Recording
07-24-2016, 12:56 PM
https://photos-6.dropbox.com/t/2/AAB-w6Jm4J5dIhdGi4tAp-cMxopPNsvE7BaILMOimwXz_w/12/579447489/jpeg/32x32/1/_/1/2/MARVEL.jpg/ENShudQEGMYPIAIoAg/lhAnZ4OyeAVkgIlR0L1s02YHJ9DKG_dhiPJ3Ea0uYkU?size_m ode=3&size=1600x1200&dl=0


Marvel Studios Fanfare (https://mega.nz/#F!tocW2KLa!x5kdorvVZF5CyU0_CnJQfw)

Penguincap
07-24-2016, 01:23 PM
Thanks for sharing this.

the marvin
07-24-2016, 01:38 PM
Thanks!
Pretty good but I still like Tyler's fanfare better.

A.S.H
07-24-2016, 01:41 PM
cool, thanks.
i also prefeer Tyler's fanfare, but i prefeer giacchino as composer, wonder if it will be for Doctor strange only or the official fanfare.

nicokino
07-24-2016, 02:25 PM
Thank you. :)
Rep. Added

RenanMontana
07-24-2016, 03:41 PM
Thanks!

vje11
07-24-2016, 05:35 PM
Thanks

Cameron007
07-24-2016, 06:59 PM
Thanks a lot!

Not that I doubt you, but this is really 320? Not sourced from the video?

Clemery76
07-25-2016, 05:38 AM
I guess I prefer Tyler's version, although neither fanfare is overly intersesting or as memorable as some of Goldsmith's, Horner's, Williams' etc logo work.
The logo itself is also extremely long and a bit self indulged with all the Avengers imagery. I don't know too many logos that act as a highlight reel of previous movies.

bebaa
07-25-2016, 06:34 AM
thanks!!

ruby0007
07-25-2016, 07:36 AM
Thanks!

CLONEMASTER 6.53
07-25-2016, 07:53 AM
Thank you! I'm only just wondering if it's a genuine 320kbps bit rate. :p

TheChromeTrainEffect
07-25-2016, 08:01 AM


Well, it's not cut off, but I'm still not sure.

CLONEMASTER 6.53
07-25-2016, 08:06 AM
Well, from the looks of it, I'm pretty sure its all right.

If it wasn't a legitimate 320 bit rate, then it would cutoff at slightly higher than 15 kHz, the latter (15 kHz), or a little lower.

javiman25
07-25-2016, 09:23 AM
Thanks!

EricTan
07-25-2016, 10:50 AM
Thanks a lot. Need to see this in the cinema with the accompanying animation. But, yep, Tyler's is way better. Don't know why a change was needed.

---------- Post added at 05:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:47 PM ----------

Where can I see the animation? Is it already being used? I thought Doctor Strange would be the first movie to use it.

---------- Post added at 05:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:48 PM ----------

Never mind. Here is the animation. A bit too much, I think. Not subtle and very easily dated. Oh why, Marvel, why fix something that ain't broken?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfbY5BrGFpE

GrayEdwards
07-25-2016, 10:51 AM
Thanks for the share. As much as I like Giacchino, I still prefer Tyler's; and as others have said, neither are very good compared to others done by the greats. Oh, well. At least Marvel tries.

uncut1
07-25-2016, 10:54 AM
thank you

PonyoBellanote
07-25-2016, 11:58 AM


Well, it's not cut off, but I'm still not sure.

Why are you people making a deal out of it? It's pretty obvious this was rip from the Youtube video..

TheSkeletonMan939
07-25-2016, 01:04 PM
Never mind. Here is the animation. A bit too much, I think. Not subtle and very easily dated. Oh why, Marvel, why fix something that ain't broken?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfbY5BrGFpE

Agreed. The entire animation, music and all, is inferior to what came before it.

---------- Post added at 08:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:02 AM ----------


Thank you! I'm only just wondering if it's a genuine 320kbps bit rate. :p

It isn't. It's just from YouTube - it's 192kbps. Recording has no clue what he's doing so he either upconverted it himself, or a program told him it could "get" the audio in 320.

James (The Disney Guy)
07-25-2016, 03:38 PM
Why are you people making a deal out of it? It's pretty obvious this was rip from the Youtube video..

It Is Just Any Excuse To Make A Deal. Just Ignore It.

ArcadiaSSX999
07-25-2016, 04:22 PM
Thank you

CLONEMASTER 6.53
07-25-2016, 04:40 PM
Why are you people making a deal out of it? It's pretty obvious this was rip from the Youtube video..

"You people"? It was just two of us, lol.

Also, we were just speculating. It was never a deal in the first place, only speculation. I'm thankful for the upload nonetheless.

PonyoBellanote
07-25-2016, 04:43 PM
Ponyo, we were just speculating.

