WAV

Discombobulate (2:25)
Hans Zimmer, Lorne Balfe

Is It Poison, Nanny? (2:53)
Lorne Balfe

I Never Woke Up In Handcuffs Before (1:44)
Hans Zimmer

My Mind Rebels At Stagnation (4:31)
Hans Zimmer, Lorne Balfe

Data, Data, Data (2:15)
Hans Zimmer

He's Killed The Dog Again (3:15)
Hans Zimmer, Lorne Balfe

Marital Sabotage (3:44)
Hans Zimmer

Not In Blood, But In Bond (2:13)
Hans Zimmer

Ah, Putrefaction (1:50)
Hans Zimmer, Lorne Balfe

Panic, Shear Bloody Panic (2:38)
Hans Zimmer, Lorne Balfe

Psychological Recovery... 6 Months (18:18)
Hans Zimmer, Lorne Balfe

Catatonic (6:44)
Hans Zimmer, Lorne Balfe


MEGAUPLOAD - The leading online storage and file delivery service (http://www.megaupload.com/?d=GF2RZV8G)

A 5.1 Original Soundtrack?! Unbelievable... but thanks nonetheless!

Interesting...gonna check this out. Thanks!

You're welcome my friends! Enjoy!

Atom is that you?

How'd you manage to encode mp3 at 1411kbps?

So which is it? mp3s or 1411 kbps WAVs?

Bit confusing, the lack of details but in any event this is a good upload.

T-Mann, there are many 5.1 surround film score albums such as "Star Trek: Nemesis", "The Lord of the Rings" trilogy, "Titanic", "A Beautiful Mind", "The Legend of Zorro", "Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows 1" and many others. Since that's how the music was recorded and designed to be listened to, I suggest if anyone has the means, snap up 5.1 film scores like this one whenever you can.

So which is it? mp3s or 1411 kbps WAVs?

Bit confusing, the lack of details but in any event this is a good upload.

T-Mann, there are many 5.1 surround film score albums such as "Star Trek: Nemesis", "The Lord of the Rings" trilogy, "Titanic", "A Beautiful Mind", "The Legend of Zorro", "Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows 1" and many others. Since that's how the music was recorded and designed to be listened to, I suggest if anyone has the means, snap up 5.1 film scores like this one whenever you can.

Guys, I'm not an expert with all this. I got it with the CD and realized how large each file was so I thought I'd share. I'm not familiar WAV. All I know is that this works in iTunes, which makes me happy.

Well if it's a WAV file in the truest sense, it's not an MP3.

@DAKoftheOTA

WAV is a lossless format. Don't care you did a nice upload & rip :).

I bought the CD and downloaded it for free.
It's not real 5.1.
It's just stereo encoded as Dolby Pro Logic.

I don't know what they were thinking when they made it and why they called it 5.1.
I've got other 5.1 WAVs that are actually WAV, so I know the difference.
When trying to split this into 6 separate mono wav files, it gives me errors and tells me it's not 5.1 but stereo only.
All software that I work with for multichannel audio shows that it's stereo.

In order to get the "5.1 surround sound" from this (or the feel of it), you need to burn to CD then playback in a Dolby Pro Logic receiver/amp.

I bought the CD and downloaded it for free.
It's not real 5.1.
It's just stereo encoded as Dolby Pro Logic.

I don't know what they were thinking when they made it and why they called it 5.1.
I've got other 5.1 WAVs that are actually WAV, so I know the difference.
When trying to split this into 6 separate mono wav files, it gives me errors and tells me it's not 5.1 but stereo only.
All software that I work with for multichannel audio shows that it's stereo.

In order to get the "5.1 surround sound" from this (or the feel of it), you need to burn to CD then playback in a Dolby Pro Logic receiver/amp.

That's how I got it. I bought the CD and on the inside were directions to go to Watertower's site and download it in 5.1. Like I said, I'm no expert when it comes to sound and which is better (all I know is FLAC is better and superior to MP3). I guess the reason I put MP3 in the thread title is because it can be played in iTunes, so maybe that's why it's really not 5.1?

I'm curious: if it's not 5.1, then why are these files so much larger than the MP3 version of the OST?
The regular one which I have in 256 VBR is 102.7 MB
This "5.1" version is 531.1 MB

Who are you DAK, really?

