thanks for the advice

What's the status on trailer music company: Pfeifer Broz. Music?

I think all trailer music is ok to post now, except Two Steps From Hell.

Yesterday, 06:01 PM

Today, 02:54 AM

: slowclap :

I went with the PM system for safe measure.

I was notified by Yen_ that Alexander The Great And Other Rare Rosenman (Soundtrack by Leonard Rosenman) 2012 published by Film Music Society, has retri��es to share.
Already rebusquei this thread as your statement, and found nothing.
Please help me.
Yen_ is serious and not miss the truth.
thank you very much

Am I allowed to post links publicly for this (http://www.discogs.com/Marco-Beltrami-Resident-Evil-Expanded-Original-Motion-Picture-Score/release/2603290), or do I need to send them around via PM?

thanks for this

Thanks for this thread. If I ever upload something I'm gonna read it.

Am I allowed to post links publicly for this (http://www.discogs.com/Marco-Beltrami-Resident-Evil-Expanded-Original-Motion-Picture-Score/release/2603290), or do I need to send them around via PM?

A personal message...ALL Resident Evil titles are on the no post list.

It's sad that any Bioshazard (resident evil) material, including the "Out of print" arrange music, is not allowed on here. Hopefully the out-of-print material becomes available for sale again.


NineEyes9Nines

.

Any idea why Bioshock and Resident Evil can't be posted? It seems weird that two totally different franchises are not allowed on here.

...or do you mean Biohazard?

totally franchises.



What is a "totally franchise" ?.

I accidentally a word. I meant to say "totally different franchises".

Film Score Monthly is not allowed to share openly right?

Yes.

Any idea why Bioshock and Resident Evil can't be posted? It seems weird that two totally different franchises are not allowed on here.

...or do you mean Biohazard?
I don't believe that's an error, the ban applies to both Bioshock and BIOHAZARD/Resident Evil. In regards to the latter: the Staff received takedown requests and it was decided, to stay on the safe side, to put the franchise as a whole (movies/games related stuff, both official and unofficial) on the banned-material list.

Not that doing so actually changes anything, we know all too well how things go with the likes of Varese+Film Score Monthly's stuff. If you want my take on the matter, I would delete also threads where folks state to send them private messages, but I can go by whatever the Staff is okay with.

I'm assuming anything from Warner Music Group would be banned.

I have emailed people responsible for this web site, including [email protected], asking you guys to include MovieScore Media and Screamworks Records on the list of labels whose stuff you CAN NOT post here for copyright/legal reasons. I sent this email to [email protected] on August 19 but still haven't seen any mention of this here.

So, I post myself. ANY UNAUTHORIZED DOWNLOAD LINKS TO RELEASES BY MOVIESCORE MEDIA and SCREAMWORKS RECORDS are NOT allowed to be posted here on this forum.

Thanks!

That sounded so barbaric.

In fact: IT'S BARBARIC!!!

I have emailed people responsible for this web site, including [email protected], asking you guys to include MovieScore Media and Screamworks Records on the list of labels whose stuff you CAN NOT post here for copyright/legal reasons. I sent this email to [email protected] on August 19 but still haven't seen any mention of this here.

So, I post myself. ANY UNAUTHORIZED DOWNLOAD LINKS TO RELEASES BY MOVIESCORE MEDIA and SCREAMWORKS RECORDS are NOT allowed to be posted here on this forum.

Thanks!

Meh. You must contact admin and take it up with them. Until then I will hunt down every title ever released and post it. Just for the caps lock.

**said in an ironic, attempt at humor sort of way**

Seriously though, if you contact admin through the correct channels, in the correct way with a take down notice, they have always respected that. But unless admin tell us otherwise, your random postings will not sway the majority here.

I hope not. It seems to be going pretty strong still considering ur post date : )

what about goldeneye from virgin records?

Sorry to repeat this, but I can't seem to find the answer to what does "Two Steps from Hell" mean?

Sorry to repeat this, but I can't seem to find the answer to what does "Two Steps from Hell" mean?

Two Steps from Hell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Steps_from_Hell)

Google is you friend ;)

Two Steps from Hell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Steps_from_Hell)

Google is you friend ;)Yeah, but you need to look a little deeper than Wikipedia. It's the name of a band, yes. The phrase refers to how far it is between Heaven and Hell; 2 steps. See the viewer comments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEq7hFgXo2w

Well... put a question like that in a thread like this and my link would be the obvious answer. If the question indeed was "What does THE EXPRESSION Two Steps from Hell mean?" it could have been made a little clearer ;)

Would it be better for them to say "because we made things to sell and you're stealing them?"

