Anyways the debate i have is over "How you would redo FFX-2 if you didnt like it or if you think it could have been better?"
Answer: In my opinion. I think instead of doing FFX-2 through the point of view of the gullwings, and the after story, it should have been done with a prequel of Braska’s adventure along with Auron and Jecht. A lot of their story seems untouched and it would be great to play a game that goes through their sides of the story. not to mention you could use the final aeon in the end as well as braska’s abilities and Jecht’s. This is just my opinion however but i would like to hear anyone elses as well
I quite frankly don’t know what else the game could be about but what it was about.You could argue that maybe they should have included some guys in the party even as temporary guest party members and maybe had Leblanc be more of a hard core villian along the lines of Ultimecia as opposed to the goofball she was.
I just have 1 question on the Braska/Jecht/Auron thing, cuz I played FF X soooo long ago and can’t really remember some stuff: is it ever explained how the F did Jecht get to Spira?
The fayth…or something. Tidus just says that Jecht went on a ship and never came back. I think it had something to do with the fayth in Dream Zanarkand dreaming up Jecht and Tidus so that Tidus could finally defeat the final aeon and Yu Yevon and finally bring them to rest. Don’t quote me on that though, I’m not an expert.
As for the topic of the thread, I think that the only sequel that I’d ever want to see would be the prequel of Braska’s journey. But that too would probably only be three controllable characters. And again, we’d have a stupid dunce from Zanarkand who didn’t know anything about Spira, and Auron and Braska would just be teaching him the same things we already found out in FFX. Plus, we know how all three meet, we know how the relationships between them pan out, and we know how the situation ended, so it’s kind of unnecessary. We know that they wouldn’t be able to beat Sin. They’d probably have to create another side enemy (as Seymour was in FFX), and that probably would just seem arbitrary. I think that the real FFX-2 was fine, even though I thought the whole Vegnagun/Shuyin thing was completely contrived. I like the idea of a prequel, but like Angrywolf said, it is kind of unnecessary–although probably a lot of fun gameplay-wise.
I actually think it’s a very solid RPG. The battle system is amazing (much better than FFX) and harkens back to the FFV job system via the dress spheres.
Yes the story was shit, the characters were no different. But I still have a major crush on Balarai and enjoyed grinding out everyone and aiming for 100%
…Then again I think whoever thought of combining Gears of War and RPG (otherwise known as Mass Effect) should be shot 😛
And regarding the job system, I kinda liked it more as it was for example in FF IX, each character had a set job and couldn’t drift away from it, it was amazing.
Yes the story was shit, the characters were no different. But I still have a major crush on Balarai and enjoyed grinding out everyone and aiming for 100%
X-2 was a damn abomination… and there was nothing special about FFX for it to warrant a sequel. Fan service was what sold X-2, nothing more, nothing less.
…Then again I think whoever thought of combining Gears of War and RPG (otherwise known as Mass Effect) should be shot 😛
… are we going to have a arguement over this?
Fix’d…
Mass Effect is the best series that BioWare ever pulled.
Not at all. You hate X-2, I loathe Mass Effect. That is all.
That’s your opinion, and you’re entitled to it. However, speaking as someone who has finished both with 100% complete, Mass Effect is superior to X-2 in almost every way. X-2 didn’t need to be made at all, as all it was is fan service (and if people think otherwise, that’s their choice but to me, they’re just deluding themselves). If Hironobu Sakaguchi was still with SE at the time of X-2, he wouldn’t of allowed it to be made, same with the FFVII/XII compilation, as he envisioned each FF to be a whole story in themselves, with no need for prequels/sequels etc.
At least Mass Effect was original (in a sense) and as a western RPG/ARPG, I felt it was aimed at a more mature market, as JRPG’s haven’t changed much over the years. Young moody protaganist, joined with a bunch of misfits, with some vague goal to accomplish. Don’t get me wrong, I did enjoy JRPG’s when I was younger… However over the years, I’ve grown disenchanted with JRPG’s as a whole, and do prefer WRPG’s (With some exceptions… couldn’t get into Elder Scrolls… But I admit, I’m a fan of BioWare and their games).