There is nothing to speculate about

James (The Disney Guy)
07-25-2016, 04:46 PM
"You people"? It was just two of us, lol.

Also, we were just speculating. It was never a deal in the first place, only speculation. I'm thankful for the upload nonetheless.

Well Said.

CLONEMASTER 6.53
07-25-2016, 04:47 PM
There is nothing to speculate about

Well, yes and no. It was just my wondering if it was a genuine 320kbps or not. :p

artkub
07-25-2016, 05:25 PM
Sounds good, but Tyler's fanfares worked far better as the music for studio logo. It was just much more catchy.
Still super-hyped for Doctor Strange, both movie and soundtrack.

Amiral
07-25-2016, 10:47 PM
Thanks for this interesting share.

rocklegend
07-25-2016, 11:29 PM
This Logo music is pretty shit, Tyler's was far better

scoobydoo72
07-27-2016, 01:32 AM
Thanks!

vigilgt
07-27-2016, 02:19 AM
this is way too busy... so many notes...
and the clip is horrible with the real movie footages... the whole thing feels like backwards, not in a good way..
btw, the concept is quite similar with the opening of jonny quest (90's version)
and the music has a cartoon feel, too bright. even jonny quest has a much better theme

NCFirebolt21
07-27-2016, 05:15 AM
A lot of people are bashing the new logo and music so far, but I love Giacchino's theme. It's heroic enough unlike how Tyler's fanfare was basically Thor's theme reused for the other movies except Ant-Man.

Speaking of which, there was an extended version of Brian Tyler's Marvel fanfare which was played before the GOTG premiere. Does anyone have it in decent quality (unlike the video)?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ftt4UlMAcs

darth2602
07-27-2016, 07:20 AM
Tyler is better ...

Dave999
07-27-2016, 09:09 AM
]Never mind. Here is the animation. A bit too much, I think. Not subtle and very easily dated. Oh why, Marvel, why fix something that ain't broken?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfbY5BrGFpE

Holy fuck, how long does a title card have to last... Seriously. The last one was so good, this one is just overkill and plain ugly. The comic book panes were so much better.

Here is some artwork for those who want it. First one was composited from scratch using a YT screenshot. Harder than I thought it was lol :p

(http://imgur.com/Nc82wAp) (http://imgur.com/uAgPgC4)

---------- Post added at 10:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 AM ----------


A lot of people are bashing the new logo and music so far, but I love Giacchino's theme. It's heroic enough unlike how Tyler's fanfare was basically Thor's theme reused for the other movies except Ant-Man.

Speaking of which, there was an extended version of Brian Tyler's Marvel fanfare which was played before the GOTG premiere. Does anyone have it in decent quality (unlike the video)?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ftt4UlMAcs

What about this one? Starts right away: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bZa_V-qNEo

PonyoBellanote
07-27-2016, 11:10 AM
Holy fuck, how long does a title card have to last... Seriously. The last one was so good, this one is just overkill and plain ugly. The comic book panes were so much better.

This is literally just 6 seconds longer than the last one. JUST SIX. People just can't stop whining.

TheSkeletonMan939
07-27-2016, 01:19 PM
this is way too busy... so many notes...
and the clip is horrible with the real movie footages... the whole thing feels like backwards, not in a good way..
btw, the concept is quite similar with the opening of jonny quest (90's version)
and the music has a cartoon feel, too bright. even jonny quest has a much better theme

You mean The Real Adventures of Johnny Quest? Wow, you're right! They executed the concept so much better. I actually wouldn't mind seeing a Marvel logo like this if the music and style were as cool as it was for the opening to that show. What Marvel has done is messy and without personality (just like a lot of Marvel movies!).


This is literally just 6 seconds longer than the last one. JUST SIX. People just can't stop whining.

Six extra seconds is a long time for a LOGO. I went to see The BFG and I was so bummed out by, after seeing twenty minutes of trailers for films I didn't care about, another minute or so of full logos before the film began. Come on! It's just rude in my opinion, especially since tickets even for basic 2-D showings are incredibly overpriced.

NCFirebolt21
07-28-2016, 01:42 AM
Holy fuck, how long does a title card have to last... Seriously. The last one was so good, this one is just overkill and plain ugly. The comic book panes were so much better.

Here is some artwork for those who want it. First one was composited from scratch using a YT screenshot. Harder than I thought it was lol :p

(http://imgur.com/Nc82wAp) (http://imgur.com/uAgPgC4)


Great covers! And I think 36 seconds for one studio logo compensates for three or four studios being involved. I remember Star Trek and Into Darkness both have uber-long logo sequences, which is long enough for Giacchino's theme to set the mood for the movies.

