
1. John F Kennedy
2. Life Before
3. Parade Prep
4. Secret Service
5. They Think He’s the Shooter
6. Trauma Room
7. Kiss Him Goodbye
8. I Forgive Your Sins
9. Developing the Tape
10. The Video
11. We Have a Heartbeat
12. Get Him on the Plane
13. Cemetery
14. Driving
15. Can You Develop It
16. Coffin
17. Get Him to the Hospital
18. It’s Happening Again
19. Funeral
20. Two Burials
21. Life Goes On
Download (http://adf.ly/WgaJD) – 320 kbps
😉
but i have no professional ears whatsoever.
May I kindly ask something from all future uploaders in general? First please understand that this is by no means a complaint, but rather asking for a favor. I understand that great many of you tend to transcode items you buy off iTunes to MP3 before you share them here for others to enjoy. Your files are usually in mp3, at 320k and in joint stereo. That you are willing to share these in the first place is, by all means, greatly appreciated and I understand that most people transcode the files to eliminate iTunes watermarks in the files. But as far as spectrum analysis show, the tools that some of you use for this process usually kills of a substantial range of frequencies in the transcoded files.This usually makes the new transcoded files no different than a 128-160ks even if they are in 320k and even if the source material is far superior. Now unless our kind uploaders are not conent to share high quality materials in the first place (which could be understandable, but I am sure is not the case) this defeats the purpose of 320ks, and the time the uploader spends on putting these on the web (I am sure is time-consumng and often frustrating task).
If possible, may I kindly propose that you cool people use iTunes’ own encoder to transcode the files to whatever bitrate you wish to share the files in? iTunes uses an industry standard encoder that preserves the best quality at a given bit-rate. (Of course if you down-encode it to 160k and then upencode the 160k files back to 320k the outcome won’t be any better!) Also can you please check that the new files are transcoded into stereo, and *not* joint stereo? These two small steps provide outputs very close to the source material, without itunes watermakrs, and saves those few of us who are very picky about quality (including yours truely) from having to hunt down lossless files only to produce the same iTunes store quality again.
Again, I am highly appreciatative of all your great uploads and I thank you for reading this post as a small request (which should only cose you a few mouse clicks) rather than a complaint. Many, many thanks in advance. 🙂
May I kindly ask something from all future uploaders in general? First please understand that this is by no means a complaint, but rather asking for a favor. I understand that great many of you tend to transcode items you buy off iTunes to MP3 before you share them here for others to enjoy. Your files are usually in mp3, at 320k and in joint stereo. That you are willing to share these in the first place is, by all means, greatly appreciated and I understand that most people transcode the files to eliminate iTunes watermarks in the files. But as far as spectrum analysis show, the tools that some of you use for this process usually kills of a substantial range of frequencies in the transcoded files.This usually makes the new transcoded files no different than a 128-160ks even if they are in 320k and even if the source material is far superior. Now unless our kind uploaders are not conent to share high quality materials in the first place (which could be understandable, but I am sure is not the case) this defeats the purpose of 320ks, and the time the uploader spends on putting these on the web (I am sure is time-consumng and often frustrating task).
If possible, may I kindly propose that you cool people use iTunes’ own encoder to transcode the files to whatever bitrate you wish to share the files in? iTunes uses an industry standard encoder that preserves the best quality at a given bit-rate. (Of course if you down-encode it to 160k and then upencode the 160k files back to 320k the outcome won’t be any better!) Also can you please check that the new files are transcoded into stereo, and *not* joint stereo? These two small steps provide outputs very close to the source material, without itunes watermakrs, and saves those few of us who are very picky about quality (including yours truely) from having to hunt down lossless files only to produce the same iTunes store quality again.
Again, I am highly appreciatative of all your great uploads and I thank you for reading this post as a small request (which should only cose you a few mouse clicks) rather than a complaint. Many, many thanks in advance. 🙂
No. These are the original files which I received from a friend. The source file is the same as the one I shared, I haven’t touched it. I never transcode things myself. But i’m not made of money so I can’t purchase everything and if I get it early that’s better than nothing, even if it’s a low bitrate, but honestly I can’t say this is in terrible quality, not to me else I would not have shared it if I didn’t think it was in listenable quality. But to some of you it is, then by all means purchase the score or wait for an upgrade. I won’t buy the score just because of that unless I really like it. But if people don’t want these new releases quickly, in transcoded quality, to at least have a listen of the whole score as a sample to see if it’s worth buying, I won’t be bothering you, i’ll just stop sharing this new stuff which I sometimes receive early, even weeks before the official release sometimes, then and only share the stuff I buy and know for sure isn’t transcoded media, although I don’t buy stuff as frequent as before nowadays so my sharing rate will decrease a lot. I thought it was better than nothing and that it would give a good picture of the score even though the quality isn’t amazing, I still think it’s fully listenable and ok however.
May I kindly ask something from all future uploaders in general? First please understand that this is by no means a complaint, but rather asking for a favor. I understand that great many of you tend to transcode items you buy off iTunes to MP3 before you share them here for others to enjoy. Your files are usually in mp3, at 320k and in joint stereo. That you are willing to share these in the first place is, by all means, greatly appreciated and I understand that most people transcode the files to eliminate iTunes watermarks in the files. But as far as spectrum analysis show, the tools that some of you use for this process usually kills of a substantial range of frequencies in the transcoded files.This usually makes the new transcoded files no different than a 128-160ks even if they are in 320k and even if the source material is far superior. Now unless our kind uploaders are not conent to share high quality materials in the first place (which could be understandable, but I am sure is not the case) this defeats the purpose of 320ks, and the time the uploader spends on putting these on the web (I am sure is time-consumng and often frustrating task).
If possible, may I kindly propose that you cool people use iTunes’ own encoder to transcode the files to whatever bitrate you wish to share the files in? iTunes uses an industry standard encoder that preserves the best quality at a given bit-rate. (Of course if you down-encode it to 160k and then upencode the 160k files back to 320k the outcome won’t be any better!) Also can you please check that the new files are transcoded into stereo, and *not* joint stereo? These two small steps provide outputs very close to the source material, without itunes watermakrs, and saves those few of us who are very picky about quality (including yours truely) from having to hunt down lossless files only to produce the same iTunes store quality again.
Again, I am highly appreciatative of all your great uploads and I thank you for reading this post as a small request (which should only cose you a few mouse clicks) rather than a complaint. Many, many thanks in advance. 🙂
buy the cd :)))))))
@Lockdown
Fair enough! 😉