Would it be better for them to say "because we made things to sell and you're stealing them?" Within the context of this conversation, I don't even know what that means. For me, the best selling musicians in the world are ones that I can listen to for free. If I can't listen for free, I'm probably never gonna hear it. If I never hear it, I'm probably never going to buy it.

Would it be better for them to say "because we made things to sell and you're stealing them?"

Same here... not quite sure WHAT that was a reply to?

Someone gave me rep today for sharing David Arnold's Godzilla from La-La Land records, which I posted back in January of 2014 (thanks for the rep whomever you are). However, they said that it was forum rules that LLL links cannot be shared freely/publicly - is this something new? I know that Varese is a big no-no, but have never heard of LLL links being blacklisted.

LLL links can be share openly

LLL links can be share openly

Thanks laohu!

list is updated.

edit: nothing from PATRICK DOYLE.

Oh shit, this is new 0_0

Yeah, that's why my Cinderella thread is gone! Very nice.

... and no chance of an ERAGON Recording Session posting... ever... :-(

I didn't even notice that...

The list keeps getting bigger.
:laugh: I wonder what would happen the day HZ gets blacklisted. :laugh:

---------- Post added at 10:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:21 AM ----------


why my Cinderella thread is gone!

is this part of the operation now? can't create a thread to say "PM me" ?

It must have been serious.

No Doyle? That's a new one.

I guess that's one less Harry Potter end credit for you to worry about adding to your thread, Sparktank. :p

that's one less Harry Potter end credit for you to worry about adding to your thread, Sparktank. :p

And Rise of the Planet of the Apes.
But, that one was a messy end credits, anyhow. More suited for film watching than listening.

you guys are acting like you simply cannot post doyle it'll be like other non-postable music pm-only amiright

Well, I was going to ask if anyone had "Lavenders Blue" from the new Cinderella. But, Patrick Doyle is a big no-no here apparently.

But seriously, the song your lead sings doesn't get released? Who the hell decided on that?

No Patrick Doyle? Oh man glad I got the Goblet of Fire sessions while I still could!

PMs for Doyle's stuff are still ok though, right?

PMs for Doyle's stuff are still ok though, right?

I'm not so sure. Some people I think have had entire threads deleted by mods if it had Doyle stuff, not just had their links removed, which indicates no Doyle period. Then again, there's a Cinderalla thread right here (Thread 187122) that's PM-only, so we'll see what happens with that thread.

It all probably has something to do with last week's super-leaks.

I'm not so sure. Some people I think have had entire threads deleted by mods if it had Doyle stuff, not just had their links removed, which indicates no Doyle period. Then again, there's a Cinderalla thread right here (Thread 187122) that's PM-only, so we'll see what happens with that thread.

It all probably has something to do with last week's super-leaks.

But was any Doyle leaked last week?

You guys can PM a mod to be sure.


Then again, there's a Cinderalla thread right here (Thread 187122) that's PM-only

That was created after the fact. OP didn't realize the rule was in place.
Mods for this part of the forum are pre-occupied so we're spoiled a little bit over here.

---------- Post added at 10:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:03 AM ----------


But was any Doyle leaked last week?

Just the new Cinderella retail album.
But, the 2 HP that leaked probably drew attention and then whoever it was, looked up all HP to find Doyle and then set things in motion.

Thomas Bergersen and Nick Phoenix created Two Steps From Hell.
Should any solo albums by Bergensen and Phoenix also be included in the ban list?

Albums like "Illusions" and "Sun" by Bergensen are listed as TSFH material in the eyes of Extreme Music. (https://www.extrememusic.com/labels/18)

That's what I thought. Some other forums give credit to TSFH as well.

is x-men days of future past - the rouge cut considered not allowed?

i mean, it's pretty much the like the complete version, that was pulled upon mr. ottman's request.
if the rouge cut is considered equal, i wont bother posting it.

is x-men days of future past - the rouge cut considered not allowed?

i mean, it's pretty much the like the complete version, that was pulled upon mr. ottman's request.
if the rouge cut is considered equal, i wont bother posting it.

