
Here are dropcanvas links (not my rip, but I did split the tracks, resampled to 96kHz, and encoded to flac level 8 in dbpoweramp (highest compressed quality)):
16bit 44.1kHz (http://dropcanvas.com/9s7k8)
96 kHz version reuploaded on mega:
Kitlist:
Roksan Xerxes .20 Turntable / Artemiz Tonearm / Shiraz Cartridge / Vertere Pulse-R Interconnects / Plinius Koru Phono Stage to Marantz DR-17 CD Recorder (Mobile Fidelity CD-R).
I will do Batman Begins eventually, but want to record at 24bit. Any high-end capture card recommendations?
Correct me if I’m wrong but if the rip wasn’t originally made with a 96kHz sample rate, what would resampling it accomplish?
I was under the impression that increasing the sample rate doesn’t change the quality of the tracks, like you wouldn’t take red-book audio and resample it to rates beyond the spec because it wouldn’t change anything.
Can you or someone else this upload to another server too?
Thanks in advance!
PS: Even if resampled from 44.1 kHz, the waveform looks different than the 44.1 kHz itself (I compared it in goldwave). I guess it would sound slightly different also if I turned back on 96kHz capability on my sound card (I had to turn audio to 48 kHz maximum because of CoD:BO2 – like CoD:WaW it has problems with higher samplerates).
Here is the new link, but be patient untill it finishes uploading (arround 12:00 CET (GMT+1)):
When it’s uploaded, I’ll put the link in the first post.
Wouldn’t it have been better to resample to double the source?
44.1 to 96 is not mathematically sound.
44.1 to 88.2 is. It’s also the common sample rate when people do vinyl rips because when converting to MP3 or other lossy codec, most will downsample to CD specs: 44.1KHz.
The rounding errors will be significantly less than doing uneven integers like 96\44.1 = 2.17687074829932…