I read some threads about it and it seem to be difficult, since i don't want to transcode it to a Lossy format. They say that i'll loose seconds from the track with Foobar if i want to 'split' my single .flac. So does anyone have an idea how to 'split' without re-encode, quickly if possible ? I heard that MusicBee and CUETools was my best friends for that

yep use cuetools

I read some threads about it and it seem to be difficult, since i don't want to transcode it to a Lossy format. They say that i'll loose seconds from the track with Foobar if i want to 'split' my single .flac.

Who told you nonsense about loosing seconds using foobar? If you read here please show me thread.

Foobar or CUETools the same thing, both are safe.
You need only to load cue into foobar playlist (in some cases you must first open cue with notepad and change file extension from .wav to .flac) and choose your desired option in convert window.


Output format (lossless codec, I suppose you want flac again)
Destination (your desired path)
Output style (in your case convert each track to individual file )


CUETools has several advantages relative to foobar like


repair rip option
fix offset

........

but this tools is for experienced user only, not for beginners.

+1 CueTools

-100 for Medieval Cue Splitter. P.O.S. hasn't been updated since 2011.

Have some problems with Foobar playlists so i don't really link this solution. I'll give CueTools a try, is it that hard to be use by a nooby ?

just installed and try it, if you don't like it, you can always formatted the pc ;)

Last resort - burn the CD then rip it yourself!

CUETools is working well for me. Thanks :)

I have a question, could i rename my .cue file if i retag my .flac splitted tracks ?

I have a question, could i rename my .cue file if i retag my .flac splitted tracks ?

Yes.
If it all matches, it'll still function as a cue file.

You can create a cue file from scratch in a notepad if you know the structure and format.

+1 CueTools

Wait man!!! We have to be careful about this, given that appeared new scientific theory. (go HERE (Thread 211204)).
Maybe we are in wrong? Skelly right now working on proofs. At the beginning I wanted to call this 'Tip of the Day' but for accurate information our supreme-developer need serious mathematical apparatus I'm afraid we will wait some time.

Stay in touch

Aimp encoder makes it well