I believe the primary reason Ottman wanted it pulled in the first place was so that he could boost sales for the Rogue Cut release.

i figured that much. but i doubt mr. ottman will say "you can share rouge cut, but don't share the complete edition."

hmm... maybe it's better to leave this of the board. this may cause more trouble and that sort of stress is not worth it.

Yeah so I'd wait on posting it, just so it could make some sales for a bit. Now watch some ass post the full thing lol

I was checking it out last night and compared to the expanded set, it's actually shorter.

Yeah so I'd wait on posting it, just so it could make some sales for a bit.

good point dak :)


I was checking it out last night and compared to the expanded set, it's actually shorter.

someone mentioned this a few days ago. i think it was lockdown.

I was checking it out last night and compared to the expanded set, it's actually shorter.

It doesn't include the film version of "Time's Up", which is kinda weird.

It has the film version of the main titles though which is a plus

:laugh: You can always ask Ottman, personally, to see if it's okay to pirate his music now.

Kronos Records has been added to the list.

edited; no content from Scarlet Moon Productions may be posted now.

From now on no threads are to be created for music from Varese Sarabande.

I have also had to delete a few threads, just in case people are wondering where they have gone to.

jessie, this means varese releases are not even tolerated through pm anymore?

Well, I certainly have bad timing, don't I?

Well this fucking blows

:/

Did someone report us to Varese? Did they JUST realize this? Cuz it's been years like this

Have their numbers gone down lately, so they decided to fight piracy thinking that's the fault?

Whatever it is, this is terrible news.

Oh Well Whats Done Is Done.

Well this fucking blows

:/

Uh-huh. :notgood:


Did someone report us to Varese? Did they JUST realize this? Cuz it's been years like this

Have their numbers gone down lately, so they decided to fight piracy thinking that's the fault?

Whatever it is, this is terrible news.

I would hate for this to be the case.


Oh Well Whats Done Is Done.

I guess. :notgood:

jessie, this means varese releases are not even tolerated through pm anymore?
While I like to think nobody would monitor PMs, no more threads "advertising" Varese releases can be created, that means it would be best for you to not tell anyone to PM you, either, that is if you care about your account and what's linked to it. I have a feeling sharing of Varese won't be tolerated, period.
Jessie, should we take the same approach for the remaining banned material? I've closed a few threads over at the VGM forum, but I noticed you mass-deleted threads about Resident Evil releases, so, what do you want me to do? I don't have a problems with deleting threads advertising/PM-sharing banned material (oh, we'd have to delete the Lossless VG thread, if that's the case, let me do that XD), I always found it silly+risky to keep threads around.

For those wondering, this place has been already reported by a Shriner to the likes of Varese years ago, the "half-ban" of Varese was also a consequence of that action.

So Everyone... Soon This Will Be Just A Discussion Site... Well..Sort Of... If At All LOL

That's too bad. On the other hand, the most interesting releases these days are done by LaLaLand and Intrada anyway, so I personally can live with a complete Varese ban.

That's too bad. On the other hand, the most interesting releases these days are done by LaLaLand and Intrada anyway, so I personally can live with a complete Varese ban.

Mmmmm you sure about that? Do you know just how many scores are owned by Varese?

And soon, with all of our focus on Intrada and La-La Land, we'll squeeze the life out their profits, and THEN we'll just be a discussion site!

As I Said.... :awsm:

Mmmmm you sure about that? Do you know just how many scores are owned by Varese?

I'm quite aware of that, but I was speaking of NEW releases. The last interesting Varese release for me personally was Star Trek Into Darkness. Others may feel differently... different tastes, different preferences.

---------- Post added at 12:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 PM ----------


And soon, with all of our focus on Intrada and La-La Land, we'll squeeze the life out their profits, and THEN we'll just be a discussion site!

That's EXACTLY why we should be more patient with new releases. Give the labels time to sell their limited releases, wait several weeks or a few months, and THEN share them. That's a win-win scenario for the labels and for people who wouldn't buy the scores and, at the same time, have the patience to wait for them to appear here. (At least, that's the theory... mostly, that won't happen.)

True. And I can't recall the last good Varese release off the top of my head (maybe The Final Girls), but I think this will put a dent in the forum.


That's EXACTLY why we should be more patient with new releases. Give the labels time to sell their limited releases, wait several weeks or a few months, and THEN share them. That's a win-win scenario for the labels and for people who wouldn't buy the scores and, at the same time, have the patience to wait for them to appear here. (At least, that's the theory... mostly, that won't happen.)