That's how I got it. I bought the CD and on the inside were directions to go to Watertower's site and download it in 5.1. Like I said, I'm no expert when it comes to sound and which is better (all I know is FLAC is better and superior to MP3). I guess the reason I put MP3 in the thread title is because it can be played in iTunes, so maybe that's why it's really not 5.1?

I'm curious: if it's not 5.1, then why are these files so much larger than the MP3 version of the OST?
The regular one which I have in 256 VBR is 102.7 MB
This "5.1" version is 531.1 MB

Well, WAV files are uncompressed. So the files will naturally be quite large. WAV is the full size, equal to what is occupying the CD.
FLAC can compress to about ~50% of the full size.
MP3 can compress down to about 75-80% of the full size.

I believe if these were actually 5.1 with discreet channels, the WAVs would be much larger.


Here's an example of a 5.1 wav file that is 2:30...

Duration : 2mn 30s
Bit rate mode : Constant
Bit rate : 6 912 Kbps
Channel(s) : 6 channels
Channel positions : Front: L C R, Side: L R, LFE
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 24 bits
Stream size : 124 MiB (100%)

same file, downmixed and saved as a stereo WAV file...

Duration : 2mn 30s
Bit rate : 2 304 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 24 bits
Stream size : 41.3 MiB (100%)


now in 5.1 FLAC...

Duration : 2mn 30s
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 3 306 Kbps
Channel(s) : 6 channels
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 24 bits
Stream size : 59.3 MiB (100%)
Writing library : libFLAC 1.2.1 (UTC 2007-09-17)


now in Stereo FLAC...


Duration : 2mn 30s
Bit rate mode : Variable
Bit rate : 1 269 Kbps
Channel(s) : 2 channels
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Bit depth : 24 bits
Stream size : 22.8 MiB (100%)
Writing library : libFLAC 1.2.1 (UTC 2007-09-17)



And there you have it. I wanted to write to Watertowers and ask if it was intentional and if they're going to upgrade it.
Still haven't done that.

...by the by, do you per chance happen to be also known as "Atom"? :confused:

WAV is basically a very very simplistic lossless audio format. Personally, I hate it, because nothing can be tagged (album, artist, album art, ect) when dealing with them. Personally, I try to avoid using it with music and stick to it only when I'm dealing with recordings of sound effects or voices. For that kind of stuff, it's perfect. But it really bothers me that there isn't a lossless audio format out there that's as versatile as lossy ones like MP3. Even with FLAC, only the most recent and most expensive audio editing software readily supports it, not to mention the fact that iTunes regurgitates it (unless you use Fluke which I've never been able to figure out) and most other media players like Windows Media Player need tons of plug-ins to even play the things, and even then, you can barely tag anything in your library.

Sorry. Explanation-turned-audiophiliac-rant over.

EDIT: ermmm nevermind, Sparktanks explanation was far better

Well actually, THIS ONE you can tag in iTunes. Everything except album artwork. I know how you love to have your album art, as do I. I'm very OCD when it comes to having my iTunes library organized. I have the art for everything.

---------- Post added at 07:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:58 PM ----------


Who are you DAK, really?

Someone.....

---------- Post added at 08:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:59 PM ----------




...by the by, do you per chance happen to be also known as "Atom"? :confused:

Perhaps....

Maybe also someone with a vgm and film score thing?

Hihi Atom!!!

I don't like WAVs, the tagging is a mess.
I'm not too big on album art or embedded pictures.
But I prefer FLAC.
WAVs are good for editing.

I use mostly Cowon's "JetAudio" for all my music needs. It likes a lot of audio formats, especially FLAC.

Can someone tell me a little bit more about this Atom guy? I've never heard of him before.

Posts random words in LIME green. Usually SIZE 10

WAV is basically a very very simplistic lossless audio format. Personally, I hate it, because nothing can be tagged (album, artist, album art, ect) when dealing with them. Personally, I try to avoid using it with music and stick to it only when I'm dealing with recordings of sound effects or voices. For that kind of stuff, it's perfect. But it really bothers me that there isn't a lossless audio format out there that's as versatile as lossy ones like MP3. Even with FLAC, only the most recent and most expensive audio editing software readily supports it, not to mention the fact that iTunes regurgitates it (unless you use Fluke which I've never been able to figure out) and most other media players like Windows Media Player need tons of plug-ins to even play the things, and even then, you can barely tag anything in your library.

