
Phew! This morning I was shocked to find out that the soundtrack to ‘Jurassic Park’ had been re-released today; even better, it included four additional tracks with a combined runtime of roughly 12 minutes. Still missing are some small tidbits (2:40 min) which doesn???t hurt that much. Anyway, it became clear to me immediately that I had to do one of my Deluxe Editions to honor this soundtrack classic. I???ve now bought the soundtrack two times, I also own the DVDs to all the movies… and even one old VHS that I kept for sentimental reasons. I don???t know how much time and money I???ve spent on this franchise and I don???t care, it has been fun from the first minute I laid eyes on the novel.
Supposedly the soundtrack has been remastered – this is true, Patricia Sullivan indeed remastered it. Beside the obvious and nowadays common brickwall limiting she also reduced dynamics of this score… which turned out to be a good thing after all (I did not expect a sonic improvement but I was proven wrong). Compressing dynamics has helped the overall cohesiveness of the score. She also used some slight equalizing to tone down the aggressive treble of the original and added a bit deep bass. All of this helps to ‘warm up’ the score, to induce some life into something that formerly was a tad brittle. All in all, this lady did an incredible job and I???ve subsequently aimed to reproduce her remastering (I would be using the OST tracks however and would also add an infusion of what I like sonically). BUT: there are some obstacles with the new release. The aformentiontened additional pieces sound completely different to the rest; one reason is a different equalization, the other reason is completely absent reverberation! Yes, for the OST Shawn Murphy augmented the sound with loads of artifcial reverb. The new tracks sound extremely dry and dull as a result. But there???s more… the new tracks have been mixed differently… which is why I now understand why they have been placed at the end of the score: the obvious differences would completely destroy the listening experience.
So I ended up not only copying Pat Sullivans mastering (which was time-consuming on its own) but also adapting the sound from the OST for the new pieces – I did what I usually never do: I added reverb. Additionally I matched dynamics to fit the rest while also tweaking equalization so that it fits in. While I have not been completely successful the differences have been reduced considerably. In order for the score to be in chronological order I also had to take pieces apart… and Boy, this really wasn???t easy. In some cases I segued the new tracks (which had to be spliced as well) into old ones and in other cases I left those pieces alone. Know this: on some tracks it is plainly audible that I tricked a lot (‘Incident at Isla Nublar’ is the most prominent example), while it won???t sound well it???s the best I was able to do with the things given to me. Sorry for that. Another thing… this is not completely lossless, roughly 12 minutes have been taken from the new release while the rest comes from my own OST I bought 20 years ago. Why didn???t I use the new release? Because I don???t like to work with lossy stuff, what was worse was that two tracks (12 & 13) had dropouts so I had no other choice. Apart from the occasionally haphazard crossfading I???m very happy with the result.
Before I forget: I did not include the track ‘Theme from Jurassic Park’ – I would have placed it at the end of the CD anyway right after the ‘End Credits’ as a suite recorded especially for the album; but since both are very much alike and since I hate redundancy I erased that track. You don???t like that? Add it yourself 🙂
The cover is nothing special. I worked on this edition from this morning until an hour ago; I always liked the official cover so I used that and tweaked it only slightly to fit my needs. However, for those who do not like the old cover I also included a variation including matching back and inlay covers so that the comic book style can be completely avoided.
EDIT: Guys and Gals, read the text above before asking a lot of questions. Everything is explained there.
Tracklist:
1. Opening Titles 0:33
2. Incident at Isla Nublar & Encased Mosquito 3:31
3. Introducing John Hammond 1:02
4. Journey to the Island 8:53
5. Stalling around 2:34
6. Hatching Baby Raptor & History Lesson 3:26
7. Jurassic Park Gate & Goat Bait 4:26
8. An ailing Monster & A Storm is coming 3:52
9. Dennis steals the Embryos 5:01
10. The falling Car 3:07
11. The T-Rex Chase 1:35
12. A Tree for my Bed 2:11
13. Remembering Petticoat Lane & My Friend, the Brachiosaurus 4:24
14. Eggs in the Forest & Meet the Monster 5:30
15. High-Wire Stunts 4:08
16. Hungry Raptor 2:08
17. Into the Kitchen 2:49
18. T-Rex Rescue & Finale 7:40
19. End Credits 7:55
http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/9XHCGACD/RoamingTheEarth.part1.rar_links
http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/1OYKILGJ/RoamingTheEarth.part2.rar_links
Pass: NotExtinct
EDIT: I???ve added a revised coverset that also includes additional covers. (http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/0LNMQHNA/FancyDinos.rar_links)
Enjoy!!
Did you include the 4 bonus tracks in this?
There’s a vinyl of the soundtrack out there. A vinyl rip should do better for an edit.
http://www.discogs.com/John-Williams-Jurassic-Park/release/667203
you don’t have the movies on blu-ray? :confused:
but as long as its a good listening experience 🙂
Did you include the 4 bonus tracks in this?
There’s a vinyl of the soundtrack out there. A vinyl rip should do better for an edit.
http://www.discogs.com/John-Williams-Jurassic-Park/release/667203
you don’t have the movies on blu-ray? :confused:
Don???t know what you mean. I used the official CD from 1993 if it was what you meant.
And why should a vinyl rip be better for an edit? I don???t understand…
I???ve not yet bought the BluRay – but I most certainly will.
but as long as its a good listening experience 🙂
Wonmpi?? Huh?
but as long as its a good listening experience 🙂
What the what when now?/
Vinyl rips usually wield 24 bit depth, perfect for audio editing.
CD’s are 16 bit depth, standard. Ideal for final output.
Also vinyl usually have higher sample rates beyond 48kHz, more room to breathe for your edits.
Expanding 16 bit to 24 wouldn’t exactly be the same as a 24 bit mastering album.
But, tbh, I’m not sure how it all works since vinyl is analogue by nature.
I’m sure some here can elaborate more on the pre-destined 24 bit depth for vinyl-to-digital transfers.
