<a href="http://imgur.com/IbDbbC3">


At long last, here she blows! This one has been a popular request. Sorry it took so long, ripping vinyl is time consuming. Unlike Jurassic Park (which I will revisit), this sounds flawless. As an added bonus, this is also the Deluxe Edition. It's not very often a Deluxe OST is pressed on vinyl (it's actually only 1 of 2 one I have in my collection, the other being District 9), so take this as an upgrade from the MP3, or even the FLAC one - because nothing beats vinyl ;)


Side A

A1 Panoramic

A2 Outland

A3 The Journey


Side B


B1 Amen

B2 The Convoy

B3 Solara Violated

B4 Safe

B5 Human


Side C


C1 Meant to Be Shared

C2 The Passenger

C3 Den of Vice

C4 Gattling

C5 Blind Faith


Side D


D1 Convoy Destruct

D2 Movement

D3 Carnegie's Demise

D4 The Purpose

D5 The Bridge (Bonus Track)

D6 Dissolve (Bonus Track)

D7 Carnegie's Pulse (Bonus Track)


Side A:
https://mega.co.nz/#!jFY2CSZL!PFvyQogzrdr58eA-jopXcinxRXp-NjK4-BqrQ60Ym2c

Side B:
https://mega.co.nz/#!mF4HnRRa!nfeKkwo30lPwCWN02vyEY-E2xcb7JVhhCIPPmO7DpaY

Side C:
https://mega.co.nz/#!3d5CxbBY!cxWvCBeDcBDP3Zdd3PyzwYidr_fW-l_lV5fSVYU-LPY

Side D:
https://mega.co.nz/#!aUBHnBrD!DwpRfLazFReSS3H5Bdw5eCRJ-VRNQyJIcmsQjQ6Tooc

Thanks DAKoftheOTA !! Lovely

thanks.

Thanks.

thank you very much for this excellent music!

Thank you so much DAK. Appreciate your time doing this for us.

Very nice post. Thank you for your efforts.

Thanks! Love the music to the film. If you don't mind me asking, where did you get the album? Didn't know a vinyl edition of the score existed.

thanks for the rip DAKoftheOTA

Thank you

First - i appreciate the time you have put into this :)

But, there is no audio activity above 20-21 kHz in any track. And i'm just pointing this out, please don't hate me for that ;) 96 kHz for this is overkill if the source material can't produce more. Even a CDs 44.1 kHz would be more than enough

First - i appreciate the time you have put into this :)

But, there is no audio activity above 20-21 kHz in any track. And i'm just pointing this out, please don't hate me for that ;) 96 kHz for this is overkill if the source material can't produce more. Even a CDs 44.1 kHz would be more than enough

Well then do you have a suggestion for the next time I rip? How do I know what the kHz range is on any given vinyl? I just know that people have bitched about my rips not being 96k, so to make everyone happy, that's what I've been doing. I'm all ears if you have tips from improvement, and I appreciate it.

Hopefully there are experienced vinyl rippers around here? I have no experience whatsoever. What i do know is how to check the frequency range. Was it Lockdown or mr merrick that had posted vinyl rips before? Perhaps you could pass that question along to them? They might know the proper settings in doing this

And i hope no offense is taken :)

I would suggest 88.2KHz for anyone who wants to edit.

Since CD spec is 44.1 (half of 88.2, this makes downsampling to MP3 or CD mathematically smoother than uneven 96KHz; unless, you mean to downsample to MP3,DVD,BD specs of 48KHz).

MP3 can handle 48KHz, so it's no big deal.

I don't know how big people (here) are big on making CD's anymore.
But if there are people who want to burn to CD (for reasons of their own), 88.2 would be more logical.



However, I would just abolish all CD specs when it comes to vinyl.

Rip it highest you can (96 is good enough).
Edit how you please.
Then downsample to 48KHz/24bit for final product.

And reiterate that it's impractical for anyone to want higher frequencies.
Even 48 should be well enough for them to edit with, if they want to do any further processing.
Plus, whoever is editing, would have reasonable technology to resample to higher frequencies to do their wishful editing.