Sorry. Explanation-turned-audiophiliac-rant over.

EDIT: ermmm nevermind, Sparktanks explanation was far better

LOLWUT.. how can you call yourself an audiophile... first statement out of the gate, "WAV is basically a very very simplistic lossless audio format." Its not lossless at all. Its uncompressed. Lossless means that its compressed but retains the same audio information as the original uncompressed source.

FLAC is well supported for playback. Its not MEANT to be edited at all. If you are working with audio, uncompressed high resolution WAV or AIFF is the standard. Lossless is not meant for any editing really.

If you are one of the people who uses iTunes for their music, XLD readily converts to apple lossless so pretty much theres no excuse to say that MP3 is more versitle than other formats.

Just my 2 cents haha.

LOLWUT.. how can you call yourself an audiophile... first statement out of the gate, "WAV is basically a very very simplistic lossless audio format." Its not lossless at all. Its uncompressed. Lossless means that its compressed but retains the same audio information as the original uncompressed source.

FLAC is well supported for playback. Its not MEANT to be edited at all. If you are working with audio, uncompressed high resolution WAV or AIFF is the standard. Lossless is not meant for any editing really.

If you are one of the people who uses iTunes for their music, XLD readily converts to apple lossless so pretty much theres no excuse to say that MP3 is more versitle than other formats.

Just my 2 cents haha.

*cries in nearest bathroom*

I kid. Looks like I am pretty misinformed, though. Thanks for calling me out on it. I wouldn't call myself an "audiophile", I just have a mental OCD disturbance in my brain dramatic enough where I need to see the audio peaks whenever I listen to something ^.^ I do some editing but not much. Actually that's pretty hypocritical because I went my entire life up until July thinking that WAV was lossy... so I suppose I have no room to talk, so I apologize. *goes back to "my-trial-of-Audition 5.5-expired-a-month-ago" land*

ATTENTION EVERYONE:

I am not this 'Atom' character. I have never heard of him/her, and some of you who think I am atom I have never even seen before. I thought it would be fun just to pretend to be Atom for a little while, cause I wanted to have a little fun. But no, I am not CaptainJackSparrow or all those other 8 freaking accounts lol. I'm just a normal ffshriner, cross my heart.

ATTENTION EVERYONE:

I am not this 'Atom' character. I have never heard of him/her, and some of you who think I am atom I have never even seen before. I thought it would be fun just to pretend to be Atom for a little while, cause I wanted to have a little fun. But no, I am not CaptainJackSparrow or all those other 8 freaking accounts lol. I'm just a normal ffshriner, cross my heart.

I can attest to this. And if not, you are a gentleman and a scholar / the troll of the century haha

And you will die you dirty bum, who said you had 8 accounts huh?

I guess now is the time for me to clear the air and say that Im not the homo who posted those 'film mixes' of POTC4, no matter how hilarious that was.

I dont care that you have multiple accounts Im just saying peeps know.

---------- Post added at 10:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:22 PM ----------

Heard about that lol

*cries in nearest bathroom*

I kid. Looks like I am pretty misinformed, though. Thanks for calling me out on it. I wouldn't call myself an "audiophile", I just have a mental OCD disturbance in my brain dramatic enough where I need to see the audio peaks whenever I listen to something ^.^ I do some editing but not much. Actually that's pretty hypocritical because I went my entire life up until July thinking that WAV was lossy... so I suppose I have no room to talk, so I apologize. *goes back to "my-trial-of-Audition 5.5-expired-a-month-ago" land*

Wow I thought I was the only one that had the OCD thing with looking at the peaks of everything you listen to. It's crazy.

I dont care that you have multiple accounts Im just saying peeps know.

---------- Post added at 10:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:22 PM ----------

Heard about that lol
Only people of color (thats not offensive now right? ) say peeps

*bursts out laughing* Im just screwing around. Peeps is a cool word... it always makes me hungry for those little marshmallow things, then I remember feeling like godzilla while eating them, and then finally.. I think of how sick eating 10 of them on a dare made me.

