1. Prelude (02:07)
2. Pharaoh’s Procession (04:47)
3. Funeral Song Of Joy (01:33)
4. Vashtar (02:18)
5. The Building Of The Tomb (03:50)
6. Pharaoh’s Grief (01:11)
7. The Labyrinth (02:31)
8. The Sealing Of The Tomb (02:18)
9. Finale (01:57)
TRACKS 1-9: Land Of The Pharaohs (1955) / composed by Dimitri Tiomkin
10. Prelude (Ballad Part 1) (04:02)
11. Lynch Mob (Ballad Parts 2 And 3) (05:30)
12. Gun Battle (05:10)
13. Finale (Ballad Part 4) (01:25)
TRACKS 10-13: Gunfight At The O.K. Corral (1957) / composed by Dimitri Tiomkin
14. Prelude And Take-Off (03:07)
15. Safe Landing (04:19)
TRACKS 14-15: The High And The Mighty (1954) / composed by Dimitri Tiomkin
16. Prologue And Hunza Valley (07:39)
17. Come Ye Discontented (04:11)
18. Killer Mountain (07:07)
19. Shalimar (04:51)
20. Kashmir (04:18)
21. Epilogue (03:30)
TRACKS 16-21: Search For Paradise (1957) / composed by Dimitri Tiomkin
Elmer Bernstein,Royal Philharmonic Orchestra and Chorus
Wavpack
I don’t have it any more,sorry
Alistair
"I will give you a lossless (wavpack) link if you give me your
"SHOSTAKOVICH: The Young Guard / Zoya (Belorussian Radio/TV Symphony, Delos)
Symphonic Suite "Air Power" (Norman Dello Joio) – Holocaust (Morton Gould) " in FLAC "
LAME! LAME! LAME!
I will never give my links to someone who don’t want to share theirs
Your behaviour is LAME-O.
😀
Please send me the link! Thank you!
Dan
Your behaviour is LAME-O.always a class act in condescension no matter where you go.
It is not lame for you to make a succession of patronising threads, dangling albums in front of people and demanding gratitude (thanks are meaningless if they are obtained through coercion) and filling them with condescending instructions… and it is not lame for you to insult the gentleman above for proposing said trade. Why would you respond any way other than 1) "I’m sorry, I’m not prepared to do that." or 2) "Yes, of course."
Wimpel, you’ve posted some wonderful things. Your musical taste is impeccable, and this forum is a better place for your musical and cultural insights. I respect you a great deal. But I cannot respect the attitude with which you conduct your sharing. I do not like this new style of thread that we’re seeing more of. You know the one. The thread where you get told what you may or may not say, think, or do. The thread where you get a moral lecture. The thread that you are required to play the ego-boost game with the original poster before getting the music.
I understand that it is infuriating when a thousand people download and only one says thanks. Forcing people to say thank you before they get the download really achieves nothing but a shallow ego boost; when I upload something freely (with no conditions attached, time limitations, etc) and it receives a thousand downloads and one "thank you" – it’s that one "thank you" that made it worthwhile.
One unsolicited "thanks" is worth infinitely more than 1,000 "thanks" you could only get through a bribe.
I always say thank you if I download something. It’s because I’m grateful for the poster’s efforts. I try to write something meaningful and unique, rather than just the typical dross you get on here "thanks upload", "thanx", etc – so that the poster knows I am genuinely interested and genuinely grateful – not merely somebody who will download everything going just because it’s free. This sort of thread is less about sharing, and more about the original poster judging the forum members; I do not like being judged harshly because of the poor behaviour of my peers. Demanding gratitude before providing the goods is saying "I think you’re all a bunch of ungrateful bastards and the only way to make you grateful is to manipulate you into it" – which may well be true… but I object on principle.
I have made uploads in the past; rare things, expensive things, wonderful things. I have never restricted my uploads, or made semi-confrontational, passive-aggressive threads in which to circulate them. I share to share. Not to get told how great I am. Yes, it annoys me when I see that fifty thousand people have downloaded my whatever-it-is and only three people bothered to say thanks… but looking at it from a more positive perspective, those people were sufficiently moved by your generosity and by the quality of your post to go out of their way to personally thank you for it. You didn’t have to buy their gratitude or trade it for downloads. You did a good deed, and human nature rewarded it with another good deed.
Some people will be miserable bastards and won’t show you gratitude – which is annoying but your conscience is clear… but some will be genuinely touched by your act of selfless kindness.
