyone knows that Suikoden IV and Rhapsodia (Suikoden Tactics) are the worst in the Suiko series.
Except for the people who actually like suikoden 4,or maybe they are trolling,i dunno.
Some people claim it to be a good game,i even saw one guy in a youtube comment call it the best suikoden.
Don’t ask,i don’t know what he was smoking,cause:
The battle system sucks in comparison to suikoden 2 and 5.
The characters are all crammed in to towns,and there are only a hand full of actual towns.
The main hero wears short shorts,and for some reason is a boy.He looks like a girl.
The characters weren’t really memorable,and i didn’t even like the main hero’s friend.
i liked it for that,. reminded me of another series i like a lot: clock tower.
The first Crash game after Naughty Dog discontinued the series. I think it was made to compete with [I]Sonic Shuffle[I] and [I]Mario Party 2[I], which those two games I don’t know much about.
It had some very frustrating levels, like the tank levels and the "Crashball" (can’t describe the type of) levels. They were terribly frustrating. The next game in the series is a little bit better, though.
———- Post added at 12:15 PM ———- Previous post was at 12:13 PM ———-
Oh and as someones’ reminded me, Crash Bash for PS1 was awful 🙁
To just a small extent, the PS2 version of Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory.
Can’t really think of many disappointing games, some have worn me out, else I’ve kept nearly every single game I’ve happened to own.
I’m not saying the game is a masterpiece by any means, but that aspect of it was pretty impressive.
What about the remake of alone in the dark?
I saw a review of it by spoony,and he was talking about having to attack different patches on the bodies of enemies,and the supposed broken controls of the car.Like:Supposedly,the car would fly backwards if it crashes into a sidewalk,or a tree.
To be disappointed, you have to have had some expectation and/or hope that the game would be good. The Alone in the Dark remake was always going to be awful. There hasn’t been a truly decent installment of that series for decades. The New Nightmare for example on the PS2 was pretty dire, but it had its moments, I suppose. The remake/reboot/whatever you want to call it, from this gen though, looked terrible from the get go (and indeed it was appallingly bad).
Alan Wake meanwhile generated huge amounts of expectation in the survival horror community. It was billed as a highly ambitious Twin Peaks style open world kind of deal. Details were kept under wraps, but it sounded like the game we’d been waiting for. Because this gen has been terrible for survival horror, with Resident Evil continuing to abandon its horror roots, the Silent Hill games from this gen have all been crap (haven’t played the Wii ones though which are apparently better), and Fatal Frame hasn’t been good since Crimson Butterfly.
Alan Wake was hopefully going to turn that around, but instead it was a pretentious, boringly repetitive action game with a terrible main character, weak dialogue and plot, and absolutely none of the ambition or open world it had teased earlier in its development. The real kicker was that Deadly Premonition came out around the same time and was all the things that Alan Wake had promised!
Deadly Premonition was one of those golden games, which just seemed to fall out of the sky unannounced, and was so amazing that its in my Top 5 games of this gen. It has its problems (graphics are awful, action sequences are tacked on) but in all the important regards, its one of the best games I’ve played in years and years and years.
Which just made Alan Wake seem all the more awful. If it didn’t have the ‘Child of the Elder God’ rock concert shootout, that game would have been without any merits.
To be disappointed, you have to have had some expectation and/or hope that the game would be good. The Alone in the Dark remake was always going to be awful. There hasn’t been a truly decent installment of that series for decades. The New Nightmare for example on the PS2 was pretty dire, but it had its moments, I suppose. The remake/reboot/whatever you want to call it, from this gen though, looked terrible from the get go (and indeed it was appallingly bad).
Alan Wake meanwhile generated huge amounts of expectation in the survival horror community. It was billed as a highly ambitious Twin Peaks style open world kind of deal. Details were kept under wraps, but it sounded like the game we’d been waiting for. Because this gen has been terrible for survival horror, with Resident Evil continuing to abandon its horror roots, the Silent Hill games from this gen have all been crap (haven’t played the Wii ones though which are apparently better), and Fatal Frame hasn’t been good since Crimson Butterfly.
I also heard that the alone in the dark movie sucks.Any confirmation on this?
Also:i could have sworn i played alan wake game demo.
Anything directed by Uwe Boll sucks.
in other words, the least shitty of his movies
‘Raging Boll’ – lol!
The first metal gear to betray me:Metal gear solid 4.
First suikoden to betray me:Suikoden 4
First zelda game to disappoint me:Twilight princess:I found the world to seem smaller and the horse was basically:A hand me down.
First metroid to kind of disappoint:Metroid prime 2 echoes.The world didn’t seem like it was that different all together.I finished it,but i still don’t like it as much as the first metroid prime.
I’m not sure if that is the same game,but i heard that in those games,they charge extra for outfits that should probably be included for the characters.I watched a review,and a guy called razorfist complained about the pheonix outfit.
