Okay. Well Since I've decided to re-rip Chain Dive (re-rip is halfway complete by the way, just want to give it a unique tracklist). I've also decided to make its own cover art for it, since it was just a plain game cover. I've already made the cover, and ended up making two versions with minor variations on them. Well what I'm asking is... Which of the two do you think is better? (If replying please don't quote. These photos are huge as is.)

Well here they are (Photos are sized huge to specifically look at the two logo differences):
Cover Art 1 -



Cover Art 2 -




Thanks in advance for both taking the time to check this thread out and your opinions.

Okay,maybe I'm going blind,or maybe it's the fact that I'm still in the process of pulling an all-nighter to finish my essay,but I son't see any differences between the two. At all.

In any case,I love it. Looks awesome. How's the game itself?

Okay,maybe I'm going blind,or maybe it's the fact that I'm still in the process of pulling an all-nighter to finish my essay,but I son't see any differences between the two. At all.

In any case,I love it. Looks awesome. How's the game itself?

lol the logos are the difference, and thanks. The gameplay is very unique. It's basically something you've never played before, but not hard to catch on. The stages are a bit repetative, but there's always action. The music is great as well. I recommend it to old school gamers of the older generation, cause next gen gamers only care about graphics.

Is it anything like Shinobi,by any chance? Because it looks like it could be. =)

Is it anything like Shinobi,by any chance? Because it looks like it could be. =)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3eZSq_YRZI Gameplay footage.

This shit looks FUCKING AWESOME!

It's like NiGHTS into Dreams mated with Bionic Commando and/or Rez or something.

hello bro,
i prefer the first man, the reason is simple, you keep the aspect of the Sony Logo size in the first pic instead of a resize in the second one.

then people say "the 2nd logo is resized in the 2nd pic also??"
of course yes, but ILL ViLLaiN had rezised it in keeping its original aspect (no deformation horizontal naeither vertical)

it's my opinion on it.

hello bro,
i prefer the first man, the reason is simple, you keep the aspect of the Sony Logo size in the first pic instead of a resize in the second one.

then people say "the 2nd logo is resized in the 2nd pic also??"
of course yes, but ILL ViLLaiN had rezised it in keeping its original aspect (no deformation horizontal naeither vertical)

it's my opinion on it.

Ahh! So you've noticed the difference. The first is really resized as well. Like about 20 pixels less on both height and width. Thanks on your feedback. If others who view this thread weren't so shy, and gave there opinions on it, it would be more easier for me to make a decision. If nobody reply's I guess I'll use cover 1.

Very slick

As someone who is picky on covers, you did great. I'm leaning closer to #1 rather than #2. Though the black background looks a bit dirty (like from a scanner), or is it part of an image I don't see? (like a small smudge above the logos)

As someone who is picky on covers, you did great. I'm leaning closer to #1 rather than #2. Though the black background looks a bit dirty (like from a scanner), or is it part of an image I don't see? (like a small smudge above the logos)

If you see a smudge then I missed a spot, if not then its just the jpeg I was working on, but still I feel that I didn't completely finish the task. I double check constantly, and if I don't see anything I usually get opinions from someone else. I'm picky too. I made a signature and put it in the signature thread, but made two versions of it. I understand how you feel, but I will clean it up after a decision is made. Thanks for you feedback.