AAC 320 Kbps

Scanning The Album Includes (Extracted from my personal collection)

Password:ByCharlieBrown




Leave a comment here or
Private Message if you are interested.


Deja un comentario aqu� o
Mensaje Privado si estas interesado.

AAC is VBR always.
Putting 320 is misdirection.

Even if you set it to average around 320, it will always be variable and decide what it wants.

Don't teach shriners bad habits.

AAC is VBR always.
Putting 320 is misdirection.

Even if you set it to average around 320, it will always be variable and decide what it wants.

Don't teach shriners bad habits.

Sweetie, if you wanna get specific:

FLAC, ALAC, AAC (iTunes Plus), mp3 and most audio codecs are compressed and carry parameters that can be switched from variable to constant. No consumer sound file will match the recording/mix sessions. You want perfect uncompressed master sound? Work your way into a recording session on anything where we record anywhere between 88.1 KHz-192 KHz sample rate, 24-bit depth to accurately record, mix, and master the sessions down to redbook standard (44.1KHz, 16-bit WAV at 1411 Kbps) for copying and distribution.

The 320 Kbps standard for iTunes Plus exists, is better at compressing than the mp3 audio codec using an algorithm that is smarter and far more superior to mp3, and reproduces a better copy of the redbook standard files found on CDs today without rolling off frequencies and crushing more bits than necessary to give a damn near CD quality reproduction of a sound file.

Even purchasing a "Mastered for iTunes" file is better than what most mainstream digital music stores offer because the master files they require to label it with that brand require masters of the highest sample rate and bit depth to take advantage of the codecs' compression algorithm.

Give the user credit for giving info, don't degrade the choice of codec. FLAC is quite annoying to deal with and iTunes format is much better streamlined to build a digital library than FLAC ever will be.