http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Games_considered_the_worst_ever

I've had the mischance to have played three of those atrocious games; Clayfighters 63 1/3 (Though, Clay Fighter was worser; glitches galore.), Superman 64 and World War II Combat: Road to Berlin. On the upside, they were only rentals, thankfully.

Too bad Hudson marred the Bomberman series now, if not futhermore, releasing Bomberman: Act Zero, therewith. -.-

lol. i've been LOOKING for this game for a long time. "revolution X"

i remember renting it years ago, and i kinda liked it. it was fun. rofl. but i completely forgot the name. i can't wait to d/l the rom. its hilarous! rofl.


lol i played shaq fu too. but i didn't care for it.

yep. all those pretty much suck.

The Cheetahmen is my new favorite video game.

It's only fitting that superman 64 be there, as far as the rest of the list goes I've only actually heard of a few of these games, and played less of them (thankfully.) Though I thought the box art for the bomberman act zero for the xbox 360 looked interesting, but it still doesn't change that the game sucks, and they should never have done that to bomberman.

clayfighters 63&1/3 is awesome.

It's probably limited to well known titles on well known systems.

What about all the rubbish games that were released up until the videogame crash? What about ET for the 2600?

at least clayfighters or superman didn't bring down the entire market.

anyone ever played suprise suprise for the Amstrad cpc? no? well i assure you it's worse than those other games

http://www.cpcgamereviews.com/s/index21.html

(look down the page)

It's probably limited to well known titles on well known systems.

What about all the rubbish games that were released up until the videogame crash? What about ET for the 2600?

at least clayfighters or superman didn't bring down the entire market.

anyone ever played suprise suprise for the Amstrad cpc? no? well i assure you it's worse than those other games

http://www.cpcgamereviews.com/s/index21.html

(look down the page)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Games_considered_the_worst_ever#E

E.T. is already listed there, below Elf Bowling 1&2. You can always nominate a game to the list therein, providied you follow the criteria, and it's accepted.

My point was that most games are going to be more well known. So it's not going to be all that accurate.

It says that Zelda the wand of gamelon is widely considered the worst zelda game ever. But it's no doubt considered that by way more people than who have played it.

My point was that most games are going to be more well known. So it's not going to be all that accurate.

It says that Zelda the wand of gamelon is widely considered the worst zelda game ever. But it's no doubt considered that by way more people than who have played it.

They're obviously not going to include every single game which was considered horrible. Just the ones which are notoriously known for it.

Games like Zelda the Wand of Gamelon are, overall by the public, deemed terrible. Therefore, for the minority who does appreciate the game, it's catagorized as a 'Cult Classic'.

Apropos, Beat Em' & Eat Em', Custard's Revenge and Burning Desire for the Atari 2600, are also listed.

Why are Elf Bowling 1&2 on there, those are hilarious.

omg why is there a game called Ethnic Cleansing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_Cleansing_(computer_game))

Why are Elf Bowling 1&2 on there, those are hilarious.

I'll highlight the reasons why.

Elf Bowling 1&2 (2005, Nintendo DS) is a bowling game based on the popular games from the Elf Bowling series. The DS version was a direct port; however, many people claim that the DS version of these games is actually worse than the PC version. The animation and the sound are very poorly done, and the gameplay is as restrictive as a single minigame in WarioWare. As IGN says, "It's ho-ho-horrible"

It's just the port. Not the series.

I had no idea about those terrible zelda games. lol. kinda funny though.

SHAQ FU MAN I HAD THAT GAME!

-

They're obviously not going to include every single game which was considered horrible. Just the ones which are notoriously known for it.

Which is why i said it's not accurate.


Games like Zelda the Wand of Gamelon are, overall by the public, deemed terrible. Therefore, for the minority who does appreciate the game, it's catagorized as a 'Cult Classic'.

But they are only basing their opinions on hearsay. You need to have played a game to know if it's bad. Even then your opinion may not be totally 100% agreed upon.

But it's an interesting wikipedia page. :)

Damn. Faulty post.

Please ignore.

Clayfighter 63 1/3
Shaq Fu
Spawn: The Eternal
Superman 64

From that list, those are the only 4 games I've played before, never bought and owned them. Yes they all suck-ass.

From that list and only played Carmageddon 64 and after that I really hate to the N64

It's upsetting about Bubsy, since it was one of my favourite games on the SNES ;(

..Haven't played much of the other stuff - truthfully hadn't even heard of that Zelda game!

omg why is there a game called Ethnic Cleansing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_Cleansing_(computer_game))

If I wouldn't end up on some FBI watch list or something for ordering it I'd get that game just for the absolutely guaranteed hilarity.

That game looks ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous!

wikipedia owns

take good games instead then another games will be good for next play

I still feel sorry for one of my mates because he bought superman 64.
And to think they've added Big Rigs to the list... YOU'RE WINNER!

There was a time when I was young and impressionable, a time when I might buy a game based soley on the box, a time when it was possible to sell me Superman 64.

I'm quite fortunate such a time is behind me.

you have to be into madden or NBA live to buy one of those retarded hero games like superman or x-man or matrix. Goldeneye, now there was a shooter series...

madden is the best man don't be dissing

I didn't like Goldeneye much. It is probably because I don't really like James Bond.

Goldeneye was pretty neat!

It did, whether coincidental or not, start of a tirade off generally good FPS's

I think Perfect Dark had the better one-player game, but I liked Goldeneye's multiplayer mode more.

Perfect Dark definately had better one-player gameplay, but I would also argue that it had a better multiplayer mode.

Perfect Dark definately had better one-player gameplay, but I would also argue that it had a better multiplayer mode.

The whole blurry thing when you got slapped was far too annoying. Goldeneye was better in it's simplicity imo.

lol. i've been LOOKING for this game for a long time. "revolution X"

i remember renting it years ago, and i kinda liked it. it was fun. rofl. but i completely forgot the name. i can't wait to d/l the rom. its hilarous! rofl.


lol i played shaq fu too. but i didn't care for it.

I loved revolution x. the one in the arcade, anyway. ;-;;

thank god Carmegeddon is in there. a truly dire game.

The whole blurry thing when you got slapped was far too annoying. Goldeneye was better in it's simplicity imo.

It's more realistic. And I've always played with one-hit kill mode or 10% life most of the time, so slappiness hardly ever effected me.