3m2 Record Intro = OST Track 2 [0:00-0:48]
3m2 WOMPI Ending = OST Track 2 [3:13-end]
3m2 WOMPI Ending = OST 2 [3:13-end]
JURASSIC PARK (1993) ? Complete Cue List ??? JOHN WILLIAMS Fan Network ? JWFAN (http://www.jwfan.com/?p=3222)
Reel 3 Pt. 2 Record Intro and Wompi Ending: OST track 2 [0:00-0:48 and 3:13-end, respectively]. Williams recorded this intro and ending so they could turn The Dinosaurs into a standalone concert suite. Everything on the OST track from 0:49 to 3:12 is just the same take of The Dinosaursheard in track 4.
I still can’t understand any of it.
CD’s are 16 bit depth, standard. Ideal for final output.
Also vinyl usually have higher sample rates beyond 48kHz, more room to breathe for your edits.
Expanding 16 bit to 24 wouldn’t exactly be the same as a 24 bit mastering album.
But, tbh, I’m not sure how it all works since vinyl is analogue by nature.
I’m sure some here can elaborate more on the pre-destined 24 bit depth for vinyl-to-digital transfers.
Vinyl is one of the most overstated formats ever to ‘grace’ the market. The usable resolution is around 12 Bits / 32 kHz with most vinyls. Furthermore many recent vinyls have been derived from the same master used for the CD – which is 16/44.1 and at best 24/44.1. What???s worse is that even with a properly aligned stylus one still inadvertently encounters distortions, channel imbalances, tracking errors… and what not. It would not ever occur to me to disgrace a score like Jurassic Park by using an LP. Sorry if I???m very harsh right now… but vinyl is the worst that can happen to orchestral music IMO.
I myself always work in 32/176.4 and even if it???s only an upsample I use the very best resamplers and tools available to the market – and I use them wisely. You can be assured that I always take the highest care not to sound ‘digital’ (whatever that means) and to present an actual sonic improvement surpassing the original. Sometimes it???s not working, sure, but I???m getting better at it every day. And this release here IMO has been improved compared to the OST.
3m2 WOMPI Ending = OST 2 [3:13-end]
Errr… ok. Have not seen it. I should have looked into the Jurassic-Park-resurrected thread… maybe I could have gotten hold of clean intros and outros. What the heck… I???m happy with it 😉
Its not unreleased, its just not on this.
but it does not matter, as it breaks the flow of your listening (personally I would use it as an overture, perhaps even between Opening Titles, and Incident on Isla Nublar)
No, I???m not. I have several scores on vinyl and I???ve always found the CD to be superior. And if the CD doesn???t sound the way I would like it to I try to change it. I???m really sorry, but I don???t like vinyl at all. I recently bought the ‘Cloud Atlas’ vinyl (there???s one additional track on it) and I don???t look forward recording it…
Its not unreleased, its just not on this.
but it does not matter, as it breaks the flow of your listening (personally I would use it as an overture, perhaps even between Opening Titles, and Incident on Isla Nublar)
Ah, ok. I didn???t know that. Thank you for clearing this up.
http://24.media.tumblr.com/efbfcfb6310d54e092ffff481dfbffc5/tumblr_mhr3k3hbcz1ri1j60o1_400.gif
I’m off to give it a listen.
Once I transfer it to vinyl. :nedry:
It includes the four bonus tracks. All in chronological order, just have a look at the tracklist, most of the original (recording session)-titles have been retained.
Which extra track? You mean ‘Cloud Atlas’? When I have time… since vinyl is so fragile and everything depends on the proper setup this???ll take its time.
And I don???t know if you want to delete the official 20th anniversary… I guess, you???d have to compare which of the two you like better.
yeah, but there’s a lot of hullabaloo about it.
Douche brought up a lot of valid points over it.
The largest most fret over is using the right playback speed.
But I didn’t really know about the bit depth/sample rate issue with them.
I’ve only marginally skimmed through some forums for info but it always turns into a debate, the likes of the Loudness War.
Alright then, so I can disregard that version and just stick with yours? Sorry, being OCD is a pain in the ass
No, he used the retail CD for this.
Alright then, so I can disregard that version and just stick with yours? Sorry, being OCD is a pain in the ass
I would keep all versions available.
But that’s just me. :ashine:
Douche brought up a lot of valid points over it.
The largest most fret over is using the right playback speed.
But I didn’t really know about the bit depth/sample rate issue with them.
I’ve only marginally skimmed through some forums for info but it always turns into a debate, the likes of the Loudness War.
Truer words have never been spoken… and I???m not completely innocent either.
No. As Sparktank already wrote I used the original CD from 1993.
It???s in the archive.
All lies.
As Sonic already wrote…
this is not completely lossless, roughly 12 minutes have been taken from the new release while the rest comes from my own OST I bought 20 years ago
I used the official CD from 1993
Twice before I wrote it.
:smrt:
Honestly, I know both of you (Sparktank and SonicAdventure) and I know you are both good guys but seriously Sparktank what the hell. SonicAdventure knows a lot about audio technology and things so if he says a certain source isn’t up to his standards then he is not simply being douchy but has tried it and found that it did not live up to the hype.
Is there possibly a bootleg that I missed out on that includes the cues that are missing from this release? The 2:40 minutes worth of music.
Lockdown, I just posted the missing cues (and the source cue!) in the thread for the Twentieth Anniversary release (http://forums.ffshrine.org/f92/jurassic-park-20th-anniversary-130104-post2312115/#post2312115).
Honestly, I know both of you (Sparktank and SonicAdventure) and I know you are both good guys but seriously Sparktank what the hell. SonicAdventure knows a lot about audio technology and things so if he says a certain source isn’t up to his standards then he is not simply being douchy but has tried it and found that it did not live up to the hype.
Hey Sirusjr… it???s nice of you to do this but it isn???t necessary, really. I can take it like a good sport – and I have to accept different opinions than my own. It???s perfectly allright, really. But I thank you nonetheless 🙂
Any chance your next DE will be The Lost World?