I agree with this completely. I think Braveheart was posted twice (on the same day) within days of it being released. I think there should be *some* kind of ban on LLL and Intrada releases. Like maybe not being able to post them until it's been a solid month after release or something.

^Sounds about right with me.

As I Said.... :awsm:

Simply reiterating! Expounding if you will, including ideas put forth in posts that followed yours! I'm here for the discussion, man!

Simply reiterating! Expounding if you will, including ideas put forth in posts that followed yours! I'm here for the discussion, man!

Aye, I Hear Ya Man! ;)

True. And I can't recall the last good Varese release off the top of my head (maybe The Final Girls), but I think this will put a dent in the forum.



I agree with this completely. I think Braveheart was posted twice (on the same day) within days of it being released. I think there should be *some* kind of ban on LLL and Intrada releases. Like maybe not being able to post them until it's been a solid month after release or something.

I would absolutely be fine with this.

And then there are all those pesky sessions ripe for editing�Demolition Man, being just one example. Alas, poor Yorick!

Ouch. I wonder what the major release was that pushed us over the cliff.

+1 on holding off on LLL/I releases when they're first released.

Holding out on posting wouldn't do as much good as you think, folks. Why? Because last time I checked this place was still well-indexed among the likes of Google, that translates into someone searching Intrada, OST download and the Shrine being among the first results listed. At the end of the day, they'll come knocking and it won't mean shit to them that you waited weeks/months to post something. Enjoy what you have left, while it lasts.

I knew someone would call it's the doom of the Shrine, lol

Holding out on posting wouldn't do as much good as you think, folks. Why? Because last time I checked this place was still well-indexed among the likes of Google, that translates into someone searching Intrada, OST download and the Shrine being among the first results listed. At the end of the day, they'll come knocking and it won't mean shit to them that you waited weeks/months to post something. Enjoy what you have left, while it lasts.

We'll burn out bright at least.

The brightest candles burn the fastest~
-someone who said it

---------- Post added at 11:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:55 AM ----------

It was from Blade Runner...

The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long - and you have burned so very, very brightly, Roy.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658/quotes?item=qt0378263

Holding out on posting wouldn't do as much good as you think, folks. Why? Because last time I checked this place was still well-indexed among the likes of Google, that translates into someone searching Intrada, OST download and the Shrine being among the first results listed. At the end of the day, they'll come knocking and it won't mean shit to them that you waited weeks/months to post something. Enjoy what you have left, while it lasts.

Right.

If a site like this can turn up on a Google search, the time until our demise, shortens.


We'll burn out bright at least.

Amen!

Oh my dear, if I had a dollar for everytime the Shrine was told that it'd succumb and die.

I'd buy a couple of CDs.

^ That Would Be A First LOL... Jokes.

But in All Seriousness This Is A Start.. One Label Then Another, Then People Leave... Ect...

The name of this thread amazes me. :laugh:

Pretty sure no music should be posted due to legal reasons. Lol.

^ That Would Be A First LOL... Jokes.

But in All Seriousness This Is A Start.. One Label Then Another, Then People Leave... Ect...

Do I have to show my physical collection?

Yeah, you thought people were leaving too when shit happened a month ago. No one left, and we're the same as always.

This may make less shares on the forum, but that's all.

The name of this thread amazes me. :laugh:

Pretty sure no music should be posted due to legal reasons. Lol.

If the Shrine dies, we just get no free music. Or at least not as much as we do here. We're too spoiled, I believe.. :p Hey, I'd be one of the people who'd hate it the most since I have no other place to get as much music as here.

But our lives move on. It wouldn't be the end of the world. Other than Sarah who would probably go to jail or get no more money from the place. :P Us? We'd just have one more reason to be bored.

In truth, I took the phrase from a Switchfoot song titled "Burn Out Bright".

If we've only got one try
If we've only got one life
If time was never on our side
Then before I die
I want to burn out bright

However, this place being what it is, Blade Runner is far more appropriate...

But in All Seriousness This Is A Start.. One Label Then Another, Then People Leave... Ect...

+1

Varese, Intrada, La la land etc, are top companies and release great scores. They are top motivations for someone to participate in this forum.
There always are other solutions than banning them. I don't remember seen elsewhere any company ban, at any movies or music prominent forum or tracker.