---------- Post added at 10:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 AM ----------



What about this one? Starts right away: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bZa_V-qNEo

Oh no! was actually hoping for just a download link for the intro. Lockdown ripped that intro years ago but it was like in 112kbps. Great performance, but terrible quality.

hack3rman
07-28-2016, 02:20 AM
Great covers! And I think 36 seconds for one studio logo compensates for three or four studios being involved. I remember Star Trek and Into Darkness both have uber-long logo sequences, which is long enough for Giacchino's theme to set the mood for the movies.

If you thought those first two were bad... just wait til you see the opening logos for Star Trek: Beyond!

smyslov
07-28-2016, 02:49 AM
On first impression I agreed with probably all the criticisms of the new intro, but now I've gone past those and think it's fine!

The way I see it now, the Marvel logo isn't only a studio logo like MGM or Universal, it's also a signature for the fictional universe the film occupies. It's equivalent to the James Bond gunbarrel sequence. The studio logos and gunbarrel on the most recent Bond film were almost a minute long. Thirty seconds for Marvel doesn't seem excessive in that context.

The fanfare music IS busier than the last version (which was great but basically it was Thor's theme so not a good intro for every Marvel movie) but that complexity may be to keep it interesting after multiple listenings. Unlike the Bond sequence, which is on one film every three years, the Marvel fanfare will be on three films every one year!

The images of the comic panels were good; when Marvel were starting out, they showed where Marvel movies had come from. But, more than a dozen films into the series, the sequence can now show what Marvel movies actually ARE. And I expect kids will love seeing all their heroes flash past before the start of every movie. Plus the images will possibly vary and be added to as Spider-Man and Doctor Strange and the rest become more prominent.

Will be interesting to see how it plays when there is a new Marvel movie right afterwards, rather than isolated as it is now. That is going to build up a LOT of positive associations. ;-)

NCFirebolt21
07-28-2016, 05:36 AM
If you thought those first two were bad... just wait til you see the opening logos for Star Trek: Beyond!

Looking forward to watching it soon haha, I'm glad Giacchino had Logo and Prosper released as a track...

Dave999
07-28-2016, 08:17 AM
This is literally just 6 seconds longer than the last one. JUST SIX. People just can't stop whining.


Six extra seconds is a long time for a LOGO. I went to see The BFG and I was so bummed out by, after seeing twenty minutes of trailers for films I didn't care about, another minute or so of full logos before the film began. Come on! It's just rude in my opinion, especially since tickets even for basic 2-D showings are incredibly overpriced.

Relax Ponyo. I'm not talking about the music itself rather the visuals. They're horrible. I thought that was pretty obvious from the rest of my comment. And that to me is what makes it seem so long. They're making almost every single character appear in the intro. What happens when Phase 3 is over and everybody is dead? New characters so yet another intro? The comic book panel intro was so much more visually appealing, and you could just slide in new panels (which is what they did) and it would still look exactly the same save for other panels. That was simply yet innovative and I loved every second of it. THAT intro could last as long as they wanted it to. Six additional seconds or sixty, I don't care. This one's just ugly.

blackie74
04-21-2017, 04:59 PM
thank you

guyversnikt
04-22-2017, 07:11 AM
Thanks for this one!

brewster mc
06-05-2017, 02:54 AM
Re-up?

orwellg1984
07-23-2018, 04:37 PM
bump

Arbok9782
07-28-2018, 09:50 PM
Has a version of this not sourced from YouTube ever been posted?

Cameron007
07-28-2018, 10:55 PM
Has a version of this not sourced from YouTube ever been posted?

Unfortunately, I don't think so.

HunterTech
07-29-2018, 01:24 AM
Um, wasn't there Blu-ray rips posted from a while back, when Doctor Strange had leaked?

NCFirebolt21
07-29-2018, 04:02 AM
Um, wasn't there Blu-ray rips posted from a while back, when Doctor Strange had leaked?

The version that premiered at Comic-Con wasn't the final version of the cue; percussion was lacking and there were a few missing instruments.

Salted
07-29-2018, 05:56 AM
Unfortunately, I don't think so.

Here it is in 24/48, clean, no sfx, original recording. Don't listen to it on box (the playback is lossy), just grab the lossless file
https://app.box.com/s/3sdtls2g2nqtim9js6ksi5yrx03d7m8r

NCFirebolt21
07-29-2018, 07:21 AM
Here it is in 24/48, clean, no sfx, original recording. Don't listen to it on box (the playback is lossy), just grab the lossless file
https://app.box.com/s/3sdtls2g2nqtim9js6ksi5yrx03d7m8r

That's the final version used from Doctor Strange onwards, if anyone cares. Thanks for the 24/48 upgrade though! :)

The original Comic-Con version (may have been a demo) that was posted here was most likely a YouTube rip.

docterteeth
08-06-2018, 05:34 AM
Thank you

p.s.bhandari
08-06-2018, 05:41 AM
thanks

korrupted
08-06-2018, 08:54 PM
thanks