https://mega.co.nz/#!DFYwTJ4I!nBr8R8OjWBXNmTGH47QMjyve-iFbxZHy-Abf2WNf1gY
just why would anyone do this these days?
just why would anyone do this these days?
It’s still better to have that than nothing ! It like asking FLAC without having a good sound system, you won’t be capable to tell the difference with higher MP3 quality !
Bottom line, something normal quality is still better than noting !
Bottom line, something normal quality is still better than noting !
But it’s not better than nothing since the disc here rearranged was just shared flac. So except for a reordering of tracks and some very minor changes we have this in pristine quality, which is the only reason I questioned it. If it were a bootleg set unobtainable elsewhere, then yes, better than nothing. That is how I feel about the samples and promos I put together from composer’s web-sites. If it only comes as 128, then that is all there is. If he only has the other sources at 128 then I guess he decided to maintain the bit rate across the board. And if he and others are happy with the sound, then of course he should be proud of it. But the source being shared flac does render this NOT better than nothing.