If a site like this can turn up on a Google search, the time until our demise, shortens.


+1.

Absolutely. If we want security, this has to stop. Like many forums and trackers that are invite only too.
Any site appearing in google is a target.
I am not in favor of closed sites, but we can't have everything in life. If more security is needed, then we will accept the consequences.
Besides, all notable downloading sites I know are invite only. Some of them for hype, some other for security.
And none of them has ever banned a company.
Banning one company will lead to banning more companies, and this is going to be the end of filesharing.

That's EXACTLY why we should be more patient with new releases. Give the labels time to sell their limited releases, wait several weeks or a few months, and THEN share them. That's a win-win scenario for the labels and for people who wouldn't buy the scores and, at the same time, have the patience to wait for them to appear here. (At least, that's the theory... mostly, that won't happen.)



I agree with this completely. I think Braveheart was posted twice (on the same day) within days of it being released. I think there should be *some* kind of ban on LLL and Intrada releases. Like maybe not being able to post them until it's been a solid month after release or something.

postponing a share wont help sales that much, because the releases will just show up on other sites and spread from there.



True. And I can't recall the last good Varese release off the top of my head (maybe The Final Girls), but I think this will put a dent in the forum.

what about the nightmare on elm street box set, predator 2, back to the future 3, chain reaction dlx?

to this day it made me wonder why la-la land, intrada, quartet and other labels haven't come here and say "this has to stop". but maybe they know it wont fix the problem sharing.
i also doubt that many would be the releases if they aren't shared. most folks here simply don't bother with buying anything at all. the current full ban of varese release may not be a problem due to low sales.
i think the problem could be more of shares from cutting edge. at one time releases from there where dropped like candy and that wasn't a good thing. but that's just a guess. jessie may know about the varese ban and can put some light on it.

I think the soundtracks sell good enough, but they think we are stealing possible numbers/sales from them nonetheless.

http://mrwgifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Oh-My-God-Who-The-Hell-Cares-Gif-On-Family-Guy.gif

The rules are the rules, stop trying to analyze them.

+1

Varese, Intrada, La la land etc, are top companies and release great scores. They are top motivations for someone to participate in this forum.
There always are other solutions than banning them. I don't remember seen elsewhere any company ban, at any movies or music prominent forum or tracker.



+1.

Absolutely. If we want security, this has to stop. Like many forums and trackers that are invite only too.
Any site appearing in google is a target.
I am not in favor of closed sites, but we can't have everything in life. If more security is needed, then we will accept the consequences.
Besides, all notable downloading sites I know are invite only. Some of them for hype, some other for security.
And none of them has ever banned a company.
Banning one company will lead to banning more companies, and this is going to be the end of filesharing.

It is my understanding that the Shrine will never go invite-only: a huge deal of this place's success comes from the fact anyone could easily join and share, if he/she wishes so.

Companies/works from certain composers get banned because, basically, this place would otherwise seriously risk legal troubles. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want the whole place risking to get shutdown just because nowhere else a label gets banned; in case you don't know, the Shrine has been… Err… Infamously famous for years. It is known to be a cove of pirates. Of course other places don't get as much of this crap, they aren't that famous.

That's too bad. On the other hand, the most interesting releases these days are done by LaLaLand and Intrada anyway, so I personally can live with a complete Varese ban.

Until those labels are banned too of course. ;)

so how me share new varese release !? THIS DJAWADI ! PAIN!!!! ((((()))))))(((()()()

so how me share new varese release !? THIS DJAWADI ! PAIN!!!! ((((()))))))(((()()()

I'll tell you how; not doing it. It is now forbidden, so you have to deal with it. Forum rules.

thank you, I'm happy now, and i can begin to commit suicide.

thank you, I'm happy now, and i can begin to commit suicide.

:facepalm:

Your life doesn't end here, you can post your stuff anywhere else like the other mass uploader people do.

Joking with suicide, also, is not really nice..

Joking with suicide, also, is not really nice..
I always so joke with dogs xd

I don't think it's fair that a small label like Saimel, which presses no more than 350 units of each release, has his latest release (Arnau Bataller's VULCANIA) here before it hits the streets. One thing is sharing a title months after his release, but prior to it? I think it's a line that should have never been crossed, the person who posted it is damaging a small label, and probaby that label will do as much as he can to protect his rights, and the guy posting that score is doing it for profit with his double link to access the download page, and that also should be prohibited. I thought this was a place to share scores, not a place where people want as much hits as possible on his downloads to make money.

