Glimmer of Light



Nova Scotia

Nova Scotia

Online Casinos in Nova Scotia 2026: What to Check Before You Join Online casinos in Nova Scotia split into two ...
Newfoundland and Labrador

Newfoundland and Labrador

Best Online Casinos in Newfoundland and Labrador 2026: Legal Play, Bonuses & Withdrawals Online casinos in Newfoundland and Labrador fall ...
New Brunswick

New Brunswick

Best Online Casinos in New Brunswick: Compare Legal Sites in 2026 Online casinos in New Brunswick split into two camps ...
Manitoba

Manitoba

Top Online Casinos in Manitoba: Legal Guide and Reviews 2026 Online casinos in Manitoba reach players through two separate channels, ...
British Columbia

British Columbia

Online Casinos in British Columbia: Legality and Trusted Options in 2026 Online casinos in British Columbia reach players through two ...
Alberta

Alberta

Online Casinos in Alberta 2026: Regulated Online Gambling Sites and Top Offshore Options Online casinos in Alberta now sit on ...
Yukon

Yukon

Best Online Casinos in Yukon 2026: Bonuses, Legal Status and Interac Payments Online casinos in Yukon all operate offshore. The ...
Low Wagering

Low Wagering

Low Wagering Casino Bonus in Canada A low wagering casino bonus in Canada has a 25x or less playthrough. The ...
Responsible Gambling

Responsible Gambling

Responsible Gambling in Canada: Safer Play Tools, Warning Signs and Support Resources Responsible gambling at casinos in Canada means treating ...
Blackjack

Blackjack

Online Blackjack in Canada for 2026: Safe Sites and Best Tables Online blackjack in Canada is one of the few ...
theone2000
02-05-2016, 11:05 PM


PonyoBellanote
02-05-2016, 11:09 PM
What do you mean? He’s nothing but a terrorist! Anti-american! He steals from the rich!

*Obvious sarcams*


gururu
02-05-2016, 11:23 PM
Is he still high profile enough that an accident won’t happen, I wonder?

Momonoki
02-06-2016, 12:16 AM
I don’t understand, what’s going on in these photos?

HeadphonesGirl
02-06-2016, 02:13 AM
I don’t understand, what’s going on in these photos?

It’s Julian Assange. A UN panel ruled that he is being "detained" at an embassy because he’s afraid if he walks out he’ll be delivered to the US.

I guess it’s a "glimmer" but it doesn’t really mean much. The panel doesn’t have any legal authority to do anything, they’re just expressing an opinion. Sweden is going to sit around and wait forever to try him as soon as he puts his foot out the door.


gururu
02-06-2016, 02:15 AM
First they’d have to prove he’s actually guilty of something.

Momonoki
02-06-2016, 02:19 AM
What is he accused of? Why do people want to get a piece of him?

HeadphonesGirl
02-06-2016, 02:22 AM
No they don’t. Sweden wants to question him in regards to accusations of sexual assault. He has not been convicted of anything but they want to investigate the allegations.

He’s not afraid of answering their questions, but he’s afraid that if he goes into Swedish custody, Sweden will hand him over the US to answer their allegations after getting done with their own investigation. The US would undoubtedly pounce on the chance to try to get him. Whether Sweden would hand him over, who can say. But it’s certainly understandable he’d be afraid of that, especially after what happened to Bradley Manning.

———- Post added at 08:22 PM ———- Previous post was at 08:20 PM ———-

What is he accused of? Why do people want to get a piece of him?

He is the founder of Wikileaks. The US will want to try him for international espionage, or something like that. What he is is a whistle blower, and we have amply demonstrated that what we do to whistle blowers is strip them of their human rights, torture them and destroy their lives.


gururu
02-06-2016, 02:49 AM
You typed "try". And, of course, they can’t try him if he hasn’t been charged with anything. But you are correct about the rest. However, Sweden shares an extradition treaty with the USA, and probably wouldn’t hesitate to hand him off to the Americans for a few krona.

HeadphonesGirl
02-06-2016, 02:59 AM
You typed "try". And, of course, they can’t try him if he hasn’t been charged with anything.

Haha, yeah. I don’t know what I was thinking. That would be the first time the United States government has ever tried someone behind closed doors without publicly charging them.


gururu
02-06-2016, 03:34 AM
I was, of course, referring to the Swedish prosecutor. The US gov’t, on the other hand, has had the indictment prepped and a private cell awaiting him for over 3 years.

HeadphonesGirl
02-06-2016, 04:39 AM
I used the word "tried" in regards to the US government.

The Swedish government, to my knowledge, hasn’t said they want to try him, they’ve said they want to question him about the sexual assault allegations. You can take someone into custody to question them without trying them in court.


Momonoki
02-06-2016, 04:49 AM
Thanks for the info, HeadphonesGirl. I had no idea this was happening, and to be honest I had forgotten about WikiLeaks until now.

Scroll to Top