
The Judge (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack)
1. Phantom Witness
2. Mercury Glass
3. Bag of Tricks
4. St. Francis
5. Indiana
6. Samantha
7. Wooden Nickel
8. The Judge
9. Reward for Dog
10. Blood Evidence
11. Shelby Rd.
12. Never on Pavement
13. Light a Match
14. Hope Stevens
15. Diamond Collapsible
16. Carla�s Father
17. Ten Speed
18. Old Room
19. Night Fit (Velvet Box)
20. Twenty Degree Bend
21. Watch and Learn
22. Tire and Rim
23. Aye of Knute
24. Missing Time
25. Trophies
26. I Choose You
27. Wabash River Float
Music by: Thomas Newman
MP3-320KBPS & FLAC, 47 Minutes.
Enjoy.
MP3
https://mega.co.nz/#!j5xxGI7L!m9XTt2pmDHHma0XQoyJCqzEmxc7XRB5u5GWTjmQ 1Z-g
FLAC
https://mega.co.nz/#!6lgGxCQQ!7CF9LnMVuays1nDEPFQisI4lZaBOYcZyqOTpqVm Bhf0
And another Oscar ‘NEWMAN” nominee this round, what you think?
* KUDOS to Mathilias for the digital lossless upgrade.
Many thanks.

The Judge (2014) Soundtrack Score
Composed by: Thomas Newman
Link 320kbps: Judge.zip (109,40 MB) – uploaded.net (http://uploaded.net/file/cextckdf)
Tracklist:
1. Phantom Witness (01:50)
2. Mercury Glass (01:52)
3. Bag of Tricks (01:03)
4. St. Francis (01:31)
5. Indiana (02:14)
6. Samantha (01:11)
7. Wooden Nickel (01:50)
8. The Judge (01:16)
9. Reward for Dog (01:03)
10. Blood Evidence (00:37)
11. Shelby Rd. (01:54)
12. Never on Pavement (01:06)
13. Light a Match (02:46)
14. Hope Stevens (01:39)
15. Diamond Collapsible (01:30)
16. Carla’s Father (01:08)
17. Ten Speed (00:58)
18. Old Room (00:52)
19. Night Fit (Velvet Box) (01:31)
20. Twenty Degree Bend (02:38)
21. Watch and Learn (01:54)
22. Tire and Rim (00:40)
23. Aye of Knute (01:51)
24. Missing Time (05:05)
25. Trophies (01:07)
26. I Choose You (02:00)
27. Wabash River Float (04:19)
I appreciate direct download!!!
Thanks a lot for sharing this score, Goback!
That aside another fine soundtrack from one of my favorite contemporary composers.
I appreciate direct download!!!
Yeah so do the people that troll these halls and report open links.
Am I right in thinking that there will be no CD release of this soundtrack (and thus no lossless version)?
Where’d you hear about a CD?
———- Post added at 08:40 PM ———- Previous post was at 08:39 PM ———-
Thanks for this.
Am I right in thinking that there will be no CD release of this soundtrack (and thus no lossless version)?
If anything, we’ll get a CD-r..
Am I right in thinking that there will be no CD release of this soundtrack (and thus no lossless version)?
a digital release can be lossless too.
[B]Thomas Newman ~ The Judge (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack) [2014] (http://uptobox.com/zugnvele0s2e)
Password UPTOBOX —> MATHILIAS
Password WINRAR Archive’s File —> MATHILIAS
starting a new thread for FLAC could have been a good option 😉
by the way why Flac Uncompressed ?
starting a new thread for FLAC could have been a good option 😉
A topic has been created so I do not see the point of making a duplicate.
After those who are interested in by a FLAC know take the time to search.
Your idea is not bad but I admit that I have not had the urge to apply 😉
by the way why Flac Uncompressed ?
I use the same track for this exemple
1) FLAC Uncompressed
The file is bigger because uncompressed there is more impressive in terms of size against quality is comparable to that of the CD or WAV format.
2) FLAC Compressed (Lossless Level 8 [Highest])
People who offer the flac uses this technique without necessarily realizing that the files are highly compressed they give a hand with the conversion software used by both sides with WinRAR archive so badly configured early increases the compression ratio file (56% in my example) this is all that there is deception on quality with the only advantage that the files appear to be less demanding in terms of size, but the sound quality is sacrificed however.
I hope that answers your question 🙂
[B]Thomas Newman ~ The Judge (Original Motion Picture Soundtrack) [2014] (http://uptobox.com/zugnvele0s2e)
Password UPTOBOX —> MATHILIAS
Password WINRAR Archive’s File —> MATHILIAS
"Sorry, Uptobox.com is not available in your country"
———- Post added at 09:43 AM ———- Previous post was at 09:41 AM ———-
Here’s a MEGA mirror for the FLAC version. Added to the main post, too.
https://mega.co.nz/#!6lgGxCQQ!7CF9LnMVuays1nDEPFQisI4lZaBOYcZyqOTpqVm Bhf0
https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/judge-original-motion-picture/id927203132
Thanks 😉
No it isn’t. You largely misunderstand "lossless".
If there’s quality loss, you’re doing something wrong or using the wrong programs.
Go over to HydrogenAudio forums and start a debate on this.
Make sure you have quantifiable proof. They’ll eat you alive.
FLAC 1.3.0 is old now.
There’s 1.3.1 out.
If you’re getting incorrect results, you’re using outdated versions and doing thing unconventional on outdated hardware.
———- Post added at 08:24 PM ———- Previous post was at 08:08 PM ———-
You can bit-compare FLAC-8 compression to FLAC-0 compression and see the results would be the same.
Going beyond the standards of FLAC-8 (potentially FLAC-12 compresion) might break the "lossless" concept. I vaguely read something about it on the HA forums, but since I never intend to use compression levels beyond 8 (which are not widely supported by most hardware; portables, etc), I ignored the issues.
You can also do a double blind listening test between the two versions and guaranteed you won’t hear any differences at all.
FLAC with compression levels higher than 0 do not degrade quality.
It wouldn’t be a "lossless" codec if it did.
There are lossy/lossless-hybrid codecs like WavPack.
But this isn’t that.
FLAC compresses data that is not there or not needed.
Why we have variable bit rates throughout the stream.
Formats like WAV have a solid, constant bit rate. All those bits are not needed/used.
So when you compress to a lossless format, those useless bits are removed and you’re left with the effective bit rates.
FLAC has been in development for a long time.
Version 1.2.1 is from 2007 while versions 1.3.0 and 1.3.1 are very recent, thanks to Xiph.org taking over development.
They’re not going to screw around with the code so you save space and lose quality.
The only reason to not update to version 1.3.1 is:
1) the software bundle/package/front-end/GUI/All-In-One you are using doesn’t update THAT often (it’s their fault, and partially yours for not asking for updates)
2) you’re on an old dinosaur system that doesn’t support SSE2 instruction set
3) you’re still on Windows XP
All instances of the above slow down development and make things for developers and package maintainers.
They hate hearing people using outdated hardware and have to create multiple versions to support dinosaurs.
FLAC-8 vs. FLAC-0 really has no difference, except for file size.
Promo? But very nice. 🙂
Could anyone please re-upload?