08 3m3 Cartoon Demonstration
Thank you, ribonucleic. BTW I like your username, it’s creative and different
Any chance your next DE will be The Lost World?
No, simply because it hasn???t been released in any expanded form AND with pristine audio quality to my knowledge. But I???d certainly love to do it, I like that score too.
Mindboggling, isn???t it? Patricia Sullivan’s idea… and I was baffled as well that I was able to hear things I???ve never heard before. And I???ve listened to this score A LOT during those 20 years.
You know what? I pondered the idea to include something like that at the end. I???m sure I could have extracted the T-Rex’s roar from my DVD to include it somewhere. The second possibility would have been the roar from the Erich-Kunzel-album ‘The Great Fantasy Adventure Album’… but in the end I decided against it since the questioning conclusion to the score is better left alone.
Thank you so much for your Deluxe Edition!
Phew! This morning I was shocked to find out that the soundtrack to ‘Jurassic Park’ had been re-released today; even better, it included four additional tracks with a combined runtime of roughly 12 minutes. Still missing are some small tidbits (2:40 min) which doesn???t hurt that much. Anyway, it became clear to me immediately that I had to do one of my Deluxe Editions to honor this soundtrack classic. I???ve now bought the soundtrack two times, I also own the DVDs to all the movies… and even one old VHS that I kept for sentimental reasons. I don???t know how much time and money I???ve spent on this franchise and I don???t care, it has been fun from the first minute I laid eyes on the novel.
Supposedly the soundtrack has been remastered – this is true, Patricia Sullivan indeed remastered it. Beside the obvious and nowadays common brickwall limiting she also reduced dynamics of this score… which turned out to be a good thing after all (I did not expect a sonic improvement but I was proven wrong). Compressing dynamics has helped the overall cohesiveness of the score. She also used some slight equalizing to tone down the aggressive treble of the original and added a bit deep bass. All of this helps to ‘warm up’ the score, to induce some life into something that formerly was a tad brittle. All in all, this lady did an incredible job and I???ve subsequently aimed to reproduce her remastering (I would be using the OST tracks however and would also add an infusion of what I like sonically). BUT: there are some obstacles with the new release. The aformentiontened additional pieces sound completely different to the rest; one reason is a different equalization, the other reason is completely absent reverberation! Yes, for the OST Shawn Murphy augmented the sound with loads of artifcial reverb. The new tracks sound extremely dry and dull as a result. But there???s more… the new tracks have been mixed differently… which is why I now understand why they have been placed at the end of the score: the obvious differences would completely destroy the listening experience.
So I ended up not only copying Pat Sullivans mastering (which was time-consuming on its own) but also adapting the sound from the OST for the new pieces – I did what I usually never do: I added reverb. Additionally I matched dynamics to fit the rest while also tweaking equalization so that it fits in. While I have not been completely successful the differences have been reduced considerably. In order for the score to be in chronological order I also had to take pieces apart… and Boy, this really wasn???t easy. In some cases I segued the new tracks (which had to be spliced as well) into old ones and in other cases I left those pieces alone. Know this: on some tracks it is plainly audible that I tricked a lot (‘Incident at Isla Nublar’ is the most prominent example), while it won???t sound well it???s the best I was able to do with the things given to me. Sorry for that. Another thing… this is not completely lossless, roughly 12 minutes have been taken from the new release while the rest comes from my own OST I bought 20 years ago. Why didn???t I use the new release? Because I don???t like to work with lossy stuff, what was worse was that two tracks (12 & 13) had dropouts so I had no other choice. Apart from the occasionally haphazard crossfading I???m very happy with the result.
Before I forget: I did not include the track ‘Theme from Jurassic Park’ – I would have placed it at the end of the CD anyway right after the ‘End Credits’ as a suite recorded especially for the album; but since both are very much alike and since I hate redundancy I erased that track. You don???t like that? Add it yourself 🙂
The cover is nothing special. I worked on this edition from this morning until an hour ago; I always liked the official cover so I used that and tweaked it only slightly to fit my needs. However, for those who do not like the old cover I also included a variation including matching back and inlay covers so that the comic book style can be completely avoided.
EDIT: Guys and Gals, read the text above before asking a lot of questions. Everything is explained there.
Tracklist:
1. Opening Titles 0:33
2. Incident at Isla Nublar & Encased Mosquito 3:31
3. Introducing John Hammond 1:02
4. Journey to the Island 8:53
5. Stalling around 2:34
6. Hatching Baby Raptor & History Lesson 3:26
7. Jurassic Park Gate & Goat Bait 4:26
8. An ailing Monster & A Storm is coming 3:52
9. Dennis steals the Embryos 5:01
10. The falling Car 3:07
11. The T-Rex Chase 1:35
12. A Tree for my Bed 2:11
13. Remembering Petticoat Lane & My Friend, the Brachiosaurus 4:24
14. Eggs in the Forest & Meet the Monster 5:30
15. High-Wire Stunts 4:08
16. Hungry Raptor 2:08
17. Into the Kitchen 2:49
18. T-Rex Rescue & Finale 7:40
19. End Credits 7:55
http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/9XHCGACD/RoamingTheEarth.part1.rar_links
http://www.mirrorcreator.com/files/1OYKILGJ/RoamingTheEarth.part2.rar_links
Pass: NotExtinct
Enjoy!!
Some of these replies are cracking me. Some of thhe questions that are asked time and time again in this thread are a answered in the first post by sonic.
http://24.media.tumblr.com/efbfcfb6310d54e092ffff481dfbffc5/tumblr_mhr3k3hbcz1ri1j60o1_400.gif
I’m off to give it a listen.
