Lakeshore Records
"Patriots Day"
Trent Reznor



This share with ad's. Wait 5 second! Click "Continue"! Close all pop-ups ! And all time press only "Continue", until you get link for download!
If you can not download, please, write to me only in PM. I will answer, when i can. And I'll just give you a direct link to file.

(http://linkshrink.net/7QP8ix) (http://linkshrink.net/7rCrPL) (http://ul.to/f/dj8v9i)

This release got other versions of the tracks, in contrast to the FYC !

For Your Golden Globe Consideration (Thread 213151)
Deluxe Edition (Thread 213863)

Tracklist:


01:08:39

01. Them and Us [04:18]
02. We Forget Who We Are [04:55]
03. The Place You Are Right Now [07:06]
04. Inquiries [04:38]
05. Trails [05:53]
06. Broken Glass [05:05]
07. Nobody Cares About Me [04:12]
08. The Night Drive [12:14]
09. Escape [06:34]
10. Terminus [02:54]
11. Long Shadows on the Street [07:10]
12. Resolve [03:34]



- - - - - - - - MY SHARE OF NEW RELEASES OF THE WEEK - - - - - - - -

(Thread 213808) (http://ul.to/f/zuycqe) (http://ul.to/f/ud1axr) (http://ul.to/f/l5bm5k) (Thread 213957) (Thread 213869)
(Thread 213862) (Thread 213863) (Thread 213864) (Thread 213865) (Thread 213867) (Thread 213868)
(Thread 213836) (Thread 213788) (Thread 213892) (Thread 213941) (Thread 213958) (Thread 213959)

Thanks!

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thanks!!!

Thank You!

Thank you very much!!! :)

Thank you Bart !! :D You the man !!

Great!! Thank you very much!!

thank you

thanks again

Is this a different mix or content compared to the FYC?

Thanks.

The FYC is longer

lossless added

33rd track "End Crawl", not on the disc.

Is that missing cue from the FYC in this release (somewhat edited, maybe in the last cue "Resolve")?
Thanks anyway for the share ;)

Thank you for sharing.

Thanks!

Thanks, Bart Oss!

Thanks.

Guys, you look only at the titles and duration. It is not right...

OST - 01. Them and Us = FYC 32. Main Titles (cut version)
OST - 02. We Forget Who We Are = FYC 31. Interviews (alternate version)
OST - 03. The Place You Are Right Now = FYC end of track - 16. Backpack & Brothers to M.I.T. (alternate version) - rest not exist in fyc
OST - 04. Inquiries = FYC 05. Arrival (alternate version)
OST - 05. Trails = FYC 08. FBI (cut version)
OST - 06. Broken Glass = FYC 06. Dread + 07. Bombs + 28. The Boat + 29. Swat (all alternate versions)
OST - 07. Nobody Cares About Me = FYC 18. Car Jack (same)
OST - 08. The Night Drive = FYC 19. Drive to Watertown (cut version)
OST - 09. Escape [06:34] = FYC 20. Escape (alternate version)
OST - 10. Terminus = FYC 22. Tamerlan (alternate version)
OST - 11. Long Shadows on the Street = FYC 02. Donuts & Legs + 14. Obama & Coffee + 27. Good versus evil (all alternate versions)
OST - 12. Resolve (cut version) = FYC 30. Capture & Fenway (cut version) - if you want, you can make a full version, of these two :D

Thanks.

Thank you.

Is this music available anywhere else? I'm not turning off ad-blocker just to download music.

thank you

Thank you Bart Oss for sharing this soundtrack!

Thanks for sharing.

thanks for the flac

thank you, Bart.

Thanks!!

Thank you

thanks

Many thanks

The FLAC is coming up as "upsampled" in my lossless audio checker. Seems the FLAC is just the MP3 version upsampled. I didn't notice a difference by ear either.

thanks <3

The FLAC is coming up as "upsampled" in my lossless audio checker. Seems the FLAC is just the MP3 version upsampled. I didn't notice a difference by ear either.

This is really funny, especially when most of people can't hear any difference between flac and mp3. Also this music, don't have a many high frequencies.

Thank you for sharing!

thanks !

Thanks Bart.

This is really funny, especially when most of people can't hear any difference between flac and mp3. Also this music, don't have a many high frequencies.

I guess I'm not "most people" then because I can hear differences between lossless music versus compressed music. It's not a magic trick. It's just picking up on what compression does to certain frequencies and what it does to spatial effects, elements of music that give the impression that it occupies space around you. I'm sure more people can hear it if they just knew what to look for and focus on. When it comes down to comparing, some factors matter. A) What music are they using to compare because lossless benefits different styles of music and different mixes/masters. B) What are they listening on when doing the comparison because not every player or headphone or speaker is the same. But most people don't put that much effort or care into their listening experience. It's just something to pass time and fill the silence.

There is most definitely a difference between FLAC and MP3 and elements of music have been proven to be altered and/or loss with compression. It's just up to you if you can hear it or not. Some can, some can't, some possibly are not sure what they're looking for. Perhaps it's not that big of a difference with loud, heavy rock music that is brickwalled, but this soundtrack is the exact type of music (atmospheric, ambient) that benefits from the lossless experience. I'm sure being a music producer has also helped train my ears over the years.