He says I'm reading it wrong. What Spanky said goes along with this, seeing as he said two of those accounts were going at each other.

I dunno. I'm just curious. Not like I have anyone higher up to ask what is going on with the ip search.

This is very interesting. But like 7 said, he can attest to me not being this 'Atom' person with 9 freaking accounts.....

This is what happens when you make a moron a mod~

I was kind of excited at the possibility that Atom had always been around.

Lol sorry to disappoint =(

This is what happens when you make a moron a mod~

I was kind of excited at the possibility that Atom had always been around.

IP searching is useless tho. Its so easy to obtain new IPs or just run yourself thru a secure VPN like I do 24/7 for the most part.

Would they pump out the same ip address that often?

Would they pump out the same ip address that often?

Well my VPN has a fixed IP, but I have access to ones in various countries with different IP addresses.

Proxies and TOR make things quite easy.

Why would you need to do all that if you dont mind me asking?

Why would you need to do all that if you dont mind me asking?

Do all what?
Use a VPN?

A), access sites like Hulu as if I was in the US.
B) Keep my personal IP a little more private
C) Encrypt all my data so my ISP will have a much tougher time prying at what my massive (300 to 700 GB a month) data usage is. A surprising amount is legitimate tho haha.
E) Because Im a l33t motherfucker (yea, saying l33t makes me not l33t at all)

And I felt paranoid about the month I downloaded about 150 gigs XD

The WAVs could be the size of a conventional CD if they are DTS WAV files, which are standard WAVs with a DTS stream embedded in them.

They would be indistinguishable in file size and specs from the same album as a standard audio CD rip.

I figured these were DTS WAVs here in order for them to be 5.1.

Yes, I'm ignoring whatever the hell was going on for the past little bit.

The WAVs could be the size of a conventional CD if they are DTS WAV files, which are standard WAVs with a DTS stream embedded in them.

They would be indistinguishable in file size and specs from the same album as a standard audio CD rip.

I figured these were DTS WAVs here in order for them to be 5.1.

Thats what I was thinking.
I guess if no one has complained that when they tried to play them they heard just a bunch of digital 'hiss' then they couldnt be DTS but would be have to be uncompressed MultiChannel WAV which should be pretty big.

yeah, the bitrate would be 4233kbps for a 44.1 kHz 6-channel WAV, and 4608kbps for a 48kHz.

DTS WAVs are 1411 kbps so they can be 44.1 and work as a standard CD, but played back on a DVD player or CD player connected with a digital out to a receiver. Modern players detect that they are DTS CDs, while older ones just "think" it's a regular CD and in both cases the receiver knows the difference and plays the DTS stream.

Because this isnt really different than what I have now I havent downloaded it, Laptop aint exactly the best rig for comparing tracks. I will dl it when I get home and try it.

So does this have the movie mix of the music, or just the same music released on CD but in 5.1 (or not?) audio mix?

Sarah said as long as none of them are causing trouble, not to worry about it.

lol, I talked to Sarah.

I would have to assume by tracklist that it is the same as the original release in 5.1.

So does this have the movie mix of the music, or just the same music released on CD but in 5.1 (or not?) audio mix?

Unfortunately it's not the film mix. It's the commercial CD just in 5.1. Or whatever it is, idk.....

It is unfortunate that no complete Holmes score exists, I think Zimmer and Balfe did a terrific job with the score.

It is unfortunate that no complete Holmes score exists, I think Zimmer and Balfe did a terrific job with the score.
I have heard its in select hands, mentioned in passing. No proof of it being real tho.

It is legend.

It is unfortunate that no complete Holmes score exists, I think Zimmer and Balfe did a terrific job with the score.

My thoughts exactly. All there is is that list on HZ but there's speculation it's fake

I have heard its in select hands, mentioned in passing. No proof of it being real tho.

Just like Blade Runner until recently (hopefull no 25 year wait)

This is only being recognized as a stereo wave file on my computer. When passing through ffdshow, that actually recognizes it as a stereo source. How can I enjoy this in 5.1?

Well, people thought that King Kong was legend. But I know for a fact it's real, I have seen it

This is only being recognized as a stereo wave file on my computer. When passing through ffdshow, that actually recognizes it as a stereo source. How can I enjoy this in 5.1?