We aren't really in any moral position to tell others what they should, or shouldn't do, when dealing with certain releases. As a matter of fact, this is simply a place where "piracy happens", with its own set of rules. As I've previously stated, a label won't really care you waited "#" number of days/weeks/months to post its release; still illegal and they'll bring down the offending link as soon as they take notice of it.

If the leak shows up here, it most likely showed up elsewhere, first� Damage done, already. At the time of this post the forum still allows X until the label shows up and request/demand we put a stop to it. It is my understanding the Shrine has never cared about small or big labels, in that sense, we treat every single one of them equally.
And while I may be sympathetic to a few points you have brought up, I ask you to remember that a large part of the active Staff is comprised of volunteers, we can't really devote time to check whether a label is big or small, we act when they request us to do so.

The label already known of this share, it's up to them to take the actions they consider. What I don't approve is the use of link after link to access to a shared file, even when most of those links contain malware that can damage your computer. In that case I'm in moral position to criticise that, and he shouldn't do that because he risks our computers, and he just does it to get a profit with each double hit. That's pure piracy, not sharing.

strk_freak
1) i buy release "Vulcania" - my share be not prior to sales
2) I share very much, and people are willing to watch ads, that i bought new releases.
3) if not, people write me in pm, and i give them direct link on mega.
please, do not pretend, that i'm such a bad

Sometimes annoying anonymizers/redirects/link-shorteners are used so that the download-links might remain active a bit longer. In case of harmful redirects, please take the time to report the link(s) to the Staff, might also be a nice idea to notify the user about it.
The presence of crap on such sites is often the fault of those managing ads/external scripts; I can't really help dealing with either, been a Firefox user for years and stuff like AdBlock+NoScript kept me rather safe.
You may want to consider running a scan of your computer, there's also to consider the chance you have been previously infected.

1) I've talked to Juan Angel Saiz, owner of the label Saimel, and he told me that the CD is still being pressed, so...where did you buy it?. What you have posted it's a simple spotify rip (you can't buy there, just listen), the only place where I've been able to find it. It's not at itunes yet, he confirmed me it also. So you haven't buy it
2) People are willing to watch ads? and get malware or viruses? anytime I click on your mega button, my antivirus software blocks the second link because it has malware. You don't buy anything, most of your stuff is from Spotify.
3) I'm not saying you're a bad guy, I just thing that it's inmoral to fuck those small labels that release scores with a lot of effort, and many times knowing they won't recover the inversion, "sharing" those titles. You're free to do whatever you want, but be advised the label is free to take legal actions against you and the forum.

---------- Post added at 06:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:58 AM ----------

Leon, the links that Bart Oss puts are just for profit, not for keeping alive a link (and he recognises it). I use firefox, adblock and noscript and still the antivirus blocks the page for malware. I've run a scan of my computer all nights, keep it updated everyday and I haven't been infectd in decades, since I'm very carefully. There's not much to say, I end this conversation here. The owner of Saimel is really angry, I know how hard is for him to release a title, you can't image how many taxes and licenses you have to pay, and that effort for nothing now. Support small labels, they don' get rich for doing this, maybe they can get ruined. And I suppose he'll contact administrators or whoever runs this forum to notify them or take legal actions, it's up to him.

strk_freak you carry full garbage...
https://play.google.com/store/music/album/Arnau_Bataller_Vulcania?id=Bnv3ubsjmog2iuzqn77wa5a l3iy

I don't think it's fair that a small label like Saimel, which presses no more than 350 units of each release, has his latest release (Arnau Bataller's VULCANIA) here before it hits the streets. One thing is sharing a title months after his release, but prior to it? I think it's a line that should have never been crossed, the person who posted it is damaging a small label, and probaby that label will do as much as he can to protect his rights, and the guy posting that score is doing it for profit with his double link to access the download page, and that also should be prohibited. I thought this was a place to share scores, not a place where people want as much hits as possible on his downloads to make money.

I totally agree with you. Yes i posted today one new Saimel release but CDrip.

My point of view
Urgently needs to be ban posts with ADDS!!! No other comment is needed

Let's already, ban me, i am shit, Hooray!!!

Let's already, ban me, i am shit, Hooray!!!