Also, if you are listening to it on your computer, you need to actually change your soundcard's output to the correct setting as well as making sure you're player can handle it or adjust a setting. On my computer, I use WinAmp, but had to activate the ability to handle 24 bit. I also had to go into my sound card setting and change the setting to handle up to and including 24/192. Certain cell phones, such as later models of Samsung Galaxy, can handled lossless and 24 bit audio. I have a Samsung Galaxy Note 4 for playing music while driving or walking, but had to pay $5 for a player that didn't downgrade the audio. I dropped around $150 for my Audio Technica ATH-M50X headphones, which are quite good. No, Beats headphones are not preferable. But the ATH's have great reviews. There's quite a few great and affordable headphones out there for experiencing lossless music and for music production. I play music through my computer, but I have my laptop hooked up to my Roland audio interface (which can handle 24/192) with my Tannoy Reveal 802s. They cost me around $500 for the pair. So no, you don't have to be rich to experience the enjoyment of lossless music... of course, having some extra dough wouldn't hurt if you really wanted to go all out and splurge. There's some stellar gear out there. But I wish people put as much effort into their music listening experience as they do with their TVs. We want 4K, they want the 70 inch TV, they want surround sound, they want subwoofers... yet we listen to music in lossy compression.

It's like saying most people can't tell the difference from DVD to Blu-ray when it comes to MP3 to FLAC. You are losing out on elements of music with MP3 compression. The industry just needs to stop cranking crap too loud and brickwalling their mixes. That and lossless music would greatly improve the listening experience. But just because some people can't hear the difference doesn't change that fact that there are people who can hear the difference. I mean here we are, you yourself are posting both MP3 and FLAC options for download. So obviously people on here are searching for lossless music. Having MP3 compression files labeled as FLAC out there is not going to help people who may stumble upon them trying to hear what's so great about lossless. Not blaming you, it's obviously whoever your source is. Plus I don't want to see anyone get screwed that may have paid for a lossless file to be cheated.

It doesn't change that whoever your source of this leak is tried to one up people by upsampling a compressed file to make it look like it's lossless. Either they wanted to be the cool guy that has the "lossless" leak by faking it or really thought you could change a lossy compressed file into lossless. The first sign was the small total file size difference from MP3 compared to FLAC. Then the actual files stayed around 400-500kbps when normally 16 bit FLAC rides around 800-900kbps while a 16 bit WAV is locked at 1411. That, along with my ears, and then my lossless audio checker to confirm my suspicions.

The FLAC is coming up as "upsampled" in my lossless audio checker. Seems the FLAC is just the MP3 version upsampled. I didn't notice a difference by ear either.

You asserted this incorrectly in the thread for The Social Network, as well. Perhaps you should check your software? Also, a high bit rate MP3 is indistinguishable from a lossless file, unless the mix itself is somehow different. If you need software to find a difference you wouldn't hear by ear, what's the point? Just listen. Don't analyze so much.

ALSO also, you can be damn sure a site like Qobuz, or wherever this lossless version is from has QC that stops some up-sampled garbage from getting through. No decent engineer at the output phase is going to create MP3s only to transcode them, and CERTAINLY not one sitting at Trent Reznor's console!

The FLAC is coming up as "upsampled" in my lossless audio checker. Seems the FLAC is just the MP3 version upsampled. I didn't notice a difference by ear either.

There is no absolute way of knowing this.

Unless you ask the mixers and creators directly invovled to the score.
Right from the first recording down to the final product before sending to digital stores.

All software uses placebo black magic and should be taken a lot to consider.

Given that it's synth maestro's like Reznor and Atticus, it's very likely they never made music that "LOOKS" lossless.
A lot of these synth composers don't produce real music.
Hi-def is completely wasted on these people.

Even the Revenant score in hi-def was a waste.
A lot of people accused the label of releasing a lossy score.
But Ryuichi Sakamoto is also another synth monster.
Their music doesn't need details.

Even "listening" won't reveal all too much.
If the music was produced with cutoffs and no details, you'll never hear a difference between lossy and lossless compression.
Unless an ancient MP3 library was used at low bitrates.

tl;dr, given the composers, there's no real music and nothing to complain about.

Want to make a difference?
Contact the two composers directly with spectrograms and AudioChecker.logs. :laugh:

Even TAUsoftware uses pretty much the same method as Audiochecker.exe and other garbage software.

I think for a more "accurate" test, you would need to rip the CD.
Actual retail album. Not a CD-R made at home from digital download purchase/piracy.

You know, you could have said what you needed to without being a jerk and a complete music snob.

Anyway, I'm guessing it is upsampled from MP3 since it only seems to be available on places like iTunes and Amazon at the moment. If the OP could give us a clue where he got this FLAC version from, it would really help.

You know, you could have said what you needed to without being a jerk and a complete music snob.

There's nothing in any of the posts to suggest any negative intentions or remarks. Just mere facts and opinions.

Anyhow, it seems the common thing for Reznor & Ross scores to be low in frequency a lot of the time, so it being lossy wouldn't hurt it much.

There's nothing in any of the posts to suggest any negative intentions or remarks. Just mere facts and opinions.

I beg to differ.


A lot of these synth composers don't produce real music.
Hi-def is completely wasted on these people.


Their music doesn't need details.


tl;dr, given the composers, there's no real music and nothing to complain about.

They "...don't produce real music"? "Their music doesn't need details"? "There's no real music"?

How is that NOT negative?

Look, their music may not be for everyone, but to say that it doesn't matter if it's a lossless source because they don't make "real music" is completely silly.

That's all fine and fair then. Still a matter of opinion, but you have a point. Besides, I now have actual proof!



That should be enough to prove the authenticity of it (which can be purchased here (http://tidal.com/us/store/album/69223640)). However, most tracks will look like this:



That's generally what their work looks like, but it doesn't mean it's lossy. Always be careful of what you say.

(The FYC is lossless as well, btw).

Thanks

Thank you!