Im not a tech guy so I cant help you sorry.

Well, people thought that King Kong was legend. But I know for a fact it's real, I have seen it
lol.. the beast or the score?
Its always been around. It just depends on who has it, and who they give it to next, in how fast something makes it a little more public.
Now, a real legend is something like T2, which by many accounts is completely lost. Altho, I find that statement quite suspicious

Well, people thought that King Kong was legend. But I know for a fact it's real, I have seen it

Well, no one really cares till they see it, I dont doubt its existence though. Personnally I wish I knew how to do DVD rips and remove FX like a pro. First thing I would do would be to get the whole Sherlock Holmes Score, then Hook, then The Lost World of Jurassic Park.

---------- Post added at 11:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:14 PM ----------


lol.. the beast or the score?
Its always been around. It just depends on who has it, and who they give it to next, in how fast something makes it a little more public.
Now, a real legend is something like T2, which by many accounts is completely lost. Altho, I find that statement quite suspicious

I have seen various releases and really cant recall T2s score note for note like a can ceartin scores.

lol.. the beast or the score?

Well to see the beast all I have to do is look down. The score is what I meant lol

Well, no one really cares till they see it, I dont doubt its existence though. Personnally I wish I knew how to do DVD rips and remove FX like a pro. First thing I would do would be to get the whole Sherlock Holmes Score, then Hook, then The Lost World of Jurassic Park.

---------- Post added at 11:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:14 PM ----------




I have seen various releases and really cant recall T2s score note for note like a can ceartin scores.

They are all crappy DVDRips. Believe me, I have tried to acquire master tapes a few times. Other labels have done so, most recently Silva Screen and they said the masters could not be located.

Well to see the beast all I have to do is look down.

:smug:

Know your emoticons.

It's better to stick to a CD-rip of this soundtrack than the fake-5.1
FLAC/APE would suffice.
Even with all the essentials to play these back with Dolby Pro Logic, you still don't hear anything substantially different.
And if you've got good setups, some software can do the DPL simulation live.
Soundcards most definitely offer some psuedo-surround features.
Media players do too.
Your experience won't be much different than the stereo wav files.

Plus you save space if you go with the other lossless formats (FLAC/APE) or even more so with the mp3's.

i wanted to upload these when i first bought my copy of SH, but after finding it was all just stereo... :-\

My laptop has an optical out built in to the audio out jack, i'll have to try hooking it up to my amp when i get a chance and see what it detects it as.

Personnally I wish I knew how to do DVD rips and remove FX like a pro. First thing I would do would be to get the whole Sherlock Holmes Score, then Hook, then The Lost World of Jurassic Park.[COLOR="Silver"]


There is a DVD rip guide over yonder by one member who just described everything he knows and all the techniques he uses: Thread 84885. It could probably use some modifications by now.

Oh, and about Sherlock Holmes as a DVD rip: cannot be done. MasterZPrime was the first and all he did was extract the 5.1 channels, exclude the center channel and pack it all into mp3 tracks. Thread 79966 I took a look at it myself: voice echoes, voice echoes everywhere. They can't be removed.

There is a DVD rip guide over yonder by one member who just described everything he knows and all the techniques he uses: Thread 84885. It could probably use some modifications by now.

Oh, and about Sherlock Holmes as a DVD rip: cannot be done. MasterZPrime was the first and all he did was extract the 5.1 channels, exclude the center channel and pack it all into mp3 tracks. Thread 79966 I took a look at it myself: voice echoes, voice echoes everywhere. They can't be removed.

If a movie is well mixed, chances are its going to be REALLY hard to extract that music. A good surround mix (arguably) will have effects on all channels.

I really find it a shame that with Blu Ray's much better audio options, that more isolated scores arent availible. Like with the Alien Anthology BR, which has isolated Film Mixes and then the isolated composer versions.

I really find it a shame that with Blu Ray's much better audio options, that more isolated scores arent availible. Like with the Alien Anthology BR, which has isolated Film Mixes and then the isolated composer versions.

audio options have no bearing on the rights to use the music that way.

Many isolated scores have not been carried over from DVD to Blu-ray, including "Glory", "Legends of the Fall" and "Jumanji" to name a few.