Okay game, but it was kinda disappointing how it turned out. It had a really cool concept, but it wasn’t executed well, sadly.
There’s nothing new about the gameplay, the plot sucked till the second-ranked assassin appeared (after that there’s just one assassin left and the game ends).
No More Heroes (the first one) didn’t need all those minigames, clothes for Travis and that awful animated sequence about Pure White Lover Bizarre Jelly 5 to be a must play. To me Suda51 got lucky, his other projects are boring (Killer7, Lollipop Chainsaw are examples of that).
First metroid to kind of disappoint:Metroid prime 2 echoes.The world didn’t seem like it was that different all together.I finished it,but i still don’t like it as much as the first metroid prime.
I have to disagree. :p I actually like Prime 2 a little bit more than the first one. I like that it’s harder (to me it is) and I like the overall darker atmosphere of the game. I also think the music is better too. Especially the Temple Grounds music. Same reason I like Majora’s Mask more than Ocarina of Time.
I have to disagree. :p I actually like Prime 2 a little bit more than the first one. I like that it’s harder (to me it is) and I like the overall darker atmosphere of the game. I also think the music is better too. Especially the Temple Grounds music. Same reason I like Majora’s Mask more than Ocarina of Time.
The difficulty didn’t bother me, it was the dark world segment.To me, it seemed to rip off zelda.Zombie space marines? really? I never thought i’d see a zombie in a metroid game.Also:The portal thing cam from zelda.The artwork was great, and the weapons very different, but that portal thing bothered me.
I’m a big Bond fan but it was truly terrible 🙁
Such a shame.
Pokemon Mystery Dungeon Explorers all three versions (why do I have to pay that Chatot again?)
Here’s to hoping the 3DS remake of DQM makes it stateside.
I won that game in a raffle, and I hadn’t won anything in a while so I got really excited, but boy does that game blow.
gravity rush (psvita). The game mechanics itself aren’t that bad, but the story and setting were both disappointing.
gi joe rise of cobra (wii). I have no idea why I even bothered to play this shit, I guess I thought it would be like the movie.
thrillville (psp) bad ripoff of rollercoaster tycoon
sims 2 pets (psp/wii) just bad.
legend of zelda: spirit tracks (nds) first time playing a zelda game, and what do you have to do? guide a fucking train through the field. boring as shit.
grey’s anatomy (nds). I’m ashamed to say I’ve played this but what can I say? I like the tv show, I didn’t know that this game would be a bitter disappointment.
max payne 3 (pc) Everything was great except that the story is too short.
sims 3 (any other platform than pc). PC version is just better in all aspecsts. nuff said
uncharted 3: drake’s deception (ps3) only the desert level because it’s 30 minutes of absolutely nothing, just wandering around in the desert, boring ass shit
sim city societies (pc). what people thought would be a great spin-off/follow-up game to sim city 4 was actually a childish shit version in 3d of the game.
kingdom hearts re:coded (nds). i didn’t like the story
lost horizon (PC). I accidentally bought this thinking it was a 3D action/adventure game like indiana jones or tomb raider. turns it it’s more of a hidden object/puzzle kind of game. not bad though, I played it all the way through. but not what I thought it was.
lara croft: guardians of light (PC). not what I thought it would be. disappointing.
Should’ve started with the first one and work your way up. :p
Tomb Raider: Angel of Darkness
FFX-2
Now that I think of it, the only game I’ve really been disappointed with was Crysis – not that I expected anything great or even decent of it, it just turned out to be even greater disappointment than I thought it would.
I just couldn’t get into it and the ending left me more empty than satisfied plus Burial at Sea just compounded my anger.
It was a real cop out for me and utterly loved the first two.
Other than those… I’d really hoped to like Red Dead Redemption, because I’ve wanted a good Western video game since forever. But I’m really not a fan of Rockstar’s writing, and the whole anti-hero thing never does much for me. I wanted to be more of a Marshal Dillon type, keeping his town safe from desperados and crooked land barons etc.
ONE: some people have posted responses which fit the title, so I’ll allow it.
TWO: My opinion, Dragon Age Inquisition. Huge disappointment all around.
Transformers: Cybertron Adventures for Wii
A while back, i saw this game at Rogers, the name sounded and looked cool so I rented it, but when I actually played the game, it sucked. You follow a single path and the character you control moves on his own and will only move after you kill every enemy an area, the music and controls also sucked, the graphics were really bad as well. In the end, I just gave it back because it was this bad. I would rather play War for Cybertron and Fall of Cybertron on XBox 360/PS3 and PC instead of this shitty game for the Wii. This game isn’t worth buying or renting because it was awful in every single way.
Sonic and the Secret Ring
To start things off, the announcer was entertaining, every time you took out a Pok???mon with Seismic Toss, the announcer would yell: "HUUUUUURLED BY SEISMIC TOSS!". He was voiced by the same guy who narrated the Pok???mon anime.
