Prak
11-14-2006, 08:10 PM
Bear with me a minute. I'll get to the point soon.
So I was watching the first few episodes of the Death Note anime recently. It seemed pretty neat based on that. It was cleverly written and I liked the characters a lot. Then I looked it up and noticed that the series is planned for over 30 episodes. I had to wonder to myself how that could work. At the pace the show had been going, I saw no way it could last for more than 13 episodes and be decent.
So I checked out the manga. And just as I had feared, it took a turn for the worse. The writing got lazy and the plotting got muddled for the sake of drawing it out longer. By the end, I was wishing it was over already because it was just chapter after chapter of people saying the same things they've said dozens of times before, coming to the same conclusions they've come to before, and tossing in a surprise revelation that was never even hinted at before then. Blech.
It would have been excellent material if the writer had simply stuck to the first arc and tightened it up so that it would play out quickly and end with a bang.
Anyway, here's my point. This kind of thing seems to happen a lot in anime and manga, far more than other mediums. Writers overstep their bounds to draw out a story as long as possible, sacrificing artistic integrity and quality for the sake of a sure sale instead of taking a risk with new material.
What are your takes on this practice? What are some good examples of the right way and the wrong way to do it? Also, feel free to debate it if you think someone's wrong about anything.
So I was watching the first few episodes of the Death Note anime recently. It seemed pretty neat based on that. It was cleverly written and I liked the characters a lot. Then I looked it up and noticed that the series is planned for over 30 episodes. I had to wonder to myself how that could work. At the pace the show had been going, I saw no way it could last for more than 13 episodes and be decent.
So I checked out the manga. And just as I had feared, it took a turn for the worse. The writing got lazy and the plotting got muddled for the sake of drawing it out longer. By the end, I was wishing it was over already because it was just chapter after chapter of people saying the same things they've said dozens of times before, coming to the same conclusions they've come to before, and tossing in a surprise revelation that was never even hinted at before then. Blech.
It would have been excellent material if the writer had simply stuck to the first arc and tightened it up so that it would play out quickly and end with a bang.
Anyway, here's my point. This kind of thing seems to happen a lot in anime and manga, far more than other mediums. Writers overstep their bounds to draw out a story as long as possible, sacrificing artistic integrity and quality for the sake of a sure sale instead of taking a risk with new material.
What are your takes on this practice? What are some good examples of the right way and the wrong way to do it? Also, feel free to debate it if you think someone's wrong about anything.