You, me, every motherfucker who thinks he 's smart i tried to make money with shit & incomplete uploads!!!
Try to buy CD, support label and then do what you will!!!

Z

@Bart Oss
@zvonko1510:
People, calm down and don't start another war! If you have a personal dispute, keep it on personal messages only, but don't occupy this thread. I've subscribed to this thread to get relevant information as to what's allowed and what's forbidden. I don't want to get each and every post of your personal combat in my personal email inbox. Thanks!

Same here. Only reason I Keep an eye on this thread is for important updates.

I've subscribed to this thread to get relevant information as to what's allowed and what's forbidden.

Well like you see or we get rid of post with ADDS or every day we will lose one Label.
In that way for a half year you don't need to be subscribed to this thread because everything will be prohibited!!!

Z

zvonko1510 where does the advertising? labels prohibit to distribute their material, because they want to increase sales!
if I understand you correctly, or are you talking about this topic... ohh xd

zvonko1510 where does the advertising? labels prohibit to distribute their material, because they want to increase sales!

Seriously? So publisher are thrilled when you post here some GOOGLE PLAY material with ADDS before CD is pressed?
They appreciate your effort to make some money before them?
Area you nuclear physicist? BRAVOOOOO

Well like you see or we get rid of post with ADDS or every day we will lose one Label.
In that way for a half year you don't need to be subscribed to this thread because everything will be prohibited!!!

Z

Yes, that may be the case, but I'm interested in the latest facts, relevant for me today. Speculations about what's happening in the future is irrelevant and has no effect. What's new today is relevant, therefore I want to be kept posted about the latest developments on this thread.

publisher are thrilled when you post here some GOOGLE PLAY material with ADDS before CD is pressed?
I absolutely not meant this...

I absolutely not meant this...
zvonko1510, Bart Oss: start a new thread on the discussion forum please ("The official mega links with google play ADDS discussion thread"), get an interpreter to get a better understanding for each other, and leave this place alone. Please? Pretty, pretty please?

I think the soundtracks sell good enough, but they think we are stealing possible numbers/sales from them nonetheless.


But every link posted is stealing potential sales. Sales numbers are lower than you probably think, for instance LaLaLand's recent Beltrami albums that were sales disasters. The Hitman score and Yuma re-issue combined didn't even sell 1000 copies.

The boutique soundtrack labels aren't huge corporations. In most cases it's 2 or 3 guys who makes their living releasing soundtrack albums. It isn't a license to print money. I think holding off on posting new releases for a month or more is a fine idea...maybe even waiting until they go out of print.

This thread only requires a single post, one solely intended to provide members the necessary information to avoid possible upload infraction(s), and should be locked from any and all discussion.

This thread only requires a single post, one solely intended to provide members the necessary information to avoid possible upload infraction(s), and should be locked from any and all discussion.

Why you don't tell that to Leon Scott Kennedy this morning? May be you need balls?
Anyway, nothing new he did not say, just start discussion!!!

Why you don't tell that to Leon Scott Kennedy this morning? May be you need balls?
Anyway, nothing new he did not say, just start discussion!!!
gururu has a point, this thread could live with just the facts (one post, with updates when necessary), without any discussions. Besides, his remark was directed to the thread as a whole, and that includes you, me, AND Leon Scott Kennedy. No need to get personal, zvonko!

gururu has a point, this thread could live with just the facts (one post, with updates when necessary), without any discussions. Besides, his remark was directed to the thread as a whole, and that includes you, me, AND Leon Scott Kennedy. No need to get personal, zvonko!


Firstly, nothing here is not personal.
Maybe you want only the current information like and other 90% user here who want only link I'm trying to watch a little bit into the future because I'm interested in what will happen to this nice place not only today!!! I 'm supply my collection here at least. Although I am registered on 5 private forums & blogs i love to share in public. So like you see I am very interested in each debate of this kind. As you know already there exist people who can not wait any problem with publishers to promote his crazy idea:

NUKE WHOLE DOWNLOADS SECTION!!!

All the while I'm here I will fight in every possible way against it. My statement here today are just for this purpose.

Z

updated thread, nothing from Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation is allowed here now

Thread has been updated, nothing from the Music Box Records label is allowed.

Music Box Records, you know what happens when a CEO contacts us about removing their content from our forum? You know what happens? Huh? You know what happens? You just made the list!!