doomjockey
07-29-2008, 11:09 PM
A few opinions since I haven't seen a similar thread.
X-Files: I Want to Believe
I have to say, the actual d�but of the second X-Files movie caught me off guard. Who's paying attention to X-Files this soon after The Dark Knight? After all the delays (it's been in the works since about 2001) I thought there existed no chance that this idea could come to fruition. When it finally premi�red, I had mixed feelings after slipping into a sparsely populated theatre during its first showing.
Fortunately, it's a solid movie for newcomers or anyone who's never heard of the X-Files. Requires not an ounce of back story. Former FBI investigators of the paranormal, Mulder and Scully, answer the call of the FBI to help find a missing person in a strange new case which entails following around a psychic paedophile priest for vague clues. Both Duchovny and Anderson make able returns to their former personae as a conflicted pair who never quite see eye to eye on the paranormal world.
Unfortunately, it's a solid movie for newcomers or anyone who's never heard of the X-Files. Requires not an ounce of back story. Which means long-time fans such as Doomjockey might just hate it because it does absolutely nothing to further the mythos of Chris Carter's epic alien saga established over a period of nine years. Instead, the whole deal feels like a monster-of-the-week episode, and not a particularly good one. Some familiar faces pop up and Mulder's humour remains spot on, but otherwise it might feel somewhat boring and typical of a "filler" episode. Not at all in the vein of the first film, which sported big-budget effects and sweeping revelations (but crappier writing). About the only thing of interest is perhaps the evolved relationship between the two main characters if you're into that sort of study, which I am not.
Of course, I didn't hate it, nor did I enjoy it that much. Overall, I found the writing much improved over the first film if somewhat disconnected from the erstwhile series. To it's credit, the story mixes an intelligent amount of relevant themes to keep it interesting like the scandal in the Catholic church and ambivalence over stem cell research, however there isn't too much action or mystery here. It missed the mark for me.
If you want to believe in something this month, I suggest Harvey Dent.
EDIT: Hell, I believe I posted this in the wrong area. Perhaps this can be moved to Reviews/Recommendations at some point? Many thanks.
X-Files: I Want to Believe
I have to say, the actual d�but of the second X-Files movie caught me off guard. Who's paying attention to X-Files this soon after The Dark Knight? After all the delays (it's been in the works since about 2001) I thought there existed no chance that this idea could come to fruition. When it finally premi�red, I had mixed feelings after slipping into a sparsely populated theatre during its first showing.
Fortunately, it's a solid movie for newcomers or anyone who's never heard of the X-Files. Requires not an ounce of back story. Former FBI investigators of the paranormal, Mulder and Scully, answer the call of the FBI to help find a missing person in a strange new case which entails following around a psychic paedophile priest for vague clues. Both Duchovny and Anderson make able returns to their former personae as a conflicted pair who never quite see eye to eye on the paranormal world.
Unfortunately, it's a solid movie for newcomers or anyone who's never heard of the X-Files. Requires not an ounce of back story. Which means long-time fans such as Doomjockey might just hate it because it does absolutely nothing to further the mythos of Chris Carter's epic alien saga established over a period of nine years. Instead, the whole deal feels like a monster-of-the-week episode, and not a particularly good one. Some familiar faces pop up and Mulder's humour remains spot on, but otherwise it might feel somewhat boring and typical of a "filler" episode. Not at all in the vein of the first film, which sported big-budget effects and sweeping revelations (but crappier writing). About the only thing of interest is perhaps the evolved relationship between the two main characters if you're into that sort of study, which I am not.
Of course, I didn't hate it, nor did I enjoy it that much. Overall, I found the writing much improved over the first film if somewhat disconnected from the erstwhile series. To it's credit, the story mixes an intelligent amount of relevant themes to keep it interesting like the scandal in the Catholic church and ambivalence over stem cell research, however there isn't too much action or mystery here. It missed the mark for me.
If you want to believe in something this month, I suggest Harvey Dent.
EDIT: Hell, I believe I posted this in the wrong area. Perhaps this can be moved to Reviews/Recommendations at some point? Many thanks.