So apparently the tracklist for the complete Thin Red Line score by Hans Zimmer got posted yesterday on hans-zimmer.com but was quickly deleted as well. Did anyone snag that list? I'm dying to see how much there really is...

Here it is... And I can say clearly that IT IS LEGIT :))

1. 1m00 (11 12) NEW DNU (1:32)
2. 1m00 (11 12) NEW V.2 (1:33)
3. 1m00 Opening (3:03)
4. 1m00 v.3 Nature Montage (1:16)
5. 1m02 Children Swimming (3:17)
6. 1m05 Witt W Melanesians (1:41)
7. 1m06 Witt W Melanesians (1:42)
8. 1m06 v.3 Island (1:46)
9. 1m06 v.3 Island (alternate) (1:46)
10. 1m06 Island (New Version) (1:29)
11. 2m08 Witt in Brig (3:26)
12. 2m08 v.2 Witt in Bring (3:37)
13. 2m09 Tall & Quintardi (5:08)
14. 3m11 Staros Below Deck (2:04)
15. 4m14 March Island DNU (8:24)
16. 4m14 March Island Remix (8:26)
17. 4m14R March Island (8:32)
18. 5m16 Tall Staros Orientation (2:24)
19. 6m19 The Grass (0:49)
20. 6m22 Talls Calls Staros (2:43)
21. 7m23 v.1 Keck's Death (4:36)
22. 7m23 v.2 Keck's Death (4:49)
23. 8m25 Welsh Helps Tella (2:30)
24. 8m26 Bead Dies (8:12)
25. 8m26 Bead Dies (New Version) (3:40)
26. 9m29 v.2 Bell Goes Alone (3:56)
27. 9m30 Tall & Staros (3:30)
28. 9m34 Bird v.2 Welsh & Witt Talk (3:23)
29. 9m34 GOD v.2 (10:39)
30. 10m31 Gaff's Party Returns (3:19)
31. 10m31 Gaff's Party Returns (with New Percussions) (3:06)
32. 11m33 v.1 Prisoners (2:09)
33. 11m33 v.2 Prisoners (2:05)
34. 12m39b v.1 (7:57)
35. 12m39b v.3 (3:30)
36. 13m41 Tall Does Nails (1:37)
37. 13m41 Short Tall Does Nails (1:25)
38. 14m42 Air Field Bell Flashback (6:01)
39. 14m42 New ending Airfield (7:21)
40. 14m42 old (6:00)
41. 14m52 (3:43)
42. 15m44 Village Flashback (2:08)
43. 15m45 Witt Travels (2:42)
44. 15m45 46 v.2 Witt Travels Copra (5:49)
45. 15m45 46 (6:12)
46. 15m46 v.4 (6:45)
47. 16m47 In the River Witt Chased (1:30)
48. 16m49 v.3 Witt Chassed (4:28)
49. 17m51 Proc. (4:11)
50. 17m51 Saar Witts Death (2:14)
51. 17m53 CD (5:17)
52. 17m53 v.1 (4:40)
53. 17m53 v.3 Cemetary (4:46)
54. 17m55 (1:56)
55. Big Chord (1:38)
56. Cosmic Beam (drone) (5:43)
57. Grace v.1 - D minor (5:15)
58. Grace v.2 - A minor (5:18)
59. JP Concerto for Beam (6:03)
60. Mono Orch 60 bpm DNU (3:26)
61. Mono Orch 66.5 bpm (3:05)
62. Mono Orch Brass 60 bpm (3:39)
63. Monotone 7 Bars DNU (2:08)
64. Monotone 7 Bars (2:15)
65. River #5 (ReRecOrch) (5:42)
66. Rolling Thunder (3:28)
67. Wild Bowls with Panning Fx (7:19)
68. Wild Bowls with Png Fx & Shaku (7:20)
69. Wild Bowls with Shaku (7:51)
70. Wild Bowls (7:49)
71. Wild Shakuhashi (9:56)
72. Wild Solemn Taiko (3:42)
73. Wild Solo Cello (1:31)
74. Wild War Drums (18:36)

its accurate and its out there from what I saw

- cut -

The Thin Red Line (Complete Recordings) in 320k for $2.00 through paypal. You're welcome.