Once I transfer it to vinyl. :nedry:
ahahahahahaha, i actually creased up on that post :loldata:
Much of "Into the Kitchen" doesn’t seem to be from that scene in the movie. Anyone know what scene that’s from, or was it unused?
i also couldnt resist adding the ‘Theme From Jurassic Park’ track. sorry 😛
Lockdown, I just posted the missing cues (and the source cue!) in the thread for the Twentieth Anniversary release (http://forums.ffshrine.org/f92/jurassic-park-20th-anniversary-130104-post2312115/#post2312115).
Are those the very same tracks included in the bootleg, I think it was called Jurassic Park: Resurrection, with bits of SFX?
I honestly don’t get why The Trouble With Dennis wasn’t included. It’s such a great cue. I’m actually surprised that the T-Rex Chase wasn’t included in the original CD, which I hadn’t listened to in nearly a decade prior to yesterday, after having acquired the bootleg mentioned above. The original OST presentation is so strange. I feel that having Journey to the Island, Welcome to Jurassic Park, and the End Credits was enough to satisfy our needs with the main JP theme, so Track 2 felt utterly pointless and took up space that could have been filled with the T-Rex Chase and The Trouble With Dennis.
Those are the same cue, so I would have removed End Credits, and replaced it with WTJP instead of droppig Theme From Jurassic Park, seeing how it has a new intro and ending, where EC only has a clean opening.
I did exactly that… almost. I dropped ‘Theme from Jurassic Park’ and replaced the three-minutes ‘End Credits’ with ‘Welcome to Jurassic Park’.
… I mean: you don’t want to get the good people fired, there aren’t so many. 😉
They would do good by her and consigning Intrada to handle physical copies.
The original film has a DTS soundtrack, and the music to the album matches that on the DTS film rip.
The blu ray has a new 7.1 track which matches the music to this iTunes release
BUT the iTunes release does NOT match the Album release when it comes to speed, which makes me think this sources from a newer transfer used to create the new mixes.
What would cause this discrepency seeing as the album/original DTS track should, in theory, be incapable of being the wrong pitch during playback.
According to a program I use, the iTunes release is .99741% too slow but doesnt seem to effect pitch. This speed issues becomes obvious in long tracks like "Journey to the Island." id normally think that these might be alternate takes but every chance i could compare misc stage noise I found it would be in both (except in the case of the last note of "Journey to the Island" which seems to be dofferent, or in one other track where they edited out the stage noise). I know you mentioned the whole low tone used for proper playback/transfer… do you think there was an error in the original recording and so this transfer was done slightly wrong?
… I mean: you don’t want to get the good people fired, there aren’t so many. 😉
Fair argument. Thing is, until Jurassic Park I regarded Patricia Sullivan as an engineer who can only achieve one thing: making everything louder with a brickwall limiter. I also only assume that it???s her, who knows if someone else performed the dynamic alterations when preparing the score for the 3D-remix.
The blu ray has a new 7.1 track which matches the music to this iTunes release
BUT the iTunes release does NOT match the Album release when it comes to speed, which makes me think this sources from a newer transfer used to create the new mixes.
What would cause this discrepency seeing as the album/original DTS track should, in theory, be incapable of being the wrong pitch during playback.
According to a program I use, the iTunes release is .99741% too slow but doesnt seem to effect pitch. This speed issues becomes obvious in long tracks like "Journey to the Island." id normally think that these might be alternate takes but every chance i could compare misc stage noise I found it would be in both (except in the case of the last note of "Journey to the Island" which seems to be dofferent, or in one other track where they edited out the stage noise). I know you mentioned the whole low tone used for proper playback/transfer… do you think there was an error in the original recording and so this transfer was done slightly wrong?
For one, I have not heard any speed discrepances between the old CD and the new iTunes release. I should know because in two cases I used the new release to augment my old CD. On the old CD ‘Dennis steals the Embryo’ crossfades into ‘A Tree for my Bed’ while on the new release they were seperated. So I took the new ending from ‘Dennis’ and replaced the last 5 to 10 seconds of the old CD release with it. The same for the beginning of ‘A Tree for my Bed’. In both cases pitch changes would have been very obvious – but I did not hear any.
What program do you use? How can it calculate pitch changes if it doesn???t have an idea about absolute pitch (no program has)? What is the reference for this program? Secondly, I observed the opposite: the new tracks are slightly shorter – but only because they have been faded out sooner.
In theory of course the old release could have contained an ‘error’. We can assume that Jurassic Park was recorded analogue (there are many hints which support this) so a new remaster would ideally have included a new digitization of that analogue master. As unreliable as analogue tape is could mean that using this tape with a differently aligned or set-up tape playback machine would yield a very slightly different overall speed. This is of course no ‘error’ (hence the hyphens) but just a difference of used hardware.
I will not talk about the movie itself… especially the PAL release did have a speed-up I???ve never heard before.
Is there a DE for The Lost World? Love it.
I disagree, actually. I would say it was fair had not the iTunes release already been posted. But since the album itself is fair game, I fail to see how this "fan edit" (forgive me, I know it is more than that) is going to hurt sales any further…
My dear lady, you ARE observant. That is exactly the reason, I won???t even consider a Deluxe Edition unless I???ve got something to add.
BTW, I???ve updated the covers a bit and also added three more:
I???m still not happy with the cover but I wanted to give more options to choose from. Get the new archive in the original post.
Perfectly allright, my edition really IS a fan edit only.
I always love your editions, and look forward to every single one.
Anywho, comparing Region 1 NTSC to the ALBUM, they always lined up exactly (or pretty darn close with a little wiggle room for error). But when they blu ray came out, I ripped the audio for the still missing tracks and never compared them. NOw that we have this iTunes release, I’ve compared ALL the tracks because I wanted to make sure we didn’t have alternate takes since it seems obvious to me that they went back to the original source masters and not the album masters to rebuild the edits (since so many details are changed it seems obvious).
Comparing them, I found that, like with long cues such as "Journey to the Island" they were pitched almost the same (or exactly the same hard to tell by ear) but as time progresses the iTunes tracks become longer bit by bit. I’ve compared stage noise so I KNOW these are the same takes but they are not lining up as they should.