I don't know about the other Alien films but in the case of "Aliens", the isolated score for both versions were faked. The theatrical release was not the film mix at all, but an inaccurate approximation using the varese 'Deluxe Edition' as a source in addition to the Rabinowitz percussion cue and Goldsmith cues from the first film added in. I've gone into that before in other threads though.

I really find it a shame that with Blu Ray's much better audio options, that more isolated scores arent availible. Like with the Alien Anthology BR, which has isolated Film Mixes and then the isolated composer versions.

Like the the Inception Blu-ray with 10 5.1 tracks? I wish someone would rip that. It's a special feature being it's those tracks only, no SFX or dialogue

Like the the Inception Blu-ray with 10 5.1 tracks? I wish someone would rip that. It's a special feature being it's those tracks only, no SFX or dialogue

That was ripped a while back, actually. DTS WAV format. Might have to search here or the para...site ;)

That was ripped a while back, actually. DTS WAV format. Might have to search here or the para...site ;)

Hmm...indeed I shall look. Thanks =D

Oh, yeah. I remember that. Not the part about the score being on here but the part about the 2 tracks NOT included on the 5.1 mix were the two best from the OST (IMO): "Dream is Collapsing" and "Waiting for a Train".

Oh, yeah. I remember that. Not the part about the score being on here but the part about the 2 tracks NOT included on the 5.1 mix were the two best from the OST (IMO): "Dream is Collapsing" and "Waiting for a Train".

Yes! That pissed me off so bad. If they included 10 tracks, would it kill them to add the last two? Seriously, wtf. My favorite track is one of the two bonus tracks, Don't Think About Elephants. Pure adrenalin pumping Hans Zimmer

Like the the Inception Blu-ray with 10 5.1 tracks? I wish someone would rip that. It's a special feature being it's those tracks only, no SFX or dialogue

I've actually been making plans to upload this.
In FLAC.
I've got the bluray and ripped it myself.
I also used eac3to to do the handy work.

It should be up near the end of the month.

Also in the future, Big Trouble In Little China (Isolated score) from the bluray (DTS-HD Master Audio, 5.1, 48KHz).
But BTILC is going to take several months.

Inception and BTILC are just a few movies that have isolated scores/music tracks in DTS-HD Master Audio (lossless).
Most other blruay movies have AC3 (lossy).
Beetlejuice has AC3@640
The Matrix has AC3@192 (the same as the first run of dvd's)

Other movies not carrying over the isolated score (let alone upgrading isolated score to lossless audio) include: Rush Hour, The Cell, The Corruptor and I believe Tomorrow Never Dies, Donnie Brasco, and one more I have on DVD somewhere... :sad:

I've actually been making plans to upload this.
In FLAC.
I've got the bluray and ripped it myself.
I also used eac3to to do the handy work.

It should be up near the end of the month.

Also in the future, Big Trouble In Little China (Isolated score) from the bluray (DTS-HD Master Audio, 5.1, 48KHz).
But BTILC is going to take several months.

Inception and BTILC are just a few movies that have isolated scores/music tracks in DTS-HD Master Audio (lossless).
Most other blruay movies have AC3 (lossy).
Beetlejuice has AC3@640
The Matrix has AC3@192 (the same as the first run of dvd's)

Other movies not carrying over the isolated score (let alone upgrading isolated score to lossless audio) include: Rush Hour, The Cell, The Corruptor and I believe Tomorrow Never Dies, Donnie Brasco, and one more I have on DVD somewhere... :sad:

Hey if your working on a Inception BD Rip then take your time man.

Oh, yeah. I remember that. Not the part about the score being on here but the part about the 2 tracks NOT included on the 5.1 mix were the two best from the OST (IMO): "Dream is Collapsing" and "Waiting for a Train".

Dream is Collapsing is on the bluray soundtrack.

Half Remembered Dream is not though.

I've also heard someone suggest that it could be from copyright concerns.
Waiting for A Train has an excerpt of Edith Piaf.
And Half Remembered Dream is essentially a variation of Edith Piaf.
They've obtained rights to release a CD, but probably not for the bluray.

