Kuro
03-17-2004, 01:36 PM
Do you prefer a physical onslaught or an imprenetrable defense?

ff MASTER
03-17-2004, 01:58 PM
defo strength all the way defence is nothing. if you just keep atacking you are 100% sure to win.:cool:

Top Cat
03-17-2004, 01:59 PM
I generally go for strength, although all my characters have strong attack and defence.

Bahamut ZERO
03-17-2004, 02:17 PM
"The best form of defence is offense, and the best form of offense is one that doesn't involve me." - Dave Lister, one of the countless Red Dwarf books that are available (though not a story one, just a random factoid one.)

Uhhh, defence. Because, y'know, if you can't get killed by the enemy's attack, at least you're gonna be able to just pound him to submission eventually.

Landlord of Sector 7
03-17-2004, 02:42 PM
strenght. Don't know why I just like it

_D3viL_Hunt3r_
03-17-2004, 07:20 PM
STRENGTH BABY!!!!

Kuro
03-17-2004, 07:49 PM
yup, If you are strong enough to kill'em in a hit or two, there's no need for a god defense

Lightning Mage
03-17-2004, 08:05 PM
I prefer defensive. I have a lot of it. I need it to be preotected when casting spells.

Dr. Lucien Sanchez
03-18-2004, 08:12 AM
"A great offense is the best defence," is what some people say, and I say it too. It works as well.

Fanaticalism
03-18-2004, 08:48 AM
I go for strength first cos you obviously need it to survive.

darkness of eternity
03-18-2004, 09:17 AM
personally i'd like them both good because what good is being able to kill an enemy in two hits with high strength if your defence is so low they can kill you in one...but i always like my strength to be higher than my defence

Alpott
03-18-2004, 09:33 AM
Dont want to die quick now do we?

darkness of eternity
03-18-2004, 09:34 AM
course not, that's why both are important...

Alpott
03-18-2004, 09:39 AM
Fine, but high defense and low attack aint AS good i suppose..

liu bei
03-18-2004, 10:39 AM
attacking is gererally better than defending

KREAYSHAWN
03-18-2004, 10:42 AM
High Defense and low Attack is better than vice versa, because you'll be killed before you can really hurt them. ;)

Ark Mune
03-18-2004, 11:22 AM
I voted for stregnth, but i usually try to make my characters well rounded with all or most aspects.

Slash
03-18-2004, 02:18 PM
normally i wud go for strengh, but i chose defence cus in my opion its beta. cus if ur weak but hav a gd defence i think u got more chance of wining plus the fact that if it wasnt for protect an shel i wudnt of beten ultimecia! so from now on defence all the way! (i only realised this last night!)

LonewolfSquall
03-18-2004, 04:05 PM
I think ya gotta have a little of both defense and offense. But it also depends on the character's job. If its a mage you need defense, but if its a warrior, attack is generally the way to go, but ya still gotta have defense. Its kinda like choosing between a bow and arrow and a sword, both are awesome but if yer fighting long range a bow works better, if yer fighting close range a sword would be better. unless of course you had a gunblade then you would have a long and close range weapon.

Savior_Sephiroth
03-18-2004, 04:33 PM
Strength

labrat
03-18-2004, 10:59 PM
I voted strength. Though both are necessary to be able to survive in battle.

Agent0042
03-18-2004, 11:27 PM
I say... neither! I like speed best because if you have good speed, then a lot of times you don't have worry about either strength or defense.