Jorchking
04-23-2012, 02:53 PM
What kind of Format are they?
radliff
04-23-2012, 06:28 PM
mp3, if the mk64 ones are representative
thank you, jorchking
Jorchking
04-23-2012, 06:33 PM
What kind of Format are they?
mp3, if the mk64 ones are representative
thank you, jorchking
YES!! Sorry, added the info of the OST
The Ultimate Koopa
04-23-2012, 07:46 PM
What do you mean by 128-320 kbps?
IMO (and probably a lot of other people's 128 kbps MP3s should be burnt in a pile of cow pat. I only say this because I consider 128 kbps MP3s to be pretty much "really really crap", and I usually think that anyone who uses 128 kbps needs to learn about quality, and if they're worried about space, then they must have a 20 MB hard drive
I have heard great music with 56kbps and I know poor quality songs with 320kbps.
The only thing it means is that more Data per Second, that contains more information to make the music more defined. But In most cases it's true that more kbps makes a better listening-experience.
But you also need a good Soundset to actually hear the difference. I have only 2 smaller speakers and a small subwoofer and when I can in most cases not hear the not hear the difference between a kbps mp3 and a FLAC Version of the same song.
My Point is: For Most people even lower kpbs-numbers are enaugh. Plus you save a ton of memory, thats expecialy important for mobile devices.
Also I don't think it's Jorchkings fault, he just uploaded what he got.
The Ultimate Koopa
04-23-2012, 08:39 PM
Well the only way 320 kbps would be crap, is if you're an idiot and converted a 128 kbps MP3 to 320 kbps.
It's impossible for 320 kbps to be the same as 56 kbps. It's not just "OMG 320 kilobits per second". It also compresses the quality. Why is it if you save something in Audacity at 320 kbps, and the same one at 56 kbps, it sounds completely different?
There can never be any good quality 56 kbps MP3s, especially if the original source is larger. If you're converting from CD Quality, or something like 1411 kbps or whatever, down to 320 kbps, then 320 kbps is pretty good. If you're converting 56 kbps to 320 kbps it'll be crap.
Well the only way 320 kbps would be crap, is if you're an idiot and converted a 128 kbps MP3 to 320 kbps.
It's impossible for 320 kbps to be the same as 56 kbps. It's not just "OMG 320 kilobits per second". It also compresses the quality. Why is it if you save something in Audacity at 320 kbps, and the same one at 56 kbps, it sounds completely different?
There can never be any good quality 56 kbps MP3s, especially if the original source is larger. If you're converting from CD Quality, or something like 1411 kbps or whatever, down to 320 kbps, then 320 kbps is pretty good. If you're converting 56 kbps to 320 kbps it'll be crap.
I never said it would be the same...
I just said that a lot of people wouldn't be able to hear the differnce between 320kbps and 128kbps when they hear Music on a PC and therefore don't really need such high quality. (In other Words people are asking semselfs this question: "Why do I need the song at 3 MB, when I can have the same song at 1,5MB and it sounds the same?")
We on the other hand are people who are really interrested in getting the best Listening Experience. We probably have a better SoundSet with which we are able to hear the Differences, if you listen closly.
(btw. 56 kbps was an extreme example, I'm fully aware that a lot of Stuff at that rate really sounds bad, but I'm generally talking about 128 here)
Jorchking
04-23-2012, 10:08 PM
I never said it would be the same...
I just said that a lot of people wouldn't be able to hear the differnce between 320kbps and 128kbps when they hear Music on a PC and therefore don't really need such high quality. (In other Words people are asking semselfs this question: "Why do I need the song at 3 MB, when I can have the same song at 1,5MB and it sounds the same?")
We on the other hand are people who are really interrested in getting the best Listening Experience. We probably have a better SoundSet with which we are able to hear the Differences, if you listen closly.
(btw. 56 kbps was an extreme example, I'm fully aware that a lot of Stuff at that rate really sounds bad, but I'm generally talking about 128 here)
All OST uploaded have good sound, some ost are 128 some 192, others 320 for that reason I put 128-320kbps.
This songs are not re-ripped.
Densuke
05-03-2012, 01:39 PM
Mario Party is not available :(
Jorchking
05-03-2012, 07:50 PM
Mario Party is not available :(
Someone of FFShrine reported my account and now is closed, I don't know who is, but is my first time that an account of File Sharing is clossed.
Im sure that who reported me is from FFshrine
The Ultimate Koopa
05-04-2012, 12:03 AM
It wasn't me <_< :P
OK, seriously, though, it wasn't me. I hate people who do that.
Jorchking
05-04-2012, 12:07 AM
It wasn't me <_< :P
OK, seriously, though, it wasn't me. I hate people who do that.
No problem man, I thought upload in torrent, so not deleted the thread (To mods XD).
The Ultimate Koopa
05-04-2012, 12:16 AM
Torrents should be OK, as long as there are enough seeders.
Jorchking
05-04-2012, 12:18 AM
Torrents should be OK, as long as there are enough seeders.
yes, in this days i'll try upload, and maybe upload some in lossless