The graphics were amazing, every move animation and models were simply incredible, although i don’t like Poliwrath’s model since it doesn’t even face it’s opponent for some reason lol.
And last but certainly not least, the game had an amazing soundtrack composed by Tsukasa Tawada, who coincidentally also composed the music for Pok???mon Colosseum and Pok???mon XD: Gale of Darkness.
But, to pick one…
Probably Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories.
Donkey Kong 64. I was (and still am) a big fan of the SNES titles and therefore was super excited for DK64, but it turned out to be everything the old games were not. No lighthearted fast paced gameplay, instead you were constantly collecting far too many different items and backtracking because you were forced to change characters.
Oh and there’s lots of bugs, which I guess is the norm for Bethesda games.
I played Half Life 2 right after completing Halo 3 and wow what a game. My disappointment towards Halo 3 grew even more after Half Life 2.
5 minutes in and no interest whatsoever.
the hype and generation of hype is the only appeal to it.
Everything is a cinematic and for a large portion of the game when you start, you have zero control.
So when you get an achievement out on the field, it stops you, you lose control, and a wild animal attacks you.
You’re nearly dead before they let you play again. By that point, it’s useless to do anything.
You’ll die if you move then have to spend an hour going through the screensaver mode of the game.
Everything about the first play should easily be skipped.
It’s only meant for showcasing at the E3 show.
There’s way too many icons on the screen with no exposition so there’s nothing to care about.
Half the stuff you can’t interact with, just shoot them and get basic carbon.
For something that’s been held off too long, it’s quite a useless game.
It’s also severely insulting there’s no "screensaver" mode where gameplay is auotmatic.
I’d love a game that’s a screensaver.
Like the "Mountain" game.
Ugliest game ever created, completely different from the fake trailers.
1 – THE DOWNRIGHT GENOCIDAL POLICE; coming from GTA IV’s bumbling fat cops to these killing machines should have been criminalized!
2 – AI Drivers; "Oh no, a noise! I’d better become an unstoppable vehicular force to kill everything in my way!"
3 – The Rock Station; "You wanted Danger Zone? Sorry, here’s back-to-back [glitch if I ever met one] airings of Roundabout!"
4 – Lamar Davis, aka the Single Most Annoying GTA Character I’ve had the misfortune of dealing with. Even Ryder & Big Smoke weren’t this atrociously bad!
5 – The Glitches in Online; "No, I don’t want another car or shark-card, I want a playable game for just a few hours at least!"
@ pufffdragon: I’m not trying to start an argument here, but what exactly is it about Halo 3 that was such a letdown in your opinion? The story? The music? The graphics?
1) One of the first games I bought with my own earned money and not an allowance.
2) First FF I hadn’t emulated. Felt happy finally giving back to Square-Enix for one of my favorite series.
3) What the **** is this damn game.
4) Wait no, it’s over? You’ve got to be kidding me.
Anyways, I will spare you the specifics and save them for a FFXIII discussion thread, but I cannot remember a bigger disappointment with a game than that one. And beyond it, I’m not a fan of what SE has been doing with the series since either. Nowadays I usually just exclude or plain forget mentioning FF among my favorites and skip the trouble of explaining.
Now I’m not sure which I find worse, FF or Megaman. And the latter even gave me my nickname, so darn.
My most disappointing games, well from the FF series it would be XII. I just didn’t give a crap about the characters and it was just too much of a ripoff from Star Wars. Plus I didn’t like the character’s hair graphics either, not just the styles, but it wasn’t moving right.
Other than that, I’m not sure…oh the House of 1000 Doors hidden object game series was good, until game 3 when they messed with the storyline a little, and game 4 was pathetic.
The first couple Haunted Hotel HOA games weren’t that great either, first one had the storyline as text based, and it was too long and drawn out.
Dark Parables was a good HOA series until Blue Tea Games quit doing it after game 7 and Eipix took over…the later games, I get the "Storyline, what storyline?" impression…even if you take it as a standalone game, they don’t really try to have it make sense.
(I have no idea how that would even work though.)
However, the wonky camera was so bad that I couldn’t play the game longer than 15 minutes.
It’s like listening to a band who’s had a key member leave to start a solo career, when you loved their music up to that point. Let’s say…Aerosmith after Joe Perry left in the late 70’s. That shouldn’t be too polarizing.
Which one?
Here we have a video-oriented gaming module with Roman numerals in its title, yet when I began my adventure, damned if I didn’t notice our setting wasn’t Rome. I mean, what kind of false advertising is this?! I fire up this video-gaming thingie, and instead of being treated to epic clashes amongst Roman soldiers in the good old days of warfare and violence, instead it’s just some made-up world with airboats and giant turtles. Dafuq is this, bro?! Hopefully this company, Squaresoft, sees the error in their ways and ceases this reprehensible campaign of spreading falsehoods. You put Roman numerals in your game title, then I better be taken to a digital Roman landscape fighting to preserve the mighty Roman Empire. For shame, Squaresoft. For shame.