EU Fines Microsoft over Web Browser



No Deposit

No Deposit

No Deposit Bonus Casino South Africa: How the Offers Really Work A no deposit bonus casino in South Africa is ...
Free Spins

Free Spins

Free Spins Casino Bonuses South Africa: Types, Terms and How to Claim Them Free spins bonuses credit a set number ...
Mobile

Mobile

South African Mobile Casinos: Access, Apps and What Works on a Phone South African mobile casinos are offshore casino sites ...
Pay by Phone

Pay by Phone

Pay by Phone Bill Casinos South Africa: Why the Method Does Not Work and What to Use Instead Pay by ...
OTT Voucher

OTT Voucher

OTT Voucher Online Casino South Africa: How Deposits Work An OTT Voucher online casino in South Africa is an offshore ...
Rand

Rand

South African Online Casinos Accepting Rand: What ZAR Pricing Really Means South African online casinos accepting Rand are offshore sites ...
Instant EFT

Instant EFT

Instant EFT Casino South Africa: How Deposits and Withdrawals Work Instant EFT is a real-time bank payment used at casino ...
High Roller

High Roller

High Roller Casinos in South Africa: VIP Shortlist, Limits and Safety Guide High roller casinos in South Africa are offshore, ...
New

New

New Online Casinos South Africa: How to Check a New Site Before You Play New online casinos in South Africa ...
Bonuses SA

Bonuses SA

Online Casino Bonuses in South Africa: How to Read the Terms Before You Claim Online casino bonuses in South Africa ...
Amaury
03-06-2013, 11:27 PM
Source: MSN News (http://news.uk.msn.com/world/eu-fines-microsoft-over-web-browser)
Published: 3/6/2013

The European Union has fined Microsoft 561 million euro (�484 million) for breaking a pledge to offer personal computer users a choice of internet browsers when they install the company’s flagship Windows operating system.

The penalty imposed by the EU’s executive arm, the European Commission, is a first for Brussels: no company has ever failed to keep its end of a bargain with EU authorities before.

In 2009, Microsoft struck a broad settlement with the commission to resolve disputes over Microsoft’s abuse of the dominance of Windows, which had spanned more than a decade.

The company agreed to pay 860 million euro (�742 million) and promised to give Windows users the option of choosing another browser rather than having Microsoft’s Internet Explorer automatically installed on their machines.

But Microsoft failed to stick to the deal for some 15 million installations of Windows 7 in Europe from May 2011 until July 2012. The company admitted the failure last year, adding that it was an oversight.

The commission’s top regulator, Joaquin Almunia, said at a press conference in Brussels, Belgium, that the fine reflected the size of the violation and the length of time it went on. It was also intended to make an example of Microsoft and deter other companies from doing same thing. "A failure to comply is a very serious infringement that must be sanctioned accordingly," he said.

Mr Almunia has advocated negotiated settlements since he took office in 2010, saying competition issues are best resolved quickly. He says slapping big fines on companies years after the fact does little to help consumers. But he said the whole point of a settlement is undermined when companies then do not abide by its terms. "They must do what they committed to do, or face the consequences," he said.

Mr Almunia conceded that the commission had been "naive" in appointing Microsoft itself to oversee compliance with the agreement, and said the commission will not allow that in the future.

For its part, Microsoft was apologetic. "We take full responsibility for the technical error that caused this problem and have apologised for it," the company said in a statement. "We provided the Commission with a complete and candid assessment of the situation, and we have taken steps … to help avoid this mistake – or anything similar – in the future." The company is required to offer consumers a choice of browsers through 2014.

In all, Microsoft has now paid a total of 2.2 billion euro (�1.9 billion) in fines to the commission since 1998, when regulators opened their first investigation against the company. Some of those fines were for failing to obey the commission’s orders, but this is the first time a company has admitted to breaking a promise made to the EU regulator.


melonofwater
03-08-2013, 12:49 AM
funny how they just gave in to the fine, i can’t see them being able to compete with google or apple in the near future anyway

Antronach
03-09-2013, 07:31 AM
So is it supposed to come installed with several browsers or none? And if the latter, how would they download new browsers without the internet?

If that statement has an obvious answer and you think I should know this, go easy on me, cause I don’t really know.


melonofwater
03-10-2013, 12:19 AM
not sure but europe seems to be pretty tough with customer service laws, the same happened to apple but it was for not making it clear enough that customers didn’t need to get the extended warrantys

Scroll to Top