I use a program that I’ve always used and kinda default to called MAGIX and it gives you the option to change the length of a file without changing the pitch (but you can also do both as a factor of each-other).
Anyway, it was in THIS option that once I moved it to 0.99741 that I found the music lined up as it should. Comparing it to the rips from the Blu Ray, I found that the blu ray rips lined up with the iTunes before changing the length, but that they did not fit against the original DVD releases.
This seems like a very small change but I’m always wondering what causes them… if its someone being sloppy, if it’s an error from years ago… or if you maybe recognize the amount as something that’s inherent in the technology change. I may have to see what the interval would be with pitch shift and if that ruins the pitch (it just might as they both sound the right pitch).
Any thoughts would be well appreciated.
For one, I have not heard any speed discrepances between the old CD and the new iTunes release. I should know because in two cases I used the new release to augment my old CD. On the old CD ‘Dennis steals the Embryo’ crossfades into ‘A Tree for my Bed’ while on the new release they were seperated. So I took the new ending from ‘Dennis’ and replaced the last 5 to 10 seconds of the old CD release with it. The same for the beginning of ‘A Tree for my Bed’. In both cases pitch changes would have been very obvious – but I did not hear any.
What program do you use? How can it calculate pitch changes if it doesn???t have an idea about absolute pitch (no program has)? What is the reference for this program? Secondly, I observed the opposite: the new tracks are slightly shorter – but only because they have been faded out sooner.
In theory of course the old release could have contained an ‘error’. We can assume that Jurassic Park was recorded analogue (there are many hints which support this) so a new remaster would ideally have included a new digitization of that analogue master. As unreliable as analogue tape is could mean that using this tape with a differently aligned or set-up tape playback machine would yield a very slightly different overall speed. This is of course no ‘error’ (hence the hyphens) but just a difference of used hardware.
I will not talk about the movie itself… especially the PAL release did have a speed-up I???ve never heard before.
you ok?
I???m with you there: Laura Dern Nude Photos Leaked Online – Mediamass (http://en.mediamass.net/people/laura-dern/nude-pics.html#slideshow)
:naughty:
They’re from an old bootleg I had, not sure if it was the same as the "Resurrection" edit you mention, but they do have SFX.
It was a 3 disc boot. One disc included the film version, another had the original version, and I believe the third was special stuff like sound effects and I think it had the trailer music, which is actually just a track from Backdraft. There was SFX, though the Trouble With Nedry track isn’t really affected by it as much. It was the one that posted here a while back.
So you can imagine its been through quite a few iterations since its early first attempt lol
So you can imagine its been through quite a few iterations since its early first attempt lol
Here’s the one I have. I believe it is the most up to date version.
The one you linked to has Blu ray rip in it replacing the DVD rips in the one before it. An earlier version didnt have synth mockups either so there have been a few very similar versions
Last I checked a Woman is not a "him". A woman is a "her"
How’d you check?
Complete as in having the extra 2.5 minutes? Or are you suggesting we just e-mail her and ask if a leak is on the way? Perhaps we could just as easily inquire with Lord Scorpranoes?
I know my way around a woman
excuse me?
it was not aim to you, only to dakofthedouchebag
They would do good by her and consigning Intrada to handle physical copies.
Wait, that’s not physically available ?… In that case I’d understand the lacks of efforts in mastering generally speaking, either designed for I-Pods or for people who burn cheap quality CD-Rs and lose dramaticaly great sonic qualities…
Oh lighten up or grow some thicker skin. It was a joke.
Some people, gee wiz…
They did "The Fury"……
He went around… lifting the audio engineer’s skirts…
**They were kilts** 🙁 :eye:
Ah, you???re that guy! Then you should have much, much more experience with the score and I???m sorry that I doubted you.
Anywho, comparing Region 1 NTSC to the ALBUM, they always lined up exactly (or pretty darn close with a little wiggle room for error)….. Comparing them, I found that, like with long cues such as "Journey to the Island" they were pitched almost the same (or exactly the same hard to tell by ear) but as time progresses the iTunes tracks become longer bit by bit. I’ve compared stage noise so I KNOW these are the same takes but they are not lining up as they should.
So you aligned them at the start of the track and they slowly drifted apart over the whole duration? That would indeed indicate that something is off. Either a pitch change or some dropped samples. But since you???re able to re-align by changing duration WITHOUT changing pitch it can only mean that some samples have been taken out. Assuming then that they did not digitize the album master anew this might indicate that either their post-processing chain made an error or the encoding employed by Apple.
This seems like a very small change but I’m always wondering what causes them… if its someone being sloppy, if it’s an error from years ago… or if you maybe recognize the amount as something that’s inherent in the technology change. I may have to see what the interval would be with pitch shift and if that ruins the pitch (it just might as they both sound the right pitch).
This is indeed a very small change – but noteworthy nonetheless. I assume that it isn???t sloppiness on someones’ part but simply an error that could have been avoided. Having said that… in case they digitized it anew and resampled it after to the CD samplerate of 44.1 the resampling engine they used will have introduced other differences. Samplerate converters, D/A converters or oversamplers have an inherent systemic effect called ‘samplerate drift’. It means that the samplerate drifts very, very, very slightly (the famous 0.00001% wow-and-flutter of digital systems caused by the almost perfectly stable crystal) which means that a piece of music recorded two times with the same converters on different occasions will produce results that are not 100% but 99.9999999% alike. This won???t ever be audible, we or measurment instruments are unable to detect it but it???s revealed once they are aligned and copied into each other with one of them having an inverted phase. Ideally this should produce… nothing, ideally it shouldn???t be anything there after copying those files into each other. But once both files have been treated to samplerate conversion, D/A/A/D conversion or whatever they will produce differences.
I???m going to have a look at the iTunes files and the CD files and compare them and will report back.