Likewise, the "don’t ask for FLAC" – I do not make a habit of uploading FLAC, and I get fed up with people who are never pleased with what they’re given – who fail to realise that when something is free they have no reason to gripe. But there’s a big difference between random transients demanding FLAC just "because" of every single album ever made, and a genuine person who is really enjoying an album (and is often unable to obtain it any other way) who is capable of asking in a friendly and courteous manner.
There are some albums out there for which I would cut off my testicles in exchange for a physical copy. Those albums – those life affirming, rare, wonderful masterpieces… those things that simply cannot be had by any legitimate means, except by bursts of sheer luck at auction sites or in dusty corners of second hand stores… why not ask for FLAC?
Personally, I would not recommend the procedure.
———- Post added at 05:59 AM ———- Previous post was at 05:58 AM ———-
Im **ok** as a woman.
I guess.
If I have to be…
:awsm:
Muchos sorry, answer forthcoming. 🙂
I would love to have this one
Cheers
Just something to think about.
Thanks!
Oh well. I know I’m late. 🙁
YOU will have to PM *me* for a link.
Would you send me a PM, please?
Thanks in advance.
It is not lame for you to make a succession of patronising threads, dangling albums in front of people and demanding gratitude (thanks are meaningless if they are obtained through coercion) and filling them with condescending instructions… and it is not lame for you to insult the gentleman above for proposing said trade. Why would you respond any way other than 1) "I’m sorry, I’m not prepared to do that." or 2) "Yes, of course."
Wimpel, you’ve posted some wonderful things. Your musical taste is impeccable, and this forum is a better place for your musical and cultural insights. I respect you a great deal. But I cannot respect the attitude with which you conduct your sharing. I do not like this new style of thread that we’re seeing more of. You know the one. The thread where you get told what you may or may not say, think, or do. The thread where you get a moral lecture. The thread that you are required to play the ego-boost game with the original poster before getting the music.
I understand that it is infuriating when a thousand people download and only one says thanks. Forcing people to say thank you before they get the download really achieves nothing but a shallow ego boost; when I upload something freely (with no conditions attached, time limitations, etc) and it receives a thousand downloads and one "thank you" – it’s that one "thank you" that made it worthwhile.
One unsolicited "thanks" is worth infinitely more than 1,000 "thanks" you could only get through a bribe.
I always say thank you if I download something. It’s because I’m grateful for the poster’s efforts. I try to write something meaningful and unique, rather than just the typical dross you get on here "thanks upload", "thanx", etc – so that the poster knows I am genuinely interested and genuinely grateful – not merely somebody who will download everything going just because it’s free. This sort of thread is less about sharing, and more about the original poster judging the forum members; I do not like being judged harshly because of the poor behaviour of my peers. Demanding gratitude before providing the goods is saying "I think you’re all a bunch of ungrateful bastards and the only way to make you grateful is to manipulate you into it" – which may well be true… but I object on principle.
I have made uploads in the past; rare things, expensive things, wonderful things. I have never restricted my uploads, or made semi-confrontational, passive-aggressive threads in which to circulate them. I share to share. Not to get told how great I am. Yes, it annoys me when I see that fifty thousand people have downloaded my whatever-it-is and only three people bothered to say thanks… but looking at it from a more positive perspective, those people were sufficiently moved by your generosity and by the quality of your post to go out of their way to personally thank you for it. You didn’t have to buy their gratitude or trade it for downloads. You did a good deed, and human nature rewarded it with another good deed.
Some people will be miserable bastards and won’t show you gratitude – which is annoying but your conscience is clear… but some will be genuinely touched by your act of selfless kindness.
Likewise, the "don’t ask for FLAC" – I do not make a habit of uploading FLAC, and I get fed up with people who are never pleased with what they’re given – who fail to realise that when something is free they have no reason to gripe. But there’s a big difference between random transients demanding FLAC just "because" of every single album ever made, and a genuine person who is really enjoying an album (and is often unable to obtain it any other way) who is capable of asking in a friendly and courteous manner.
There are some albums out there for which I would cut off my testicles in exchange for a physical copy. Those albums – those life affirming, rare, wonderful masterpieces… those things that simply cannot be had by any legitimate means, except by bursts of sheer luck at auction sites or in dusty corners of second hand stores… why not ask for FLAC?
Bravo!