There wouldn't be anyone to say "they want the original frequency" since you can rip at either 88.2 or 96 and the difference is extremely neglible.
Any arguments about wanting "as close to original" is completely debateable since we're talking analogue-to-digital.

With all these high frequency rips and digital copies of music, I keep what was given on an external (because I have the space to).
But for MP3, I'll use SaRaCon for sample rate conversion before converting to MP3 for me portable.



x>48KHz is simply for editing and processing.
Why blu-rays use 96KHz for music tracks is beyond me. I'm not sure if anyone from the studios ever talked about it or provided irrefutable evidence or.. what. I'm not sure. But, since it's only double 48, it don't matter too much. Any resampling by any device it's connected to will be smooth, if not accurate.

I think we should get quite a few of experienced rippers to join in a thread with info on ripping vinyl and logistics.



You'll always have people to defend your actions. :)
Provided there's logic behind them.

PS: THANKS FOR THIS! :)

Having ripped some LPs, and being slightly nerdish, here are my few somewhat uncertain cents..

The master the LP is based on is more or less "the CD master", and therefore we wont see the higher frequencies of an analog\ higher-res master? (or perhaps the entire production is done 44/16?)

As the Germans won the World-cup, lets continue the fun with the help of a graph...
Here's a comparison between the CD(purple), and the LP(blueish), and thanks a bunch for the share by the way!



It seems the LP's frequencies are in fact "falling" sooner than the CD's, but you still have the noice-floor(ehh.. right name for it?) at -144db aprox, which should(i think) mean this is recorded in 24 bits...
So perhaps you've got things right, and the LP is to blame..


Then again; I ain't no audio engineer:D

What is that? How did you get two spectrals in one?
What software did you use?

It's from Adobe Audition, there you can take "snapshots" of the frequency response scale and freeze\hold them. Even when working on other files.

A bit more text on it: Adobe Tutorial (http://help.adobe.com/en_US/audition/cs/using/WS58a04a822e3e5010548241038980c2c5-7f5c.html)

You guys here should do a bit of research on this - people can't hear above 20khz anyway...but the sampling rate still matters - Please stay at 96khz 24bit:)

Yes, we know that - but it's what my Audacity settings are at - and you say we can't hear above 20kHz yet ask to stay at 96kHz? Or did you just mean stay at 24-bit? That's also what I have Audacity set at, so that won't be changing, either.

Thank you so much for this!

I keep getting an error message on MEGA with Side A. The other three are fine though.

Thank you very much.

Thank you very much.
From Mexico.

This is one of my favorite movies.
Many thanks for sharing this.

This is one of my favorite movies.
Many thanks for sharing this.

Mine, too. I love it's message

thanks for the share.

You guys here should do a bit of research on this - people can't hear above 20khz anyway...but the sampling rate still matters - Please stay at 96khz 24bit:)

The frequency of sampling (the sampling rate) is different from the maximum tone (khz) of the audio.

However, only sampling rate of 2 times the highest frequency is required to reproduce any sound.

As 20khz is the upper range of human hearing, a 40 khz would be the minimum required sampling rate to accurately reproduce all audible sounds.

Thus, a sampling rate of 96khz could be seen as an unnecessary waste of data and a sampling rate of 44.1khz or 48khz would be more advisable.

why? (https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=nyquist&oq=nyquist&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60j69i57j69i60l2j69i59.1784j0 j1&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8#safe=off&q=nyquist+frequency)

---------- Post added at 02:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:59 PM ----------

Digital booklet of the album: https://mega.co.nz/#!IJpjxCbC!JeSo2jFO9i0WaKiHbuoaDAdwGsfwBYlL9SMVC_x oPnI

Thanks!

Thank You for this one!

Scott

Awesome!!! Thank you so much! I'm so glad the links are still working.

thanks a lot

Please re-up Side D, s'il vous plait!

Could someone re-upload this? It's a great score, too bad that the links are dead.

Any chance of a re-upload please? Much appreciated!

Re-Up, please?