
Title:North To Alaska
Artist:Lionel Newman
Year:1960
Label:Intrada Special Collection Vol.168
Format:MP3
Bit Rate:320Kbps
Size:62MB
Tracks:10
Track Listing:
1. North To Alaska 2:49
2. Go North 1:47
3. Angels Theme 3:20
4. Scenic View 2:11
5. Plie D’Amour 1:19
6. Baked Alaska 1:48
7. Love In The Air 2:48
8. Northern Lights 1:46
9. If You Knew 1:27
10. End Title 2:13
PM For Link
Intrada Special Collection Vol.168 is a 2 Soundtrack release which includes Two Flags West (1950) & North To Alaska (1960).
**Please note that fellow member tri2061990 has posted this set in FLAC as well.**
But why is the theme song mono?
Never mind. Here’s the stereo version:
MEGAUPLOAD – The leading online storage and file delivery service (http://www.megaupload.com/?d=Z5M3DYHV)
Oh, it’s mono for sure. But someone has tried to "enhance" it.
It might be that Columbia Records (or rather Sony today) sits on the original stereo mix and won’t let Intrada use it. But I’m just guessing here.
I’m not pissed at you, my friend. You’re not the only one in this thread.
About the stereo mix; It’s a typical pop music stereo-mix from the early sixties. You might call it the "Elvis Presley school" of stereo-mixes. The rhythm track on one side, the choir (The Jordanaires with Elvis) and the soloist in the middle. And these mixes were practically unuseable on movie soundtracks. Instead they took the mono-mix and added various echo-effects and other "enhancements" to them. Just to simulate a stereo effect.
Another example of the same is Elvis Presley’s Flaming Star. RCA:s stereo-mix is rhytm track on the left, The Jordanaires on the right and Elvis in the middle. The same way most of his recordings were mixed, even into the seventies. But the version during the movie’s main title is an "enhanced" mono version.
That was exactly what I was thinking when I listened to this, see I have a complete Elvis Presley movie compilation and that’s exactly what they did with the sound and I have to admit like on Fun In Acapulco and G.I. Blues as example the sound is quite good.
Yes and if that is how they are going to mix the stereo, I’ll stick with mono 🙂 I do appreciatie that Matewan posted an alternate version in Stereo though. It’s not your fault if it is not what we modernly consider stereo.
I gave you a choice and you complained. That pisses me off. If I’m given the opportunity to choose, I appreciate it. I didn’t find any kind of appreciation in your first posting.
If a genuine stereo recording exists, I think it’s historically interesting. Not necessarily better sounding than mono, but still interesting. Getting the opportunity to choose is what I always search for. So, if I get a chance to give someone the same opportunity, I do. Take it or leave it. When you complain over that, you’ve crossed the line as far as I’m concerned.
But I also dislike any kind of tampering with a recording. The Main Title song on this record is not the optimal one when it comes to sound quality. It’s consistent with the movie soundtrack. And that’s what the album is supposed to be. But it’s still tampered with. So, when you claim that the sound quality is good for it’s time, you obviously don’t know what you’re talking about. And alternate versions are common on score albums. That’s the reason I found it peculiar that the 45rpm version was not included. Sound quality has nothing to do with that.
A final note: If you really want to hear a great recording “for it’s time”, I recommend “Belafonte at Carnegie Hall”. Recorded live in April 1959 and released in October the same year. It is, to this day, one of the best stereo recordings – ever. Not only that. Post mixing was virtually nonexistent. And the general sound quality is excellent. (Unfortunately, BMG have “remastered” the original recording for their CD release in the US. And that’s not all. They also cut one third of the original Double LP. In short, they ruined it. However, BMG in Germany has released the original and complete concert master. And it’s absolutely fantastic.)
I also thought it was important to voice that to me mono is great as well if that is what we are given because I’ve seen so many people on other forums who seem dead set on rejecting any recording that is in mono as if it is unlistenable trash when there is a huge range of sound quality we can see from mono releases from the archival sound of something from Chelsea Rialto Studios to the beautiful mono sound of The Spiral Road.
No. "PM For Link" means you have to send Wildwood a PM, and not post a request here.