http://www.graf-music.com/load/soundtracks/hans_zimmer_the_thin_red_line_complete_score/1-1-0-20

The Thin Red Line (Complete Recordings) in 320k for $2.00 through paypal. You're welcome.

http://www.graf-music.com/load/soundtracks/hans_zimmer_the_thin_red_line_complete_score/1-1-0-20

NOT 320. Transcoded from 128Kbps.

NOT 320. Transcoded from 128Kbps.

The compressed file size of the 320 version is 771.9mb, which is far more than the 128k version (296.78mb) you'll find here...

http://download-soundtracks.com/movie_soundtracks/the-thin-red-line-soundtrack-complete-by-hans-zimmer/

The difference in quality is marginal (relative to say the CD or FLAC Thin Red Line, which is 1508kbps), but you can hear the difference with good earphones.

Yes, the compressed file size, and file size in general, is higher with the higher bitrate you go. However, that means nothing. You could transcode it to 1kbps and then to FLAC and the FLAC version would have a huge filesize despite having probably no audio in it due to the massively lossy compression that comes in part with 1kbps.

What matters is the retention of frequency response.

Because the 320 was created from the 128, the 128 is still superior in quality. You cannot transcode lossy to lossy, you will just lose quality. Yes, the 320 has a higher bitrate, but this means absolutely nothing considering that it came from a file that is already lossy!. The highest bitrate you can have is 128 beacuse that's what the source is. I am just saying, that posting a link to buy something that is inferior to something that is already available for free and in a superior quality, is just ridiculous, and uneeded.

You're just losing quality from transcoding 128 into 320, and gaining absolutely, nothing.
It's like with lossless audio, you can't resample something from 48kHz to 96kHz, and espect it to be better. The source audio was recorded at 48kHz. Making it higher doesn't add in quality that was never there to begin with.

so it isn't an upgrade?

Yes, the compressed file size, and file size in general, is higher with the higher bitrate you go. However, that means nothing. You could transcode it to 1kbps and then to FLAC and the FLAC version would have a huge filesize despite having probably no audio in it due to the massively lossy compression that comes in part with 1kbps.

What matters is the retention of frequency response.

Because the 320 was created from the 128, the 128 is still superior in quality. You cannot transcode lossy to lossy, you will just lose quality. Yes, the 320 has a higher bitrate, but this means absolutely nothing considering that it came from a file that is already lossy!. The highest bitrate you can have is 128 beacuse that's what the source is. I am just saying, that posting a link to buy something that is inferior to something that is already available for free and in a superior quality, is just ridiculous, and uneeded.

You're just losing quality from transcoding 128 into 320, and gaining absolutely, nothing.
It's like with lossless audio, you can't resample something from 48kHz to 96kHz, and espect it to be better. The source audio was recorded at 48kHz. Making it higher doesn't add in quality that was never there to begin with.

That's pure speculation... whereas I can hear the slight quality difference between 128k and 320k. It's not perfect compared to say the CD soundtrack uncompressed, but it's still good.

what would the world be like without scammers?

That's pure speculation... whereas I can hear the slight quality difference between 128k and 320k.

Yeah, you can. Your 320k version sounds worse than the 128k, for the reason Zaralyth stated.

You were scammed outta two bucks, el stupido.

That's pure speculation... whereas I can hear the slight quality difference between 128k and 320k. It's not perfect compared to say the CD soundtrack uncompressed, but it's still good.

It's not speculation, it's science. I'll show the specs if you really want to be disproven more.

---------- Post added at 11:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:21 AM ----------


so it isn't an upgrade?

It's a downgrade.

---------- Post added at 11:27 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:22 AM ----------

If it sounds better to you, it's a placebo effect.