I imagine it was cheaper for the soundtrack, as there aren't that many soundtrack buffs out there (to rival todays generation of glee, high school musical and all that crap).
They probably saw bluray sales to be quite high in volume so opted out on paying for Edith Piaf. :-\

---------- Post added at 12:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 PM ----------


Hey if your working on a Inception BD Rip then take your time man.

I got the 10 tracks ripped and converted already.
I'm just going through to do a clean edit of the opening titles to get a shortened cue for Half Remembered Dream.
And look for a lossless version of "La Mome" aka "La Vien Rose".
The movie ends with Edith Piaf singing Non, Je Ne Regrette Rian. And it's actually Edith Piaf singing and not Marion Collitard. They used an album version of the song, no audience cheering or anything. It's not the greatest 5.1 mix they've done to the song, but it's still quite enjoyable, imo.

Also the End Credits too.

I'll have to buy La Mome, since I can seem to rent it in bluray anywhere.
And bluray rips use the DTS core (lossy).

Dream is Collapsing is on the bluray soundtrack.

Half Remembered Dream is not though.

I've also heard someone suggest that it could be from copyright concerns.
Waiting for A Train has an excerpt of Edith Piaf.
And Half Remembered Dream is essentially a variation of Edith Piaf.
They've obtained rights to release a CD, but probably not for the bluray.

I imagine it was cheaper for the soundtrack, as there aren't that many soundtrack buffs out there (to rival todays generation of glee, high school musical and all that crap).
They probably saw bluray sales to be quite high in volume so opted out on paying for Edith Piaf. :-\

---------- Post added at 12:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:54 PM ----------



I got the 10 tracks ripped and converted already.
I'm just going through to do a clean edit of the opening titles to get a shortened cue for Half Remembered Dream.
And look for a lossless version of "La Mome" aka "La Vien Rose".
The movie ends with Edith Piaf singing Non, Je Ne Regrette Rian. And it's actually Edith Piaf singing and not Marion Collitard. They used an album version of the song, no audience cheering or anything. It's not the greatest 5.1 mix they've done to the song, but it's still quite enjoyable, imo.

Also the End Credits too.

I'll have to buy La Mome, since I can seem to rent it in bluray anywhere.
And bluray rips use the DTS core (lossy).

Download a full 50GB copy maybe?

I wish that fucking glee show never existed. High School Musical is definitely to blame

I'll have to buy La Mome, since I can seem to rent it in bluray anywhere.
And bluray rips use the DTS core (lossy).

What is it exactly that you're looking to get off of the disc? Perhaps if it's not too large, someone can rip the audio or whatever it is you're after, as opposed to the whole 50gb?

Yeah, I was thinking of finding a full bluray.
The movie is good mind you.
It may not total 50gb. it could be 35gb.
Really just need the last two chapters.
Rather enjoyed the End Credit music as well.

Finding someone to rip it (properly) is somewhat a task in itself.
If I buy the bluray movie, i get the end scene i need and get to enjoy the movie again :)

also finding a full bluray rip too...i should venture those old paths again... :erm:

Yeah, I was thinking of finding a full bluray.
The movie is good mind you.
It may not total 50gb. it could be 35gb.
Really just need the last two chapters.
Rather enjoyed the End Credit music as well.

Finding someone to rip it (properly) is somewhat a task in itself.
If I buy the bluray movie, i get the end scene i need and get to enjoy the movie again :)

also finding a full bluray rip too...i should venture those old paths again... :erm:

Go ahead and pick up the Blu-ray. It's good =)

WAV is basically a very very simplistic lossless audio format. Personally, I hate it, because nothing can be tagged (album, artist, album art, ect) when dealing with them.

I can rip a CD to WAV and it contains metadata. WAVs can hold a lot of info (artist, title, even markers).

im sure i had a program that you could just rip it from the disc and choose just to extract an audio track, i don't have sherlock holmes on blu ray myself, but i think when i tried ripping a DTS track it came to something like 2GB in total for just the audio on a 2 hour movie.

Thank You.

Does anybody want to reupload please?

Anyone?

Go ahead and pick up the Blu-ray. It's good =)

I've been having troubles finding a decent Blu-Ray on eBay.
I just might have to shop Amazon. But I think the Canadian Amazon is not so diverse as the American one.
I don't know if I can shop the American one though.