Beneath this tin skyline I write to you broken but not defeated (Message in a bottle style).
The machines enjoy the power they have over the numb.
The computer tells me all the data I need to run the perfect life program.
The machines chant slogans of promotions and company advancement together in one emotionless drone.
The slaves tap at the keypads in sync to the beat of the drum.
The cameras follow and log your every movement.
A rage against this cooperate machine is futile.
The machines, they run your home,
You eat their slogans and you embody their mottos.
Work, eat and sleep to the beat of the drum, the robotic pied piper.
We need to be liberated!
I call for a revolution.
In the wake of the digital age we are being turned into the artificial intelligence.
We only know what they teach us, only what they tell us, only what they sell us, only what we buy.
The time has come for a new chapter.
The time has come to learn for ourselves.
Your technologically deterministic bullshit is what makes your poetry so painfully bad. For once, someone showed good structure marred by horrible ideas. How is this at all relevant to what you said it was? A poem about work? What work? Do you work in a factory? Are you being put out of the job by a robotic arm? Or maybe you’re just hoping Keanu Reeves is going to pop through the window and kick some mechanic ass?
I wish One Dreamer’s Path would come back. Topics full of "REMOVED" were better than this.
I posted a while back when I could be bothered to, but stopped when this forum took a downward spiral. I’ve also worked soulless deskjobs. You write this as if computers are controlling you, though, and that’s not even near what they do. They’re tools, and if they’re controlling you, then you’ve got problems!
I don’t live at home with my parents. I wish I did, it was easier back then. I’m getting an education at the moment. Did you get one? Or did you go straight into the desk job you claim now controls you. The way your poem is written suggests that the computers control us, not the boss, so essentially all your goddamn self righteous ethics are lost.
Why not in the topic about the poetry?
Everything you say in that poem is blaming computers for controlling people, when, truly, it’s people doing that. You’ve just written it so it’s all based upon technologically deterministic thinking.
Also, it’s corporate, unless you’re being clever.
And really, it wasn’t understood due to how it was written, not due to any sort of failure on our parts.
The time has come to learn for ourselves.
Tell me, how are we meant to do this without using media. Consider that writing is also a medium. Listening is too. Communication is made through a selection of media.
If we’re not doing simple tasks, who is? It has to be done by somebody. Human manipulation and forced monotonous work was around far before any form of artificial intelligence was created. Would you prefer we didn’t make our coffees, that we had robots do them for us? Or maybe that we didn’t have to photocopy things, that a robot came and took our things to be photocopied, did it, and took it back to us?
Surely through that overmechanisation we’d become more machine than they were? Or is your example ill-thought out? Because these "routine jobs" are countless and are just the neccessary part of the job.
And how ironic it is you preach about being indoctrinated with a name like "neosavedtheworld," referring to the matrix, if I’m not wrong. That film ripped off about seven other stories, and used very weak hints of pop philosophy to make itself seem deep. By indoctrinating its fans with buzzwords and hints of this philosophy, fans were made to think that the film was great and pump more money into the countless bits of merchandise and dvd releases.
This drivel then convinced countless other media to copy it, from idiot game companies to other directors.
To top it off, they convinced millions that slow-mo was their idea.
An explanation of:
The poem is a satire on modern living…ie life and work. The machines (as they are referred to in the poem) are humans that have the behaviours of machines. The idea that we do these rountines as though we are programmed. The reference to the computer is as MrMonkeyMan pointed out Media. I am not anti media however I am against many forms of media that don’t tell both sides to a story offering no decision making on our part. The concept of slogans and advancements runs on the theme "10 cent raise work ten times faster" – Snapcase and whether these promotions are for our own gain or theirs. The concept of the beat of the drum in the way we all respond to certain things because we should and not because we want to. I’m also not stupid enough to think we can all do whatever we want when we want – the poem is a little overblown. The camera logging our every movement is pushing towards a possible look at the future. There are a lot more cameras around already then say ten years ago. When will it end? When does our privacy go out the window? Maybe it won’t.
The part in reference to a rage against the machine (not the band) is in turn attacking those that wish to down the system and seem to chant that as blindy as those who accept everything we see in the news as truth. Once again I hit home I’m not saying it is all lies either. We need be to fair on both sides to story. The final part leads towards a warning that if we don’t take action now then if things such as cameras are in our homes, our every movement logged then we won’t be able to be free. It is written like a rally cry and again is overblown. I am not suggesting we should smash media more make sure it isn’t used to manipulate and brainwash. Anyways this is a rough explanation of the themes. I hope it stops people from misunderstanding parts even if they don’t like the poem.
I am sure MrMonkeyMan will correct any spelling mistakes and errors in grammar since I can’t be bothered right now. I was hoping to lay this thread to rest but it seems it is going to haunt me for a long while. If you would like to discuss it further feel free to PM me.
p.s. this isn’t a go at you Prak as I said your criticisms were fair and just good sir!
Failure.
Satire –
A literary work in which human vice or folly is attacked through irony, derision, or wit.
I see none of those in there. It’s a very somber, melancholy piece. You’re not good at this.
<a href=http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=medium target=_blank>GJ.</a>
Honestly, MMM, the guy’s right. From the get go you were acting like an asshole for no reason. You have legitimate criticisms, but they are wasted when you present them like that.
I thought it was fairly obvious that the "machines" in the poem were being personified. Machines do control our lives in a way, just not intentionally, and that’s what I thought he was getting at.
If this many people misunderstood the poem, it’s obvious that it could use some work to make it more clear. But you’re not going to get that across if you act like a complete shithead. I can understand you completely blasting one of those poems in this forum that isn’t even a poem where the creator put no thought into it and wrote nothing of value, but you admitted yourself that he at least has some knowledge of how to write a poem, so what the hell are you shitting all over him for?