In order for the score to be in chronological order I also had to take pieces apart… and Boy, this really wasn???t easy. In some cases I segued the new tracks (which had to be spliced as well) into old ones and in other cases I left those pieces alone. Know this: on some tracks it is plainly audible that I tricked a lot (‘Incident at Isla Nublar’ is the most prominent example), while it won???t sound well it???s the best I was able to do with the things given to me[/SIZE]
Hey man, if there is something i’m capable of doing with tracks, it’s breaking them apart and putting them together in a totally unnoticeable manner that is true to the original. The trick is to use what the entire album has to offer, not the two or more tracks you try to connect. Somewhere in that album there is a clean halve second of the instrument and tonality you need.
If you still got your un-combined tracks and the source i am willing to give it a shot.
You guys are wonders.
BTW, Amazon will have JP for sale on April 9th. Perhaps they will have the glitched tracks fixed.
I have come across a Flac version of ‘Las Gaviotas’ by The Madacy Mariachi Band if anybody here is interested.
Maybe she’s a West African frog? They have the ability to change gender in a single sex environment….
As for the drift, that sounds about right. The pitch didnt seem wrong but I will try adjusting both to see if it ruins the pitch. I can say for sure that looking at the wav form and aligning the two in one spot will eventually, even within a minute or so, show the "drift." The thing I noticed was that the music on the Album matched the timing and pitch of the NTSC but not the Blu ray. The Blu ray matches the iTunes release. Knowing that they rebuilt the audio for the 7.1 and now for the 3D release, my thought is perhaps they digitized the music masters and rebuilt the audio in the mix from this new digital transfer. I can confirm they did alter the music as some micro edits in the DVD 5.1 do not exist in the Blu ray 7.1 so I know for a fact they reassbled the mix but it seems obvious now this new mix is from a new digital conversion.
This seems odd to me because the DTS would already have the digital information but perhaps that’s the only "digital" element they had to work with… None of the pieces had been digitized and so to rebuild the sound field they had to digitize all the elements to rebuild it.
Hope that kinda makes sense… And in an inteview Williams says they went back to the "sessions" to chose new tracks for the iTunes release and I can imagine, wanting to keep the sound more uniform they chose to take all the music from the sessions and rebuild the album edits.
I know of at least a few differences in the iTunes album/CD album that lead me to believe its from a new transfer and it would make sense they’d use the transfer used to make the new 7.1 since those elements would be readily available now.
Here’s to hoping the whole thing leaks though lol
You guys are wonders.
BTW, Amazon will have JP for sale on April 9th. Perhaps they will have the glitched tracks fixed.
I have come across a Flac version of ‘Las Gaviotas’ by The Madacy Mariachi Band if anybody here is interested.
You can’t really say "you guys" because i didn’t really bring much editing to this forum.
But if you’re interested go here, best read the description page first. In the file section you find the music. The mainpackage mostly concists of Jerry Goldsmith and Bruce Broughton edits. The music really brings new layers to Fallout 3, both in "dungeons" and in "battles"
other upload packages not only contain battle and dungeon music but also for running through the landscape or cities 🙂
ON THE EDGE OF YOUR NERVES – Fallout Music Conversion 2011 at Fallout 3 Nexus – Fallout 3 Mods and community (http://fallout3.nexusmods.com/mods/9814)
You can guess the source album/recordings from the track names.
DAM for instance is Damnation Alley. CPRN is Capricorn One.
And so on 🙂
About the edit you request, i would need to know which source you want it edited from (in FLAC please) and some explanation how you want it to sound.
If you still got your un-combined tracks and the source i am willing to give it a shot.
I???m sorry but I already deleted them. I know I should have kept them so that I could have attempted to use some parts from the DVD but I simply forgot…
BTW, I did exactly that for ‘Incident at Isla Nublar’: there is the last synth tone from ‘Dennis steals the Embryo’ at the end which then slowly fades into ‘The encased Mosquito’. I also "doubled" the end sequence of ‘Incident’ (sounds a bit odd). However, it still sounds odd.
This seems odd to me because the DTS would already have the digital information but perhaps that’s the only "digital" element they had to work with… None of the pieces had been digitized and so to rebuild the sound field they had to digitize all the elements to rebuild it.
If what you say is true then they went full throttle and digitized everything anew. That???s an elaborate way of doing things…
Hope that kinda makes sense… And in an inteview Williams says they went back to the "sessions" to chose new tracks for the iTunes release and I can imagine, wanting to keep the sound more uniform they chose to take all the music from the sessions and rebuild the album edits.
In my experience John Williams releases always (well, maybe not always but certainly 20 years ago) receive a specially prepared master exclusively made for the CD only. This special master was derived from the recording sessions and augmented with newly composed pieces when needed (John Williams always has not only the movie score but also the soundtrack albums in mind when composing). Those pieces were then cut, elongated or made shorter to form the suites we all know. Everything for the CD was treated differerent to the sessions themselves which were left alone. The material assembled for the CD album also received special audio treatment as the sessions lacked too much reverb to be a John-Williams-score; so Shawn Murphy added artificial reverb (or had a seperate track with actual recording venue reverberation) and also changed EQ (boosting treble to amplify the fantasy aspect). All of that is the reason why the new pieces sound different: they have different dynamics, different EQ, different staging and almost no reverb. So I???m fairly certain that they used the old, specially prepared album master digitizing it anew and subsequently remastering it; then they took several tracks from the ‘pure’ sessions, digitized them, turned them into suites and tacked them to the end without any other change.
All of this is also the reason why ‘Hook’ last year was a mixed bag. The album master was still existing but some of the sessions had been lost (that???s why ‘Neverending War’ had to be agumented by film stems). It also explains why newer or other additional tracks sounded decidedly different.
In both cases they should have paid the money for Shawn Murphy to repeat his album mastering for the new tracks as good as possible. But… the score market is small and so no money will be paid as most people won???t notice anyway.
