Phantasy Star- Just an FF Wannabe?



Blackjack

Blackjack

Online Blackjack in Canada for 2026: Safe Sites and Best Tables Online blackjack in Canada is one of the few ...
New

New

New Online Casino in Canada for 2026: Comparing Bonuses, Payouts and Games Choosing the best new online casino in Canada ...
Live

Live

Live Casino Online in Canada 2026 Playing at a live casino online in Canada in 2026 means you'll see a ...
Mobile

Mobile

Best Mobile Casino in Canada 2026: Top Sites, Apps and Safety A mobile casino in Canada is an online platform ...
Prepaid Card

Prepaid Card

Best Prepaid Card Casinos in Canada Prepaid card casino is a good option for Canadian players who want to control ...
Slots

Slots

Real Money Online Slots in Canada 2026 When choosing online slots for real money in Canada, two things matter: Is ...
No Deposit

No Deposit

Free Spins No Deposit Bonuses in Canada: Top Picks and Real Value Explained Free spins no deposit bonuses in Canada ...
Instant Withdrawal

Instant Withdrawal

Instant Withdrawal Casino Canada 2026: Fastest Payout Sites and Quick Payment Methods An instant withdrawal casino in Canada isn't one ...
Crypto

Crypto

Crypto Casinos in Canada 2026 Crypto casinos in Canada use digital currencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin for deposits and ...
Mystic Sapphyre
11-18-2004, 06:00 PM
I don’t know if you remember the late 80’s. Three RPGs clashed for dominion over the video gaming market- Final Fantasy, Dragon Warrior (I think that’s what it’s called), and Phantasy Star. Of the three, Phantasy Star was the most underrated. But PS had some good qualities of its own… then came PS3: Generations of Doom. The worst of the series. Now I don’t know about you, but do you think that Sega was just trying make PS be another Final Fantasy by releasing that game?

Raidenex
11-19-2004, 04:37 AM
Um… the business has always been about money. Enix came through with Dragon Warrior first (and kick-started the console RPG genre), Square came in with Final Fantasy and White Mage’d themselves out of bankruptcy, and Sega (not wanting to be outdone by the NES) created its own RPGs for the Mega Drive.

I’ve no doubt that Phantasy Star was created as a reaction to Final Fantasy (why do you think they called it ‘Phantasy’?), but from what I’ve heard, they are dcent games in their own right.


CRUNCH BAR
11-19-2004, 06:00 AM
they are good games, even the third one, fourth was the best.

Mystic Sapphyre
11-19-2004, 05:59 PM
They are pretty good but the third one had the most boring battle and mazes. I guess you could say PS3 was.. decent, at most.

MogKnight
11-19-2004, 07:15 PM
Well the thing with Phantasy Star was that it was entirely sci-fi based rather than epic like most of Final Fantasies. The stories were also "linked" in a way unlike FF. I wouldn’t say it’s a FF wannabe… they don’t even have the same battle system, type of story, nothing really close to each other than it being an RPG.

rezo
11-19-2004, 11:23 PM
Um… the business has always been about money. Enix came through with Dragon Warrior first (and kick-started the console RPG genre), Square came in with Final Fantasy and White Mage’d themselves out of bankruptcy, and Sega (not wanting to be outdone by the NES) created its own RPGs for the Mega Drive.

I’ve no doubt that Phantasy Star was created as a reaction to Final Fantasy (why do you think they called it ‘Phantasy’?), but from what I’ve heard, they are dcent games in their own right.

I’m pretty sure Phantasy Star came out before Final Fantasy. And the use of the word fantasy is pretty obvious. Most RPGs are in fantasy settings, as are the board games and such that came before their creation. If Final Fantasy had been called "The Crimson Tale" and Sega had come out with "The Red Story" a few months later, then I think you’d be on to something.


Scroll to Top