Still… to each their own. The FF series, to me that is, went downhill with X… the FF series needs to be taken out behind the shed and put out of it’s misery, as the recent installments (not including XI or XIV.. as they are MMORPG’s, and they’re a different beast altogether), haven’t been as good as the earlier ones.
I also disagree that FFX-2 is just fanservice. I *hate* FFX with an absolute vengeance, but I love FFX-2. It actually seems that most people either like one or the other of FFX and FFX-2. The only fanservice moment that I remember is that you can resurrect Tidus – which I earned the right to do, but then refused, as I despise that character!
The fans of FFX are the ones who complain the loudest about FFX-2. And I’m not unsympathetic to them, because the tone is so different, and the new direction Yuna is taken in, is quite drastic (I think she’s much better in X-2, but again I’m not a fan of X). So as much as I like FFX-2, I do wonder how I’d feel if a sequel to a game I liked was released, with such drastic alterations.
Oh wait, no I don’t – I already know, because I’ve played Mass Effect 2…
X-2 IS fan service… and I hated every minute of it. No game is 100% universally accepted as being ‘Perfect’, because that kind of perfection doesn’t exist… Unless you’re Borg. Each person has their own opinion of what is perfect, and to me… the FF series has declined since the PSX generation.
… Why bash ME2 eh? Haven’t we done so enough already lol.
And I didn’t say FF was getting better as it went along (I like FF13 more than many here, but its still not in my Top 5). I just don’t think the series is on a purely downward curve. I thought FF9 and FF10 showed the series trending downward, but then 12 came along and restored my faith.
The series’ installments are basically just standalone games, connected by the loosest of thematic concepts. They don’t have the same characters, worlds, systems or stories, so each new installment has the same chance of being something great or awful, no matter how much time passes. The only factors that matter are the budget available and quality of staff working on them.
All the old games from the golden era of popularity (from about FF7 through to FF10 or so), had different directors. So its really just pot luck. The series has stagnated (IMO) primarily due to using the same director too many times recently (the guy who did FF13, also did FFX-2, FF12: Revenant Wings and was a senior contributor for FFX). I think he’s also doing FF13-2.
That’s where they’re going wrong for me – they need to go back to using different guys for each installment. That way, you avoid them looking the same, feeling the same etc.
And my bashing of ME2 knows no satiety – I have no forgiveness in my heart! 😀
I would imagine that FFX fans also feel the same about FFX-2. Many FF13 fans are also questioning how appropriate a time travel story with Serah as the main character really is in FF13-2…
These sequels are almost always by different writers and directors (plus different staff for everything else too in many cases), so the characters, world and story will be being interpreted in a different way. (FF12 actually has this in the original game itself because of the change in directors, and most consider it to have harmed the game).
I said before that I think different directors and writers should be used, but *not* to write sequels. You’ll almost always win new fans, but lose all your old ones. And since fans consider that any sequel should really be for them to repay their loyalty and investment in the original, that creates ill feeling.
I agree with the rest of your post, but feel compelled to comment on this: Mass Effect 2 isn’t a sequel per se, but as the second part of a trilogy, it’s a continuation. IIRC, BioWare stated that the story of Mass Effect was completed (ME1-> ME2-> ME3) before ME1 was even finished.
I believe that they probably had a rough framework, and did intend for the series to be a trilogy. But as I’ve said many times, ME2 just seems like a massive retcon filled, feet shuffling, waste of time. If it wasn’t for the fact that the graphics and beefed up action took the game overground to the mainstream, ME2 would have been the installment that the series forgot, IMO.
Anyway, I think FFX-2 is practically a standalone game and not a sequel at all. Because FFX fans hate it and won’t admit it legitimacy, and because most FFX-2 fans don’t seem to have liked FFX much anyway, there isn’t much evidence that many people view them as 2 parts of the same story, or play them as such. People just choose the one they like, and forget about the other one.
I believe that they probably had a rough framework, and did intend for the series to be a trilogy. But as I’ve said many times, ME2 just seems like a massive retcon filled, feet shuffling, waste of time. If it wasn’t for the fact that the graphics and beefed up action took the game overground to the mainstream, ME2 would have been the installment that the series forgot, IMO.
To quote Jason Lee’s character, Brodie, from Mallrats:
"Oh ye of little faith… have a cookie."