I agree as I assume that you???re much, much better at cutting and re-editing scores together than me. The idea to use something from another piece of music for ‘Incident’ came to me very late in the process and I wish I???d gotten it sooner. But I really don???t like ‘repairing’ my releases… it???s either that I completely leave them alone or do them all over again. Needless to say that I prefer the first option 😉
I’ll have to reconfirm that though. I can say your right though about how the sessions are developed into a master for the release.
Yeah, at one point one needs to decide "this is a finished product". Would be different if we ourselves hadn’t an expiration date. Would be horrible in that regard to, because we would never ever finish anything. And to go back to that god/whatever comparision: We would probable still be in the making also …
P.S.: Thinking of it, i wouldn’t mind to get re-released after twenty years also 😀
P.S.S.: no you read that wrong I’m not a convict
… I’m not specialist of that score but I thought reading you I would post the version of an edit of that track, using the whole Polydor verion, all speed corrected, along with all the DCC missing parts. To be taken as a ‘mock up’. Besides a member here has observed the Polydor parts are not lossless unfortunately… Not so easy to tell where it cuts though, unless maybe paying close attention to the reverb and the ‘generous’ mixing of the Polydor version: Download 14 Truck Chase.flac from Sendspace.com – send big files the easy way (http://www.sendspace.com/file/4oy3gt)
No, you couldn???t have seen it as I???ve never shared the version I made for myself. The version shared here (I forgot by whom) was pretty thorough if I remember correctly, it just didn???t correct the EQ issues. But the corrections for ‘The Ultimate War’ were superior than mine so my version was definitely not needed.
I don???t believe in God or religion but who says that we aren???t still in the making? 😉
P.S.S.: no you read that wrong I’m not a convict
I wouldn???t mind if you were a convict. People need a chance to redeem themselves and if confinement is one way of doing it…
Ha, I???d like to know the parameters too. I???m in the dark there just like you… the reverb I added is just an approximation, nothing more. My choices were completely arbitrary and I???m afraid I cannot help you there.
Ah! Reverb. Such a science to me.
Now, maybe mention what software you use first…
Now, maybe mention what software you use first…
I use Audacity, but I also have Adobe Soundbooth (I don’t use the latter that much though).
They updated about 3 months ago.
It seems to have improved a lot over the years.
Being able to handle 5.1 audio is a real boner-worthy feature.
at [00:44] the upper-strings are in the right channel, while at 1:16 they’re back to the left channel and [2:57] they’re back to the right
Could someone upload the two new fixed tracks, please?
They are not needed for Sonic’s version since he used the original OST CD.
Yes, I???m waiting for it. Let???s see if I???m able to purchase it (again) or if they will cut me off like last time. I also wonder what the format will be, let???s hope for at least 24/48. In case it???s 16/44.1 I won???t augment my edition.
Yes, until last year I was able to buy there. But since I???m not living in the States I cannot do so anymore, the right holders have strictly forbidden anyone outside the US being able to purchase something there.
As it turns out I was able to buy it nonetheless… and it???s true 24/96, not an upsampling or resampling. This also confirms what I have been assuming for quite some time: Jurassic Park was recorded on analogue tape. I will do my whole edition again, since I can now work from true high definition files which should yield even better sound. This also presents the possibility of re-doing some crossfades I fucked up the first time. Yeah baby!!
true 24/96
I hope someone uploads the 192/24 sometime soon.
sales are only available to the USA.
sales are only available to the USA.
I already would have, but $18 is just a little too much. Especially after I stupidly bought the iTunes version.
That’s cheap!
That’s better than what I thought it would originally be. Somewhere closer to 30.
You need to get your priorities figured out then. 😉
:this: No exceptions.
This just sucks donkey balls…….and they wonder why Piracy exists 😉
Lookin forward to hearin it….. Yeah Baby 🙂
Why buy anything on iTunes….the quality just sucks ass….esp the marketing Gimmick Mastered for iTunes….it???s sounds Garbage…..actually why use iTunes at all….. 😉
Because I had an iTunes gift card that I wasn’t going to be using on anything else and I wanted to use my money to show Universal that expanded soundtracks are worth investing in. I was also under the impression that there wasn’t going to be a lossless release any time soon. I agree though, iTunes sucks and I will abandon it entirely within the next few years, whenever I decide to replace my iPhone with something else.
That’s cheap!
That’s better than what I thought it would originally be. Somewhere closer to 30.
You would be surprised how cheap high def has become. Jurassic Park is an exception though, on HDTracks many things are not true high definition (TDKR for example: just an upsample, a fake).
I have bought Jurassic Park now three times. First in 1993, then in 2013 (iTunes) and 2013 (HDTracks) – with me Piracy does NOT exist. Until the moment I share my edition again of course 🙂
I’ve heard a lot about the TDKR HDtracks release.
It’s unsettling and quite disheartening.
It really’s terrible when a market aims for high definition and the entire consumer community have to wait for some poor soul to invest in the music and make a statement whether or not it’s true high def or just fake.
They’re the real pirates.
Source (http://www.filmscoremonthly.com/board/posts.cfm?pageID=5&forumID=1&threadID=95266&archive=0).
The new digitization of the film including the films audio for the Blu Ray has the music transferred at this incorrect speed. The iTunes and HD release match this which makes me think the masteres were digitized at the wrong speed but it’s such a small (but significant) speed that as explained in another thread here, it could be a result of the crystal digitization of the masters.
The original film (and the DVD release) and the Album release match up. The Blu ray and the iTunes and HD release all match so that seems they are all the same source.
The .99741 % is based on the average drift too. Some were slightly more or less but generally it was all that.
It does not seem to effect pitch however.
The only issue this presents is trying to match it to the album is difficult
The new digitization of the film including the films audio for the Blu Ray has the music transferred at this incorrect speed. The iTunes and HD release match this which makes me think the masteres were digitized at the wrong speed but it’s such a small (but significant) speed that as explained in another thread here, it could be a result of the crystal digitization of the masters.
The original film (and the DVD release) and the Album release match up. The Blu ray and the iTunes and HD release all match so that seems they are all the same source.
The .99741 % is based on the average drift too. Some were slightly more or less but generally it was all that.
