Its not that I’m all that excited about it or anything but Simon Pegg is going to play scotty. WTF?
Yeah, and John Cho as Sulu? Honestly the whole casting seems like a comedy casting to me. xD
Star Trek XI: Boldly Go Where No One Has Lol’d Before
Star Trek XI: BGWNOHLB for short.
My thoughts exactly, however I will see it because I am a trekkie. It doesnt mean I am going to like it though 😛
It really a big task to fill the shoes of William Shatner, James Doohan and
DeForrest Kelley with other actors – which will be accepted by the audience.
I can’t await to see the final picture.
Chris Pine is playing Kirk.
tainted himself?! he’s a comedy actor he’s supposed to be in comedy roles. i reckon he’ll actually be really good in star trek as he’s got some amount of talent.
To milk some more cash out of it.
I haven’t seen them all, but the ones I’ve seen have been at least watchable.
From what I can see this new film will probably be one of the best films yet.
However I don’t think that it will outshine The Undiscovered Country & First Contact.
In my eyes those were the best two films with The Wrath of Khan & Nemesis sharing a spot for 3rd on my list.
From what I can interpolate from reading a recent interview with LeVar Burton (Geordi La Forge: TNG) he said that he would not be hesitant in doing one more Trek film based in the TNG era, but another interview with Brent Spiner (Data: TNG) has him saying that there is a possibility of the TNG era being over.
Although there could have been a far better choice for a movie setting, than before TOS (The Original Series), got underway.
I think that with such a wide range of diversified acting talent the film might just be successful enough to allow more interesting subject matter to be dealt with at a later date.
And what exactly do you mean by "deserve a good film", At last count the series has had 5 really good ones (The Undiscovered Country; First Contact; Nemesis; The Voyage Home & The Wrath of Khan), whilst The Search for Spock; The Final Frontier; Generations & Insurrection all are quite good also.
And THe motion picture wasn’t that bad either.
But on topic, Star Trek has been very hit and miss for me over the years. I have boundless love for some of the shows and movies, but would be perfectly happy if others would disappear forever. This movie looks like it’s probably going to fall into the latter category. There’s just no point to revisiting ancient history when they could get away with doing something neat like making one-shot Star Trek movies, each with a new ship and crew. Why should I get excited about boldly going where the source material didn’t quite go due to the technical limitations of its time?
But on topic, Star Trek has been very hit and miss for me over the years. I have boundless love for some of the shows and movies, but would be perfectly happy if others would disappear forever. This movie looks like it’s probably going to fall into the latter category. There’s just no point to revisiting ancient history when they could get away with doing something neat like making one-shot Star Trek movies, each with a new ship and crew. Why should I get excited about boldly going where the source material didn’t quite go due to the technical limitations of its time?
I only thought that Final frontier was good because of the subject matter, Albeit, Bill could have directed alot of the film with much more care and consideration, but it was a film taken in a direction that so few Star Trek episodes had touched upon and that is the realm of religious metaphysics.
Nemesis was good, because of the sense of resolution towards the whole Romulan issue, you could finally start to see the walls being torn down between the Romulans and the Federation (not that the Dominion War was anything concrete) that and you saw Data at his best.
Regarding the new film, I hope it does do well, it might secure further movies in the future and even more, with head DS9 writer Bryan Fuller, hinting at championing a new series on Television.
Enterprise flopped because it was designed poorly and incorrectly, it tried to combine the themes of DS9 and TOS in one series which is impossible in that the two are practically polar opposites. That and it was also much like James Doohan thought of early TNG, in that it was just kids playing with their parents toys.
From 1987-88 – 2004-05 Star Trek graced our Television screens and attempted in its heart of hearts to involve us and allow us to individually experience all of its nuances with out fear of rejection, but when Enterprise left our screens in 2005, a certain aspect was also lost, and there was a big gaping hole in the TV universe. TV needs Star Trek as do Movies Theaters worldwide. 2009 is, to quote Vince McMahon at Wrestlemania XX (Sunday March 14th 2004) for those of us keeping score, "Where it all begins again."