Which is better?



Saskatchewan

Saskatchewan

Best Online Casinos in Saskatchewan for 2026 Online casinos in Saskatchewan fall into two legal tiers, and the difference decides ...
Quebec

Quebec

Best Online Casinos in Quebec 2026: Compare Legal Options, Bonuses & Payments Online casinos in Quebec come down to two ...
Nunavut

Nunavut

Best Online Casinos in Nunavut 2026: Bonuses & Safe Real Money Play Online casinos in Nunavut all sit offshore. The ...
Prince Edward Island

Prince Edward Island

Online Casinos in PEI: How Prince Edward Island Players Choose a Safe Site in 2026 Online casinos in PEI are ...
Nova Scotia

Nova Scotia

Online Casinos in Nova Scotia 2026: What to Check Before You Join Online casinos in Nova Scotia split into two ...
Newfoundland and Labrador

Newfoundland and Labrador

Best Online Casinos in Newfoundland and Labrador 2026: Legal Play, Bonuses & Withdrawals Online casinos in Newfoundland and Labrador fall ...
New Brunswick

New Brunswick

Best Online Casinos in New Brunswick: Compare Legal Sites in 2026 Online casinos in New Brunswick split into two camps ...
Manitoba

Manitoba

Top Online Casinos in Manitoba: Legal Guide and Reviews 2026 Online casinos in Manitoba reach players through two separate channels, ...
British Columbia

British Columbia

Online Casinos in British Columbia: Legality and Trusted Options in 2026 Online casinos in British Columbia reach players through two ...
Alberta

Alberta

Online Casinos in Alberta 2026: Regulated Online Gambling Sites and Top Offshore Options Online casinos in Alberta now sit on ...
fftiffa
11-29-2018, 10:23 AM
Same flac with different rip method.

https://imgur.com/a/ymdyQTy


Zeratul13
11-30-2018, 05:38 PM
top having better overall blend (not cutoff 20k). but 320mp3, so overall decent, but not lossless.

tehƧP@ƦKly�ANK� -Ⅲ�
12-02-2018, 02:46 AM
top having better overall blend (not cutoff 20k)

But its just peak extended. It’s mirrored information just to reach the roof.

Not that anyone can hear that range, anyway.
Which is what makes lowpass ideal for lossy encodes.

You don’t have to waste bits on fake data like the top image.
So all the bits go towards the useful range of audio that most can hear.

The top image is saturating the bandwidth. Lossy can only do so much, hence the name: lossy.

tl;dr: Top image = fake. bottom image = better


fakeasd
12-05-2018, 05:49 AM
But its just peak extended. It’s mirrored information just to reach the roof.

Not that anyone can hear that range, anyway.
Which is what makes lowpass ideal for lossy encodes.

You don’t have to waste bits on fake data like the top image.
So all the bits go towards the useful range of audio that most can hear.

The top image is saturating the bandwidth. Lossy can only do so much, hence the name: lossy.

tl;dr: Top image = fake. bottom image = better
But why the first image is more "granulated" (empty space between) than the second one.


Connor_simsun
01-15-2019, 09:30 PM
Second one looks good

B@d@pple
01-20-2019, 11:53 PM
The first one.

If not, then the second one.

But definitely not that one.


Scroll to Top