It does not seem to effect pitch however.
The only issue this presents is trying to match it to the album is difficult
Interesting. I just finished downloading a full blu-ray copy of the movie.
Haven’t had the chance to watch/listen to it yet.
I think my DVD got stolen (along with many other DVD’s). I don’t have any of them anymore, save 3. 🙁 Why 3?? They knew what they were stealing.
So I can’t compare.
FOR SCIENCE!
:smrt:
wut?
Yeah, I think it???ll take a while. I usually don???t like to revisit something I did… and of course I???m working on something different right now.
Jurassic Park soundtrack wave images @ HD Tracks (http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f13-audiophile-downloads/jurassic-park-soundtrack-wave-images-%40-hd-tracks-15731/)
Jurassic Park soundtrack wave images @ HD Tracks (http://www.computeraudiophile.com/f13-audiophile-downloads/jurassic-park-soundtrack-wave-images-%40-hd-tracks-15731/)
Very interesting that even though I don’t own a copy of the score, just the trilogy on blu-ray and that’s enough for me!
Thank you! I would have buy it myself if HDTracks let me… The country restrictions sucks! 🙁
I edit scores myself – I did the Indiana Jones definitive editions in 2007-2011 if you came across them when demonoid was around. You did one hell of a job on this; your passion and love for the score really shows in your work!! This was the last great score John Williams did – it was the last one that really took us to that ‘place’ we want to go with his music, and I thank you sir for finally presenting it properly 🙂
You matched everything up beautifully!
Much respect and gatitude 🙂
-D
A Proxyserver really helps, you should try it out sometimes.
Yes, there is some actual reverb on the previously unreleased tracks. The difference between old and new tracks is still baffling. You???re right though, the EQ is very different too. The album tracks have more brilliance, mids, less deep bass and more upper bass.
This was the last great score John Williams did – it was the last one that really took us to that ‘place’ we want to go with his music, and I thank you sir for finally presenting it properly 🙂
You matched everything up beautifully!
Much respect and gatitude 🙂
I like that you like it but I couldn???t disagree more regarding your statement that this is the last great JW score. To ignore the Star Wars prequel scores and the Harry Potter scores (Azkaban) is almost an insult, to me they are a part of the greatest scores ever written. I generally prefer what is commonly described as the "John Williams of the digital age" as that music is more complex, challenging and not so… I don???t know, ‘easy’.
The Get.it links still work. As usual lol. I guess it seems to be the great last man standing of hosting sites – for how long though?
Thanks again, SonicAdventure. I had the regular 2013 re-release and thought I could upgrade this great score!
The 20th Anniversary release is available in hi-res on HDTracks.
Probably one of the ads the site uses.
Sites that rely on ads for revenue, especially non-popular sites that we’ve never heard of like that one, have no control over the ads they get to use.
They get their ads from a central database, which will sometimes lead to malicious ads.
They can’t do anything about it unless they pay money, which no one is paying for their services (at least not enough to remove ads).
You probably also ended up clicking on an installer that those sites promote (which are not needed).
And probably clicked the wrong "download" button, which often leads to some video player that’s typically just adware.
If you got an adblock enabled, you should see less crap on that SolidFiles site.
And when you click the big green button for "download", it’s for their own downloader, which also probably has shareware/adware in it just gain revenue for your free services.
Instead, click the underlined text that says "Direct download link".
If you hover your mouse icon over it, it will show you the ".rar" in the status window at the bottom of your browser.
If you hover your mouse icon over the big green button (that’s misleading to their installer), it will show you something else entirely in the status window at the bottom of your browser.
That’s the same principle for all the mirrored sites, since they’re mostly free and not_popular and have to rely on ads because you won’t pay.
———- Post added at 02:03 PM ———- Previous post was at 02:02 PM ———-
Hmm. SolidFiles is actually pretty fast for a free site.
Going to check the Braveheart again…
And thank you, again, for the umpteenth tome, SonicAdventure. Your remasters are terrific. They are the way the albums should have sounded when they were released. Your work is hugely appreciated and you skill much envied. One can only wish you have access to a hidden stash of Billie Goldenberg. All best!
Thank you very much… but Jurassic Park really isn???t my best work.
Anyway, can I cuddle with you now? 🙂
Anyway SonicAdventure, if you ever get around to doing a Jurassic Park 2.0 (perhaps with the FLAC files for the new bits), I’ll be first in line!
Anyway SonicAdventure, if you ever get around to doing a Jurassic Park 2.0 (perhaps with the FLAC files for the new bits), I’ll be first in line!
A professional will produce better results than me – if he/she is paid enough money. And you certainly are not disrespectful when you call me a non-professional – it is the truth and I don???t mind the truth, in fact, I welcome it. I???m an amateur – and Jurassic Park is wonderful proof of that (forgive the cynicism)… I really don???t like what I did. Sound is OK, crossfades are not, they suck. At some point, I will do this Edition again using the files I bought at HDTracks.
Regards!!!
Then I hope you post a warning here about it! I’d like to hear it too!
I had really a big problem with the quiet parts and this is so much better! I am very surprised what you can hear now!
You are doing an awsome work.
In the wake of Jurassic World I just had to listen to the Jurassic Park Score again and your version is really better than the offical one.
Wish you a very nice christmas!
*waits impatiently*
Download Page – powered by sendspace | (http://www.sendspace.com/pro/vzd37j)
http://www.mediafire.com/file/82rh6hvv34o4eky/John%20Williams%20-%20Jurassic%20Park%20%2820th%20Anniversary%20Delux e%20Edition%29.zip
Credit goes to SonicAdventure for creating this awesome set.
http://www.mediafire.com/file/82rh6hvv34o4eky/John%20Williams%20-%20Jurassic%20Park%20%2820th%20Anniversary%20Delux e%20Edition%29.zip
Credit goes to SonicAdventure for creating this awesome set.
Thanks a lot, love… but the LLL set is way better. Really.